Why Was Court's Secret Interpretation Of The PATRIOT Act Ever Secret In The First Place?
from the makes-no-sense dept
So, yesterday the FISA court (FISC) finally declassified one of its PATRIOT Act Section 215 orders to the telcos, demanding a full collection of every phone record. This revealed some of the secret interpretation of the PATRIOT Act that some in Congress had been asking the administration to reveal for many years.Here's the part I don't understand: why was this ever secret in the first place?
The FISC (and the NSA and its defenders) have continued to insist that the whole thing is completely reasonable and legal, and well within the confines of what's allowed by Section 215 (ignoring that the author of it claims he wrote it to prevent exactly this kind of data collection). If that's true, then why was it secret? If the FISC and the NSA and its defenders insist that the plain language of the law allowed exactly this kind of interpretation all along, why did they hide it and say it needed to be classified? Yes, there are some redacted bits in the declassified document, but that could have been done earlier.
Also, remember, this particular FISC ruling was written in July, well after the Snowden leaks had begun. You can kind of sense from the way it's written that the FISC was writing this not for its usual audience, but rather for the public that was going to read it soon enough. Even so, nothing in the reasoning that was declassified seems like it ever should have been classified in the first place, if those in the government (and the court) really believed that they were legit. The only reason I can see to have classified those decisions was because they knew that their interpretation of the law was suspect, and would likely lead to public outcry and potential legal challenges.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: fisc, patriot act, privacy, secrecy, section 215
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
One thing I've learned in life...
Believe me, it ALWAYS makes it worse. Not just the punishment that will happen, but the fact that trust will be destroyed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: One thing I've learned in life...
This is a life lesson many of us learned sometime between the ages of three and four. It often involves an attempt to reassemble a broken item with glue and ends up with an explanation of why your hands are stuck together.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Or better yet, to delay any attempt of pushing back the surveillance State as much as possible in the event it actually happened.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's not democracy. Nor is it even a proper court when court rulings can not be verified to actually have been done without the consent of the one being ruled over.
This whole business is a sham and as crooked as a three card monte game. We the American public are expected to play the role of the mark. I don't accept that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Unfortunately, the information you have requested is classified due to national security.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Too many secrets, too many lies
How can we trust anything these people say, do, or propose to do?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's a giveaway, to put out and distract from far worse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"If you got nothing to hide...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You just answered your own question.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The second rule about Secret Spy Court is, Don't talk about Secret Spy Court.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More power = more corruption
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Secret Interpretation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]