Reporter Toobin Lashes Out At Reporters Who Use 'Stolen' Documents; Leaves Out His Own History Of Doing The Same
from the it's-just-not-civilized-to-do-real-reporting dept
David Carr, over at the NY Times, has a good article looking at how many of the people who have been involved in reporting on recent leaks concerning government abuses -- from Wikileaks to the Snowden leaks -- have been attacked by more "traditional" journalists, like David Gregory of Meet the Press and Jeffrey Toobin of CNN and the New Yorker. Carr says that this is the war on leaks, "pitting journalist v. journalist," but others have noted that it's a little more involved than that. Ryan Singel simplified it down to journalists vs. sycophants, since those complaining about Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras, Julian Assange and others tend to be "insider" journalists -- those who rely on good relationships with government officials to "report" the news. Mathew Ingram, similarly, noted that the old school journalists were dealing with "the shock of inclusion," in that journalism is now done in a different way, and they don't like it.The unavoidable sense one gets — not just from Carr's piece, but from all the other responses by Gregory and others to the NSA story and to WikiLeaks, and even to events like Reddit's attempt to contribute to the reporting around the Boston bombings — is of an "us vs. them" mentality, in which bloggers like Greenwald or more extreme personalities like Julian Assange are treated like invaders storming the barricades of the journalism establishment. As Carr puts it:Carr also has this interesting exchange with Toobin, who has been among the angriest haters against Snowden, Greenwald and the rest:“The larger sense I get from the criticism directed at Mr. Assange and Mr. Greenwald is one of distaste — that they aren’t what we think of as real journalists. Instead, they represent an emerging Fifth Estate composed of leakers, activists and bloggers who threaten those of us in traditional media. They are, as one says, not like us.”
Mr. Toobin agrees that an important debate has been joined, but says no story, no matter how big, justifies journalists’ abetting illegal acts, saying, “Journalists are not above the law.”That seems especially ironic, given that just last week it came out that Toobin himself has been accused of taking a ton of classified documents for a book he was writing:
“The Jane Mayers, Sy Hershes and Walter Pincuses have all done superb work for decades without the rampant lawlessness that was behind these stories,” he said, adding later, “I’ve never heard any of those journalists endorsing the wholesale theft of thousands of classified government records.”
In journalist Michael Isikoff’s book, Uncovering Clinton: A Reporter’s Story, he described how Toobin was caught “having absconded with large loads of classified and grand-jury related documents from the office of Iran-Contra independent counsel Lawrence Walsh” in 1991:Read that again, then go back and read Toobin's whining to David Carr. And try not to choke back the laughter. Toobin isn't upset that documents were taken as a part of journalism, since it appears that he, himself, had no problem with that. He's upset that it's used in a way that he doesn't like.Toobin, it turned out, had been using his tenure in Walsh’s office to secretly prepare a tell-all book about the Iran-contra case; the privileged documents, along with a meticulously kept private diary (in which the young Toobin, a sort of proto-Linda Tripp, had been documenting private conversations with his unsuspecting colleagues) were to become his prime bait to snare a book deal. Toobin’s conduct enraged his fellow lawyers in Walsh’s office, many of whom viewed his actions as an indefensible betrayal of the public trust. Walsh at one point even considered pressing for Toobin’s indictment.
Toobin was “petrified” that he would have to face criminal charges for stealing information for a rather dubious book deal. According to Isikoff, he either “feared dismissal and disgrace, or simply wanted to move on.” Toobin “resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office in Brooklyn (where he had gone to work after Walsh) and abandoned the practice of law.”
It is true that there are differences between many of those old school journalists and the new school who are breaking all of this news. The old school tried to buddy up with government sources to get their story. The new school would rather get the story. Apparently that upsets the old school, because it makes their
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: activism, david carr, glenn greenwald, jeffrey toobin, journalism, laura poitras, leaks
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He used to be a journalist
We are all hypocrites to an extent, but we are usually aware of it. They must be narcissists. How else can you explain their disregard for reality about themselves.
Toobin is "obviously" a better journalist in his head.
