Canadian Member Of Parliament, Responsible For Opposition Trade Policy, Denied Access To TPP Negotiations
from the that-doesn't-sound-right dept
Defenders of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations in the US like to note that every member of Congress has access to the negotiating documents of the massive trade agreement. Of course, that's not telling the full story. While lobbyist "advisers" like those from the MPAA can simply log into an online account and see the details from their personal computers, members of Congress have to go to the USTR office, where they can see a copy of the document, but they're not allowed to bring any staffers (such as those who are experts on trade policy), nor are they allowed to make any copies or take any notes.However, it appears that up in Canada, things may be even more ridiculous. Don Davies is a Canadian Member of Parliament who notes that he's been denied access to information about the ongoing TPP negotiations, of which Canada is supposedly a member:
“The TPP is a sweeping agreement covering issues that affect many areas of Canada’s economy and society – including several areas of policy that have never been subject to trade agreements before,” said Davies. “By keeping Parliament completely in the dark on negotiations the Conservatives also leave Canadians in the dark and, for an agreement of this magnitude that is abnormal and unacceptable.In this case, it's doubly ridiculous. Davies is a member of the NDP party, which is not in power, but his role is as the Official Opposition Critic for International Trade. In other words, he's basically the trade policy expert for the NDP, and as such, you'd think he should at the very least be included in the details of ongoing negotiations. Yet again, though, it seems that the main negotiating parties involved in the TPP have realized that the best way to get across an agreement they like is to keep it as secretive and non-transparent as possible, especially from critics. This is the exact opposite of how democratic governments are supposed to work.
“If the US can allow its legislators to see the TPP text, there is no reason that Canada can’t,” Davies said.
Of course, the addition of Canada to the TPP has always been done in a way to keep our neighbor up north as a silent partner to the US's position. You may recall that the US didn't let Canada join until well into the negotiating process, and as part of the invite, Canada was told that it had to accept all negotiated text without question, even though it wasn't allowed to see it yet. And, related to that, they had to agree to future texts during some meetings where they weren't allowed to attend. To now find out that the Conservative Party, which is currently in power, is going even further and blocking the opposition from having any visibility at all into the agreement is just ridiculous.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: access, canada, don davies, ndp, tpp, transparency
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Democracy
If the United States government insists on leaving the people out of the loop then it falls to the people to find out for itself. Remember the days when spies used to take microfilm images of secret documents? It's old technology, but it may still be useful in cases such as these.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Democracy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seems very reasonable. We all sign stuff this way don't we? /sarcasm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
germany , UK , canada say no to syrian war
thats the nation you live in.
OH i agree we should all get along but how can we ...WHEN YOUR SPYING ON US ALL AND WILL NEVER SHOW US ANY PROOF WHAT YOU SAY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: germany , UK , canada say no to syrian war
Can't really back either side, 'cause the only thing they have in common is a hatred of the West.
I'm not really sure what anyone expects out of any military action.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: germany , UK , canada say no to syrian war
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Negotiated in secret?
I read in an article that they keep telling us that these negotiations couldn't proceed if they'd do it publicly, because people...
That's the fuckin' point: people don't like it. The don't do it - in their name.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"U.S. members of Congress can request access to the draft documents, but are required to keep secret about what they see. All the same, a few have hinted at what they’ve seen.
Rep. Alan Grayson, a Florida Democrat, said he had seen the text and said the agreement, as it stands, “hands the sovereignty of our country over to corporate interests.”
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh Cana-duh
I say if they don't like the terms of joining into the agreement, don't do it. It's not like they're being forced to become a part of it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh Cana-duh
I'm not sure if you're referring to Canada in general or Davis in particular. If it's Canada in general, then I fully agree and I think it's sad the way we kowtow to US interests.
If you're referring to Davies, the way the headline is worded is a tad misleading for anyone not familiar with Parliamentary system. Davies himself has no power to set trade policy. He's just supposed to keep an eye on (and criticize) the Minister for International Trade, Ed Fast.
Fast is a member of the Conservative party, who currently have a majority government and can do whatever they want regardless of what the opposition thinks, including signing us up for oppressive international treaties without letting the opposition even see the text.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Oh Cana-duh
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Oh Cana-duh
Plus the Canadian government is kinda bad.. I'm not even sure if there's a government anymore given how they rarely come out to say anything.. Only when shit goes bad..
Not to mention how eager the government is to adopt anything the USA do adopt !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cons in Canada
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cons in Canada
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Then show up at the meetings and arrest them
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No
Damn why dont they just tell Canada they are another state and start paying taxes and changing all their laws to be the same as any other state in the Unites States.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]