Rep. Justin Amash: House Intelligence Committee Withheld NSA Documents From Incoming Congressmen
from the Mike-Rogers'-streak-of-'dick-moves'-continues-unabated dept
Defenders of the NSA's program always point to two things: it's all legal and it's all subject to oversight. Part of the "oversight" is the FISA "thumbs up" system that has approved every request for two years in a row. The other part of the "oversight" is Congress itself.
Unfortunately, members of Congress have been lied to directly about the extent of the collections occurring under Section 215 (and 702), so that's one strike against the "oversight." Now, it appears that members of Congress are being selectively provided with information about the programs.
Rep. Justin Amash, (attempted) NSA defunder, posted this to his Facebook wall last night. It's a recently declassified document addressed to Mike Rogers and Dutch Ruppersberger. This cover letter accompanied documents detailing the bulk collections authorized by Sections 215 and 402 (pen register/trap and trace). [Click through to enlarge.]
At the beginning of the second paragraph, the cover letter (dated Feb. 2, 2011) notes:
We believe that making this document available to all Members of Congress, as we did with a similar document in 2009, is an effective way to inform the legislative debate about the reauthorization of Section 215.There's your "oversight" for you: the assistant attorney general calling for these documents to be shared with all Congress members in order to give them the oversight capabilities NSA spokesmen keep claiming is keeping the agency in check. Except, as Amash points out on his FB page, Mike Rogers and Dutch Ruppersberger never bothered sharing these documents.
Less than two weeks ago, the Obama administration released previously classified documents regarding #NSA's bulk collection programs and indicated that two of these documents had been made available to all Members of Congress prior to the vote on reauthorization of the Patriot Act. I can now confirm that the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence did NOT, in fact, make the 2011 document available to Representatives in Congress, meaning that the large class of Representatives elected in 2010 did not receive either of the now declassified documents detailing these programs.It appears the Committee was extremely selective (hence its name?) about who it would share these documents with. Incoming Congress members need not apply.
So, when Feinstein and others greeted the leaks with a shrug and a blase "We've known about this for years," there was probably some truth to those claims. Certain Representatives and Senators knew. Some even tried to warn the public. Still others had no idea, not until the details began appearing, not in security briefings, but at The Guardian and Washington Post.
Maybe the NSA really thought every representative was on the same page. Maybe it knew there were "gaps" in the oversight but didn't care. Considering its position as the most secretive of intelligence agencies, it probably figured the smaller the loop, the better.
According to this document, it was left in the hands of Mike Rogers and Dutch Ruppersberger to disperse the information to the other members of Congress. And it appears they chose not to.
"Oversight" like this, based on selective inclusion, is a joke -- something that affects all Americans is guided into the hands of a chosen few, most of whom wholeheartedly support the NSA's programs. Mike Rogers continues to mold the "oversight" into his own image, withholding these documents in 2011 and, more recently, denying crucial information on the FISA court and the PRISM program to representatives who wished to use it to get up to speed before the vote on Amash's NSA-directed amendment.
This isn't "oversight." This is Mike Rogers abusing his position to control the narrative and keep the NSA running smoothly, safely hidden away from those tasked with overseeing these surveillance programs. The NSA and its defenders can talk all they want about "oversight," but this is nothing more than Rogers carving out a fiefdom at the expense of the American public.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: congress, house intelligence committee, justin amash, mike rogers, nsa, nsa surveillance, oversight
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If direct lawsuit threats don't work you can always go copyright for some free censorship ;)
Now, on a more serious note: Rogers deliberately lies and upholds information from the Congress. I shall await his punishment.
Ninja and a few techdirt readers after 100 years of waiting for politician misdeeds to be punished
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Focusing on Rogers avoids the huge SYSTEMIC problem.
Just save time and fretting: mark Congress off your list of agents of change, because matters are now way past that stage, they've ALL proven either corrupt or ineffective.
It's time for Populism, another New Deal to again level the playing field against The Rich who own the corporations which own the gov'ts.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This is sanctionable activity.
He should be sanctioned and removed from the "House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence".
Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice, shame on me.
Don't trust him.
No trust, at all.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Least Untruth
Why doesn't everyone just understand that the second part of the sentence is automatically inferred?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
just wondering
hmmmm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
We Need Music for Change
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I'm wondering also......
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: just wondering
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I'm wondering also......
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
As Douglas said...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Least Untruth
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Right wing nonsense like rw's just makes people like rw look like dumb rednecks.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: We Need Music for Change
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: just wondering
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Least Untruth
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I'm wondering also......
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: just wondering
I burn my BDSM porn to DVDRs as a backup. :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]