Authoritarian narcissist pretending to be a journalist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
There ya go. Vote for this comment all you wish gys
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Lol. That's why I didn't re-quote it here in the comments.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Posted before, but still relevant:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Posted before, but still relevant:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
From Iran-contra to the NSA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran-contra
Robert McFarlane resigned on December 4, 1985,[31][32] citing that he wanted to spend more time with his family.[33] He was replaced by Admiral John Poindexter.[34]
Did someone say John Poindexter?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Poindexter
From January 2002 to August 2003, Poindexter served as the Director of the DARPA Information Awareness Office (IAO).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Awareness_Office
On November 14, 2002, The New York Times published a column by William Safire in which he claimed "[TIA] has been given a $200 million budget to create computer dossiers on 300 million Americans."[31] Safire has been credited with triggering the anti-TIA movement.[32]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Old school?
I don't know that it's so much "old school vs new school", as it is "middle school vs new school". Plenty of old-school journalists believed in the importance of "speaking truth to power"; sadly, their kind of journalism died out in the past few decades as news media became increasingly more indebted to the Washington and Wall Street elite. In their place we got the "middle school" journalists who are more about developing powerful connections than challenging power. (Bill Moyers had an excellent interview and essay last week that dealt with this. billmoyers.com/segment/bill-moyers-essay-the-end-game-for-democracy/ ) Now, we have the new school come to challenge them, so naturally they're feeling threatened.
...
And of course there's always the "hey-you-punk-kids-get-off-my-lawn" factor, which seems to happen with every generation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Old school?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Old school?
"Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed. Everything else is public relations." - George Orwell, British writer (1903-1950)
Fact is both Journalism and Public Relations have sort of co-existed for quite some time now. And honestly we need a bit of both. I do not condemn those journalists that get in good terms with Govt officials and the ones in power so they can dive deeper in that realm. I do condemn when they just report on an issue with complete lack of critical thinking. One thing is to be soft not to upset your connections, another is to blatantly ignore reality. Another condemnable behavior from those people is exactly what's happening now: lashing out at those who do the heavy investigative work. You see, these guys are as important as they are. There's no need for "us vs them" because each portion has their own importance and none can really replace the other.
There are those that went from being the truly investigative ones to being the ones relying on connections and maybe those are what you can call old school journalists but the terms old shcool and new school are not enough to define what's happening. And it falls back to the millenniums old clash between generations which is a really bad thing. A much more reasonable path would be of cooperation where the old don't limit the new and the new don't dismiss the old experiences as if they don't matter.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
korporate media turns journalism upside down...
kampers, do NOT forget: the sea eye ehh, etc HAVE and no doubt still do, recruit, influence, or simply *are* numerous 'journalists' in amerika...
*SOMEONE* has to be the spook's water carriers, could be toobin as well as any number of sycophantic 'reporters'...
just sayin'...
oh, and he's slime, regardless of being spooked up...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Whats this article about
Good luck with that. People don't generally consider you a journalist, even if you think you are.
Journalist's do journalism. Journalists generally don't spend their time talking about other journalists, or copy and pasting their work.
They do their own stuff.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
wow Masnick you worked out censorship now
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Must be great having everyone agree with you
I note it has resulted in a far less interesting site, and less page hits.. So you lose every way, even money..
All because you want to censor people..
You might as well do what PJ did and shut the web page down, if all you are willing to do is talk to people who agree with you..
Makes coming to this site for discussion or debate pointless.
You might as well just email your 'posts' to the 10 or so people who accept the crap you talk.
RIP Free Speech..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Alternate explanation
Or, maybe he's jealous that these others didn't chicken out the way he did.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Matt Ingram
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Matt Ingram
Well, if for a moment you can stomach the idea of his drawings making him a "journalist," much like "Toolbin" fellow he either is — or longs to be — part of the corporate elite/in-crowd with access, what with his immersive obsession with the usability of corporations' intelligence-gathering social-media ass-fuckery, shameless product placements, and embrace of out-of-control "imaginary property 'rights'."
See his "State of the Web" drawings for examples of corporate propagandizing run amok.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Using 'blogger' as a derogatory term
Is it because his content doesn't regularly appear in print anywhere? Is the the only difference?
I used to think those doling out the special 'journalism' title just go by whether someone works for an actual newspaper. But he works for the Guardian, for goodness sake. Does that not count?
To a huge number of people, a blog means either amateur or off-the-cuff (little research) type of writing. Certainly anyone who's followed Greenwald over the past few years can't say either thing applies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My reply to this:
If every individual is a member of the militia, for Second Amendment purposes, then also recognize that every individual is a member of the free press, for First Amendment purposes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Therefore we ALL should have 'free press' rights REGARDLESS of whether we are formal journalists or not.
Thank you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]