Government Considers Dissatisfaction With US Policies To Be A 'High Threat'
from the looks-like-someone's-going-to-spend-some-time-at-the-Ministry-of-Love! dept
The administration's "Insider Threat" program was discussed here a few weeks ago. Apparently, the government has been running dangerously low on whistleblowers to prosecute and now is seeking help from its employees in identifying "threats" to the government -- some of which may be no more than a cubicle away.
The national "spy on your neighbor" program (See Something, Say Something) has now been internalized by the government, which openly encourages its employees to view their co-workers with suspicion. Leaks = "aiding the enemy," according to official documents and one can't be too careful in this post-Snowden climate of forced transparency.
To that end, the government has introduced a couple of training modules/interactive games aimed at heightening suspicion levels in federal offices. There are two versions: one for the Dept. of Defense and one for regular "federal employees." You score points by following the rules and outing co-workers whose behavior indicates they might up and tear the country a new one by blowing whistles.
According to the interactive brainwasher CyberAwareness Challenge, these are some of the prime indicators that a co-worker is prone to rampant acts of insider threatening.
A security training test created by a Defense Department agency warns federal workers that they should consider the hypothetical Indian-American woman a "high threat" because she frequently visits family abroad, has money troubles and "speaks openly of unhappiness with U.S. foreign policy."
Yes. It's true. An inherently untrustworthy foreigner has made things worse on herself by exercising her First Amendment rights and openly having her vehicle repossessed. A good citizen loves our country's thousands of rules and policies and pays their bills on time -- no exceptions.
And who in their right, non-threatening mind would want to leave the country once, much less several times? Seriously. The hassle at the airports alone would seem to be enough to deter a non-Caucasian from making more than one trip abroad.
While this example may seem stupid at best and borderline racist at worst, a spokesman for the Pentagon defended the program's virtues in a statement to Huffington Post.
Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Damien Pickart said, "DISA was sensitive to any civil liberty concerns that might arise from any portion of the curriculum, which is why it coordinated with 26 federal agencies to ensure the maximum amount of input was received before going live."Anyone familiar with government work knows that increasing the number of agencies involved has very little bearing on overall quality of output. In fact, it's more frequently noted that the quality is inversely proportionate to the number of bureaucrats involved.
"When considering personnel for a position of trust that requires a security clearance, there are many potential indicators that must be considered when evaluating for insider threat concerns," he explained. "The department takes these variables into consideration based on past examples of personnel who engaged in spying or treasonous acts."
Several million people across the federal government have taken the training since it was released, Pickart said, and there has been only one complaint...
And as for there being only one complaint? Well, holy shit, what did you expect? The program itself makes the none-too-subtle point that complaining about the government is a great way to end up with the word "Snowden" taped surreptitiously to your back by your newly trained co-workers.
Now, if you're truly curious, you can attempt to play the interactive CyberAwareness Challenge. Chrome users are somewhat discouraged from making the attempt. My personal experience boiled down to a lot of load time broken up by occasional "challenges" and questions that had all the depth and nuance of a Dora the Explorer episode.
The challenge level may go up the further you proceed in the game, but I can't offer any insight on that. The load times are so long, it's tough to believe you'll have a chance to round up any "insider threats" before they've boarded the next plane to Moscow. Or retired.
All hyperbole aside, this training program won't do much to find insider threats, who are likely not nearly as easy to identify as the rather spurious list of "indicators" would have federal employees believe. And the last thing the government should be doing is incubating the idea that exposing government wrongdoing is only a step or two removed from actual terrorism. Attempting to weed out "dissent" by turning government employees against each other is only going to foster more of the behavior these agencies are trying to stamp out.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: free speech, government, threats, whistleblowers
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Obama, you're doing it wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
As a species, we just can't get enough copies of "Tin-Plated Dictatorship For Beginners". Some days human nature just depresses me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Excuse me, I've got a bestseller to write!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hello NSA, suck my plums.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=94zRy9zcUDI&t=6
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0811/61412.html
You'll never hear about change even if it's out there because the media is part of the machine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
There are no changes allowed in American elections. Only the marketing of change is allowed.
All candidates will be bought and paid for by corporate interests before they are placed on the ballot.
Sincerely,
Overlords of the New World Order
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Which could be better addressed by making financial advice services available to employees.
and if they are disenfranchised with politicly it makes then less likely to care about there commitment to keep stuff that should stay secret, secret.
I presume you meant "disenchanted".
Being disenchanted probably means you think more about politics than the uncritical person - and therefore you probably have a better idea about what really needs to be secret and what doesn't
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Basically, they're spending a lot of money on international travel, while not having enough to pay the bills...
Thing is, this is getting cross threaded with the whole ideology element. Past experience is, you need one OR the other to turn someone, not both. And, when I say "turn", I really mean a coordinated intelligence agency, not, you know, "terrerusts!"
