White House Tried To Interfere With Washington Post's Report, And To Change Quotes From NSA
from the not-the-crime,-but-the-cover-up dept
Among the many, many incredible revelations from the Washington Post report on the abuses by the NSA is a tidbit about an interview that the Post was able to do with the NSA's director of compliance, John DeLong, followed by the White House's attempt to completely whitewash the interview and block his quotes from being used, despite the Post being told otherwise initially:The Obama administration referred all questions for this article to John DeLong, the NSA’s director of compliance, who answered questions freely in a 90-minute interview. DeLong and members of the NSA communications staff said he could be quoted “by name and title” on some of his answers after an unspecified internal review. The Post said it would not permit the editing of quotes. Two days later, White House and NSA spokesmen said that none of DeLong’s comments could be quoted on the record and sent instead a prepared statement in his name. The Post declines to accept the substitute language as quotations from DeLong.Read that again. This is the same White House that has been saying that they want to be as transparent as possible and to rebuild trust. And yet, here they are trying to block the Post from using an interview -- an interview they suggested in the first place -- and then to replace it with a bland and bogus "statement."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: journalism, nsa, quotes, transparency
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The solution to this problem.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I mean, telling a newspaper it can't use an interview? Really?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More than 300? More like under a 1000.
The way he phrased it as "more than 300" for the NSA's internal privacy compliance program makes it sound like there's under a thousand personnel for that particular program.
Remind me: how many people does the NSA employ again?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No! Really? -- Now what about NSA's actual CRIMES?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No! Really? -- Now what about NSA's actual CRIMES?
..
nevermind, I Googled it. Fuck me, they're Googling us! Now Google is going to see that I Googled the NSA and the NSA is going to Google Google and see I've been Googling them and now the NSA is going to Google me back! This is .. preposterous!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: No! Really? -- Now what about NSA's actual CRIMES?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No! Really? -- Now what about NSA's actual CRIMES?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No! Really? -- Now what about NSA's actual CRIMES?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
roughly translated, seems to say
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I guess it's time I stop mocking China's censorship
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I guess it's time I stop mocking China's censorship
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I guess it's time I stop mocking China's censorship
"China is here, Mr. Burton."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I guess it's time I stop mocking China's censorship
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Actually, I think he has been replaced by a robot that simply spews out whatever the NSA types into it's real-time link.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Scenario 2: The White House and the NSA used Mr. Delong as a cats-paw, never intending his remarks to made public and relying on vague statements to generate reader burnout or apathy to make the whole thing go away. Conclusion - The U.S. government perceives its citizenry as morons who are easily distracted.
Mr. Obama, the internet is filled with OCDs who WILL pay attention, who WILL dig into every attempt to use the 'Look, Squirrel!' ploy. Try the truth sometime - you may be surprised to learn most citizens are mature enough to realize that HOW mistakes are handled is often more important than the mistakes themselves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Now, can we all vote Obama off the island before the next commercial?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Remember when Obama used to admit he screwed up?
Good times.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trust
It is fairly disturbing how much Obama seems bothered that there are still some people out there that do not fawn all over everything he does.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Trust
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Each day seems to bring another black mark against the practices of spying on Americans.
Here's a news flash! The terrorists are over seas. They are not here in huge numbers. Despite all the attempts at making it look like they are everywhere by the FBI's setup cases.
It is time to call an end to the authority of this mass spying on its own people. Here is where real budget cutting can happen and be meaningful in its results.
Again I still hear no call for a special investigator not linked to those in charge. No call for impeachment. No call for serious changes. Coverup can only take you so far. After that it begins to look like just what it is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Aug 16th, 2013 @ 12:07pm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You're using the wrong definition of Transparency
> saying that they want to be as transparent as possible
They are using a Secret definition of transparency.
Hope that helps.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How exactly does caving in to White House censorship demands hold the government accountable? If they're so committed to those high minded ideals what stopped them from publishing the quotes unedited?
Mostly they would have been taken off the super privileged media guest list. Instead of getting their lies in person they'd get them second hand like the commoners. No more official unofficial leaks from the President.
I can think of a lot of words to describe that - sycophant, toadie, boot licker, lackey, flunky, maybe even accomplice or co-conspirator. Journalist not so much.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Threshold
I swear, the threshold has been crossed. It's seriously ridiculous.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In the words of Instapundit ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]