Guantanamo Bay Authorities Ban Solzhenitsyn's 'The Gulag Archipelago'
from the stranger-than-fiction dept
Some stories, you just couldn't make up. Like this one, reported on the UK site Reprieve, about a failed attempt to pass some reading material to one of the people detained at Guantanamo Bay. Something unsuitable you might guess, perhaps advocating terrorist ways? Well, not exactly:
The legal team for Shaker Aamer, a British resident who has been detained in Guantanamo without charge or trial for 11 years, attempted to deliver a copy of The Gulag Archipelago by Alexander Solzhenitsyn during a recent visit.
Of course, this isn't the first time that 'The Gulag Archipelago' has had problems with the authorities: when it was completed in 1968, it had to be smuggled out of the Soviet Union on microfilm so that it could be published in the West. Here's what Wikipedia has to say on the book and its importance:
However, Mr Aamer has now told his lawyers that he never received the book.Solzhenitsyn argued that the Soviet government could not govern without the threat of imprisonment, and that the Soviet economy depended on the productivity of the forced labor camps, especially insofar as the development and construction of public works and infrastructure were concerned.
Now why on earth would any of that be problematic for the Guantanamo Gulag, er, Bay authorities, I wonder...?
This put into doubt the entire moral standing of the Soviet system. In Western Europe the book eventually forced a rethinking of the historical role of Lenin. With The Gulag Archipelago, Lenin's political and historical legacy became problematic, and the factions of Western communist parties who still based their economic and political ideology on Lenin were left with a heavy burden of proof against them. George F. Kennan, the influential U.S. diplomat, called The Gulag Archipelago, "the most powerful single indictment of a political regime ever to be levied in modern times."
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: gitmo, guantanamo, solzhenitsyn, the gula archipelago
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Too many similarities for comfort I wonder?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What else do you reckon is banned?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not a suprise with the Police State the US has become
[ link to this | view in thread ]
a British resident who has been detained in Guantanamo without charge or trial for 11 years
Eleven fucking years incarcerated without charges. How many times this Government condemned Human Rights violations and similar stuff in the last decade? And yet there is at least one man that's detained without a freaking charge. That's plain disgusting. North Korea does that too, you know?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jack Bauer: the American role-model
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Jack Bauer: the American role-model
Read this list of the 45 declared goals of communism, taken from The Naked Communist, to see just how far they're infiltrated the social and political landscape here in America.
http://rense.com/general32/americ.htm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Jack Bauer: the American role-model
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Jack Bauer: the American role-model
President Obama is not without guilt. He has repeatedly reversed course on any number of topics that are cornerstone to maintaining a free society. However, put the blame where it accurately lies. Neither political party/ideology is without blame here.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Once he came into office, that promise was abandoned.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I think Guantanamo has become a clear example of how stupid it is to treat prisoners like this. Both from a human right perspective and a legal perspective. Hopefully the government has written "never again" on this stupidity. It is the only way to avoid this crappy situation.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The American Dream
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-prison-industry-in-the-united-states-big-business-or-a-ne w-form-of-slavery/8289
check.
Perhaps you can also count that economy of especially the southern states needs the cheap labour of the immigrants, which can remain cheap because they get next to no rights. Not exaclty imprisoned, but still.
How many steps behind? The US may be ahead already.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Jack Bauer: the American role-model
You are the reason this country is shit.
you don't think for yourself or even see the strings attached to you.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Jack Bauer: the American role-model
The problem stems from the fact that most of the goals mentioned are explicitly liberal, but the end result is the same regardless: big government, same as communism in all but name, invading every facet of our lives, telling us what to think and how to act.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Jack Bauer: the American role-model
Yes, 'progressive liberals,' as anyone can readily see how many of the communist goals listed they make a part of their political agenda. The book The Naked Communist was written in, what, 1963? It's rather scary how much they've managed to accomplish. We're truly being destroyed from within.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Jack Bauer: the American role-model
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Mark my words.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This is the single most disturbing thing about all of this to me. I don't even care about the book. I am just pissed that someone could lose a decade+ of their life to the gov, without even being charged with a crime.
The extra-legal dealings of this government have gone so far. They are adept at going not-quite-far-enough as to foment full scale armed revolution.
Franklin, Jefferson, Washington would be pissed at all of us.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Gitmo and the Gulag
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: What else do you reckon is banned?
;)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Jack Bauer: the American role-model
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Jack Bauer: the American role-model
But hell since you responded, I might as well respond sensibly.
Ends don't justify the means, which is the root of the problem with communism. Liberals don't like communism. It's violent. Socialism is a democratic approach. The masses debate and vote on which and how much of certain things should be taken. Much like conservatives should vote and debate on how much of certain things should be taken.
A communist violently kicks(mostly shoots) everyone out and sets the new rules.
liberals and conservatives battle with words and we reach a point to hopefully keep the most possible people happy.
Your talk of communism is distracting from any valid point you may have and pointing fingers at any one group at this point is pure madness. We've had two different administrations ride through all of this doing the same damn thing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Jack Bauer: the American role-model
Any sane person can see the slow, methodical destruction. Socialism inevitably leads to communism, because by its very nature it creates a system wherein everyone is dependent upon big government. When the latter owns, regulates and controls everything, you have communism and communism invariably leads to mass genocide.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Jack Bauer: the American role-model
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Don't lose any sleep ove the guys in Gitmo. They are there for a reason.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
People accused of the worst crimes around still get trials, still get to defend themselves in court, the idea that claiming(because if they could prove it, they would have) that someone is a 'terrorist' suddenly makes stripping them of the most basic human rights and imprisoning them without trial acceptable is dead wrong, it's still a gross injustice, and an affront to the very core of 'innocent until proven guilty', something that any real justice system has as it's foundation.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Jack Bauer: the American role-model
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
And what is the reason that they are there other than some sociopath trying to look "tough on terror" and drumming up complete bullshit fears that somehow holding trial for a captive and under excessive-guard prisoner on our soil is "too dangerous to transfer". They're people held on dubious at the very best grounds for a decade. Not some sort of mutant psychic superman who when traveling can make the heads of anyone they can see explode with a thought, let off a nuclear explosion where they stand and be unharmed, and fire superheated plasma out of their asses! If you can't prevent them from being dangerous with an overkill squad of eight armed guards you should be fired for utter incompetence.
[ link to this | view in thread ]