Of course, the whole thing is made worse by the fact that we know, in this day and age, all bank seizures of property are legal, right guys?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Aug 8th, 2013 @ 9:13am
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So it begins, in earnest.
I wonder how long it will be before they start offering prizes for people to rat each other out? Here's your cheese your fucking rat! Now, what have you been up to???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.theguardian.com/law/2013/aug/08/david-cameron-human-rights-act?commentpage=3
G overnments all over the place are looking to turn their countries into police states.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Welcome
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's true, look it up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
There used to be a time where espionage (and counter-espionage) was a proper black art.
Now they've reduced it to guesswork and paranoia. Pathetic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Get a housekeeper in the Soviet embassy to throw out classified documents, and fish them out of the trash? Yeah, that worked for years.
Cultivate a spy network in East Berlin? No dice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
They also don't understand that "Muslim" isn't a race or that non-religious/Christian people of Arabic descent also exist.
Anyone who thinks they can tell if someone is a terrorist or a Muslim (and no, those are not synonyms) just by looking at them is a complete idiot.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And that complainant is now in federal custody undergoing re-education training in Room 101.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now they gonna have to watch everyone... oh wait...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Version 2
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Version 2
Any nominees for Charlie? I tend to forget names of unpleasant people, so I can't provide any for you. :-(
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Version 2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarthyism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stasi
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Version 2
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Version 2
There seem to be some similarities.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Version 2
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Version 2
It's the regular McCarthyism that scares me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Version 2
Now more than ever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...you might as well just use a dartboard. Only ignorant, stupid, vacuous, worthless, utterly idiotic simians think that security clearances have the slightest value. They might as well be printed on toilet paper, because they're exclusively for assholes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Money Issues
WRT Richard, when I was in the USAF 2 decades ago, access to simple financial advice services were available. Making them available does not mean one will necessarily use it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Do you see that!
She has provided "Adequate work quality"!
She is clearly a lazy-fat-stupid-video game playing-American hater!
The next time I see a co-worker completing their job in an adequate manner...well...never mind, that is pretty unlikely here anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What the government is trying to do here is twofold. Create a sense of fear among federal workers that they are being watched, and on the off chance, prevent a person from blowing the whistle on something illegal or unconstitutional.
Both of which are extremely stupid. This sort of work environment will create stressors for people, and will more than likely increase the number of people going public on illegal or unconstitutional government actions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Someone wanna call Oburmur's thugs? Can't be bothered to do it myself. I clearly should be locked up without a trial.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They have since asked the complainer (who did so anonymously, but the NSA knew who it was anyway) a series of questions in the comfort of a facility on an island known for great weather and fine cigars.
During this interview, the complainer retracted their complaint and admitted to terrorist activities and kidnapping the Lindburgh baby.
So, we re convinced that everyone feels the program is appropriate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Reacting to real world situations as a nation is the purview of very few people on a scale. Who in their right minds would want homogeny of thought on the front lines?
Idiots club only.
F-
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Only one complaint
I wonder what happened to the person that complained.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Only one complaint
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Only one complaint
The complainers went to their various supervisors and complained vigorously, and perhaps humorously. For example, in the late 80s, at an aerospace company, I went to my supervisor and asked to take my drug test at my desk, because I was very busy. In the staff meeting where they announced "random" "drug" "tests", I asked how big the bottle was, noting that I had a very large bladder.
That is, a lot/all of complaints just don't get past first level managers, no matter how biting the criticism is. Complaints certainly don't get past the department level manager, who will claim to have forwarded them "up the ladder", when in fact, the complaint paperwork went in the wastebasket.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Goddamn reds!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What is our world, and our country coming to? This type of approach immediately does 2 things that I'm concerned about...
1. It creates fear, especially the kind for "speaking out" in our supposedly free country.
2. This type of "training" immediately boxes people into categories, so BEFORE you meet a person, you've immediately classified them (within the context of employment at this Government agency).
You don't even get to know a person before they now must prove to you they don't fit this "box".
This. Is. Sad.
So because she has financial difficulties, travels to India, and speaks her mind... she is high risk.
Wow.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
good lord what kind of monster have I become?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custode?
I can't wait for this program to be updated in the near future; also making one a threat risk if they haven't reported a few colleagues in the last year or so under said program. This dog will forever chase it's wagging tail.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Giving Whistleblowers a Free Training Kit!
Call it the Snowden Effect. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think this is supposed to read
"DISA was sensitive to any civil liberty concerns that might arise from any portion of the curriculum, which is why it coordinated with 26 federal agencies to ensure the maximum amount of input was received and ignored before going live."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wondering
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Another good instruction manual to go with 1984.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Before we go blaming
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Student loans
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Content is everything
[ link to this | view in chronology ]