Intelligence Officials Can't Keep Story Straight: Snowden Both Did And Did Not Get Key NSA Secrets
from the which-is-it? dept
We've already talked about how NSA surveillance supporters are trying to claim both that Ed Snowden's links were either "nothing new" or "false" and that they "harm America." We had trouble understanding how both could be true -- but supporters were making both statements. Now intelligence officials are doing their own sort of contradictory statements, as pointed out by Glenn Greenwald. First up, we've got intelligence officials claiming that Snowden didn't get the really deep dark secrets of the NSA:U.S. intelligence now believes Edward Snowden did not gain access to the "crown jewels" of National Security Agency programs that secretly intercept and monitor conversations around the world, CNN has learned.Note that comes from CNN reporter Barbara Starr who is well known for basically spreading the NSA official line so much that she's been called "the Pentagon spokesperson who works for CNN." However, just a day later, another site published a quote from General Bob Kehler, who "oversees cyber warfare" and is "sort of" NSA chief Keith Alexander's boss, claiming something quite different:
He referred to the type of information Snowden released as ”the deepest of the deep secrets.”So... he didn't get access to the "crown jewels" but has already released "the deepest of the deep secrets"? How does that work?
The reality is that these guys are basically just posturing for different audiences. They want to downplay the seriousness of the leaks, while still attacking Snowden and making it out like this action is so dangerous. The problem is that both things can't be true. But, of course, when has the NSA and the intelligence community ever cared about truth? You'd just think they'd be a bit more careful about so obviously contradicting themselves.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ed snowden, nsa, secrets, surveillance
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Jokes apart they'll say whatever fits at the occasion. Obscurity sometimes may be the best card you can play when shit has hit the fan. Maybe shift focus from what happened to "was it deep secrets or not"? Or maybe shift it to Snowden personality or something? Seems to work with alienated people though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's called consequences to your action. Something which the US gov. think doesn't apply to them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Playing off of Ninja's first comment..
Snowden did likely indeed take classified material with him....his knowledge base...and some private personal data of people the NSA has spied on...but some of the documents he carries are quite publicly accessible. Policies like what to do in an emergency should never be classified.
I think that this sudden turn around is a combination of not admitting you're wrong, and at the same time trying to save face.
As long as Snowden preserves (meaning he doesn't crack under torture) the classified information that needs to be classified, he should be ok.
The NSA and congress have no reason to fear him yet they do. I'm reminded of an old Western proverb:
"Sinners flee when there is no sin committed to flee from."
This means that only a person hiding something would run or backpedal when they've been caught. Snowden is fleeing...but not for the same reason the NSA is trying to backpedal on what it has been saying.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
psyops
good overview & complete (as of now) documents at:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB222/index.htm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
YEAH, they need to HYPE yet can't admit huge breach.
I like how you let me prove I've been right from the start of this "leak", so, Mike, keep running these pieces in which YOU are puzzled by obvious inconsistency that a limited hangout psyop explains perfectly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: YEAH, they need to HYPE yet can't admit huge breach.
Go take a nap, or find a real job.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If this is "nothing new" then why are they making a big deal outta this!? This seems like attention getting if they're trying to make one guy look like the biggest threat to the US, or just something to top the previous scandal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wait wait wait
Animal cruelty! Someone call ASPCA! And PETA! (Hey, if PETA tries to throw fake blood at the NSA building and they get arrested for it, it's a win-win for everyone, right?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
All they know is what he has released so far.
I doubt he is carrying the only copies too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lately whenever I see an article with "NSA" in the title, I hear the theme from 'The Three Stoges" play in my head.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not surprised..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As any middle schooler will tell you, such an offence must be dealt with with extreme prejudice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dear Mr. Snowden
To drop the hammer on these guys and get on with the show.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How?
Also, we also have shows like Person of Interest & games like Watch_Dogs* that wouldn't exist if the concept of the US government spying on their own citizens wasn't already a main stream concept, if still considered a myth or conspiracy before the recent leaks.
All Snowden did was admit, yes, the NSA is indeed doing what you all have suspected for decades. Here's the proof.
& I JUST saw a local NBC broadcast mention the House voted to allow the spying to continue, & that it is now up to the Senate to attempt to defund the spy programs (they actually used the word "spy" a few times).
*In an interview at E3 for Watch_Dogs (skip to 13:57 for the NSA mention), one of the Ubisoft guys was asked if the NSA stuff was a marketing ploy, & he talks about how the terminology being used w/ the NSA is the same as the game, & how reality has surpassed the game.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Crown swag
[ link to this | view in chronology ]