Rotolight Uses DMCA To Censor Review They Didn't Like, Admits To DMCA Abuse For Censorship
from the copyright-as-censorship dept
Remember how a copyright maximalist was just claiming that it's simply ridiculous that anyone would ever use copyright to censor? We pointed out a pretty long list of examples of how that's bogus, but here's another one, via BoingBoing. It seems that a guy named Den Lennie did a video review comparing the Rotolight Anova to a competing product, the Kino Flo Celeb. Lennie's review showed that the Kino device was better, and apparently Rotolight took offense. So what do they do? They send a completely fraudulent DMCA complaint to Vimeo, who shamefully took the video down without doing even the slightest check to see if it was actually infringing.Even worse, when Den posted about this, Rotolight flat out admitted to a fraudulent DMCA takedown, noting that they "did not feel the test was fair or representative" and thus they used the DMCA to take it down:
But, no, we're told, copyright law is never used for censorship...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, dmca, reviews, trademark
Companies: rotolight
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Someone get this man a lawyer
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
We're so sorry
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Well, you guys say was no infringed content on Megaupload...
Tell ya what: take the admission and prosecute to fullest extent of the law. I'm all for curtailing abuses by corporations.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Well, you guys say was no infringed content on Megaupload...
There is a reason why when you repress what the public believes to be true through legislation, whether it be the war on drugs, alcohol or prostitution, it turns ugly through black-market monopolies.
If we started funding creativity and not creations, and started backing the crowdfunding revolution and copyright abolition instead, we would have none of these problems.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Unfortunately for entities such as Rotolight, citizen justice is usually a bit rougher than legal sanctions.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Well, you guys say was no infringed content on Megaupload...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Then you need to do more research.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Well, you guys say was no infringed content on Megaupload...
The problem, Mr Blue, is that there is literally no proof of that, MU followed standard DMCA procedures as far as we can tell and therefore was entitled to all the protection of safe harbors whether you want to kick and scream about pirate-havens or not.
Typically we tend to assume innocence until proven guilty. Anecdotes and hearsay have no place in the realm of justice and guilt (maybe someone should tell our government this, they seem to have forgotten).
Maybe if that fine, upstanding government's incompetence had not resulted in the deletion of all those PETABYTES of evidence you claim was 100% against MegaUpload, there could have been a wide-ranging study on the data to determine the actual percentage of infringing content. Unfortunately that never came to be, so I guess your baseless conjecture has very little standing, no?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Seriously
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
If it is, they would have to replace it with something else to retain the same safeguards. I do not trust a single person in congress or the senate to not make the resulting bill many times worse than what the DMCA already is. It would be ProtectIP but on a scale that would destroy the concept of service providers.
I'm convinced the DMCA is a necessary evil, it's not perfect, however the possible alternatives are far worse.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Well, you guys say was no infringed content on Megaupload...
No, we have another company, organization, or person thinking they can get away with using the DMCA as a censorship tool — or did all those examples in the column about people using the DMCA as a censorship tool slip your mind?
(And remember: because government grants people copyright through the law, using the DMCA in this way counts as government-sponsored censorship. Someone really oughta sue someone who uses the DMCA as a censorship tool on those grounds.)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Have another report vote ootb for not being able to stay on topic and not being able to see the truth when it smacks you up beside the head.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"and i'd do it again"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Why would they have to?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Well, you guys say was no infringed content on Megaupload...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Well, you guys say was no infringed content on Megaupload...
Also, this DCMA takedown is hardly an isolated incident. In fact they are pretty standard. Corporations like Roto Light aren't even embarrassed to admit that they are breaking the law.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mr Roto Light is abusing Terms of Service with his FB account
He should be reported to Facebook.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Mr Roto Light is abusing Terms of Service with his FB account
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
The system has become a too integral part of what people expect from a law-abiding company.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Well, you guys say was no infringed content on Megaupload...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: We're so sorry
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Well, you guys say was no infringed content on Megaupload...
This has been proven to be false already especially due to the fact that a huge percentage of the files in their servers were never downloaded suggesting people were using it as backup means. I've used Megaupload several times in the past to share huge geographic data such as maps and referenced databases among several peers. The biggest file I've worked with at the time had over 2Gb so it's clear that it had legit usage as a tool for distributing content. And of course the US never let Megaupload dig the servers to build any defense so there isn't much evidence other than studies and polls.
I'm all for curtailing abuses by corporations.
And yet you are fine with the abuses the MAFIAA and the US Government are engaged into in this case. Carry on little brainless parrot.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Rotolight Founder is a HUGE UK Music Producer!
LOOK at his Linked in Profile! He knew EXACTLY what DMCA is used for! http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=121492491
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Seriously
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Well, you guys say was no infringed content on Megaupload...
Just sayin'.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not so simple
I'm sure people will keep ignoring this nuanced reality, though, to their detriment (because it's much more fun to crow about fighting the powers that be)...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Study: Megaupload closure boosted Hollywood sales 10%
Just for the permanent record, since the usual Techdirt ankle-biters above are denying results of a study that even Mike had to admit was sound.
Visitors: The ankle-biters sole tactic here is to wear you down by repeating the same FALSE claims over and over. Just read theregister item and compare with comments above. These kids are in their own little walled garden.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Well, you guys say was no infringed content on Megaupload...
You have an isolated incident, while nearly every file of PETABYTES on Megaupload was infringing. Your only consistency is that you STILL defend Megaupload and use this to attack copyright.
Tell ya what: take the admission and prosecute to fullest extent of the law. I'm all for curtailing abuses by corporations.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: OOTB #41 Well, you guys say was no infringed content on Megaupload...
"Censor," in English, does not mean "reported by the community and hidden from the initial display, but available for reading with a single click."
Hey, put it online behind a paywall, sit back and watch the millions roll in!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Rotolight upgrade Rotolight ANOVA
Den Lennie checked out the New ANOVA's at IBc 2013 and said "New @Rotolight ANOVA V2 is V impressive. Great Colour output. Look forward to using it. G8 upgrade for existing V1 Owners too"
Den Lennie and Hollywood DoP Rodney Charters will be testing them out shortly. Check out Rodney Charters interview discussing the recent publicity and the new ANOVA's goo.gl/qXXyaj
Find out more about the Rotolight ANOVA upgrade programme www.rotolight.com/upgrade
[ link to this | view in thread ]