The One Telco Exec Who Resisted The NSA Has Been Released From 4+ Years In Jail
from the tell-it-like-it-is dept
If you were around during the reign of Joe Nacchio at Qwest, you already should be aware that he was not particularly well-liked. He was brash and obnoxious and often rubbed people the wrong way. There's a famous story, for example, of him calling up an executive at US West, a company that Qwest bought, which had a building directly across the street from Qwest's headquarters. Moments after the buyout closed, Nacchio got the exec on the phone and supposedly told him he had 15 minutes to change the sign on the building from US West to Qwest. Qwest collapsed in a somewhat spectacular manner not long after that, with some comparing it to the Enron collapse -- a lot of hype and stock pumping built on very little substance. A few years later, Nacchio was famously convicted of insider trading -- and certainly many people who had witnessed his earlier antics reveled in that result.
However, it was only later that it started to come out that Nacchio was alone among all of the major telco execs to tell the NSA to get lost when they came calling, demanding the ability to basically tap Qwest's entire network. For years, Nacchio has insisted that the entire lawsuit against him was retaliation for his refusal. When he first made those claims, it sounded far fetched and ridiculous. However, in the intervening years, as more and more details of the NSA's activities have become clear, Nacchio's initial arguments seem a hell of a lot more plausible.
It turns out that Nacchio was just released from prison after his 54 month sentence was completed. The WSJ has an odd but entertaining (and unfortunately paywalled -- though, you can get around it if you Google the title) article about his life in prison, where he apparently came out much healthier than he went in (lots of exercise) and is now best buddies with some former drug dealers who had his back in prison. One of whom, who goes by the name Spoonie, calls Nacchio "Joe-ski-luv" and says that they're best friends. "If he ever needs a lung or a bone, I'm there." Right.
But, more interesting is the tidbit further down about the NSA stuff:
Mr. Nacchio said he still believes his insider-trading prosecution was government retaliation for rebuffing requests in 2001 from the National Security Agency to access his customers' phone records. His plans to use that belief as a defense at trial never materialized; some of the evidence he wanted to use was deemed classified and barred from being introduced.I would imagine that Nacchio could add quite a bit of useful information to the ongoing debate. And, in fact, it appears he intends to do so, with plans to write a book about "Americans' loss of liberty based on his experiences with the NSA and other government agencies." I look forward to reading it.
To Mr. Nacchio, the revelations of former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, who leaked documents saying the agency monitors the email and phone records of Americans, have justified his own stance. He contended the NSA's request was illegal.
"I feel vindicated," he said. "I never broke the law, and I never will."
An NSA spokeswoman declined to comment.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: insider trading, jail, joe nacchio, joseph nacchio, nsa, nsa surveillance
Companies: qwest
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Re: Re: America stands for this...
I think we're very much waking up to that, and we realize it isn't pretty, but hey, if you want to be honest, let's be totally honest: The rest of the world should realize, especially with all these leaked revelations, that the American government has not been acting with the approval or in the best interests of the American people for quite some time. That cowboy image applies well to our government...but our people deal with problems of their own just like people in every other country. Troubled kids shooting up schools is not a good example to generalize into "Americans," considering what a ridiculously small percentage it is. It's like generalizing all Muslims as terrorists, and we should all know by now that's not true, not appropriate to insinuate, and insulting to millions of people who do not deserve it.CommonSense
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Greater good or not is irrelevant when it comes to the foundation this nation was built upon. These things are non negotiable plain and simple.
Snowden should have never happened.
This Exec should have never happened.
WikiLeaks should have never happened.
I don't mean that the should have kept their mouths shut I just mean the officials we entrust this nations power to should not be betraying us. We used 9/11 to destroy the American dream and that makes me sick.
I love what my country is supposed to stand for.
I should love my government
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
"I love what my country is supposed to stand for."
What exactly is America supposed to stand for?
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: America stands for this...
Indeed, just checking the BS meter and wondering how many Americans still subscribe to the propaganda. Most people believe what they're told to believe while children, and those beliefs are hard to change when they're adult.
Land of the free? Bollocks. Home of the brave? Bollocks. Land of the psychopathic cowboy with spurs that jingle-jangle-jingle? Without a doubt, Americans just love to shoot up people and when they can't do it to a smaller, poor and often defenceless nation, why then they do it to themselves in their schools and Navy yards.
Americans badly need to wake up to the way the rest of the world sees them, and it isn't pretty.
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: America stands for this...
CommonSense
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: America stands for this...
Its like saying that AIDS is not a problem because it only affects a ridiculously small percentage of the population, or that the Wall Street pillagers should not be prosecuted because they're only a small percentage of the population.
One should not look at the perpetration rate but at the social impact, and the social impact of the gun-toting, swaggering cowboy Americans is dire. Just dire.
None-the less, I really do hope you are right and that Americans are starting to awaken from their propaganda-driven nightmare. It's about time.
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: America stands for this...
What you're doing is twisting my words to make it look like I think troubled kids are not a problem that we should deal with, but that's not what I said, nor what I think. There was a school shooting in a different country the other day, but surely you're not ready to say that everyone in that country is a gun-toting, bullet happy, cowboy, are you?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: America stands for this...
Either hypocrisy or lack of awareness. Still both a common human trace (me included).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: America stands for this...
So you'll buy into the negative propaganda, but not the positive. I've yet to meet anyone who actually meets this stereotype.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: America stands for this...
America needs to take care of business in America. Personally, when it has no poverty, when all children can read and wite when they leave school and when the yardie gangsta culture (one of the biggest impact and disastrous exports to UK (for example). When all this has been fixed. along with AIDS infection rate and the drug abuse rate, then I will take morality and 'Godliness' lessons from America. Until then, you guys just make fools of yourselves.when you sermonise.
Obama: "America shines a light on the world". Not in this universe it doesn't. maybe in some parallel universe. Obama the Hopeless is now firmly in the same category as Ronnie Raygun and 'Dubya' Bush. Everything about America and Americans can be explained by the fact that they elected these intellectually and emotionally handicapped people to represent them.
Annie.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: America stands for this...
The reality is, a recent local election had 42% or so participation. That is, only roughly 40% of people eligible even bothered to vote. So, by majority, the "will of the people", the winner is "no one."
But that is not what they do. They stick whoever had the most.
IF you want to say Americans have a broken system where the people's voice does not matter, that is one thing. But please do not say we elected them. The truth is, the people's voice is ignored, and pre-selected dummies are the only choices that are allowed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: America stands for this...
They have the highest prison population in the world both in total number and percentage of population. See http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/uk/06/prisons/html/nn2page1.stm
They are home to the NRA, as terrorist organisations go, I have seen those loonies interviewed,they frighten me far more than any Muslim Jihad. AND they are the Stereotypical US citizen rabid, ignorant and incapable of logical argument. If in doubt listen to there guys http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZb8EXUrQTo Dave Keene does not even know his nationality.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: America stands for this...
"I am not sure if it is poor education, laziness or conceit."
Yes.
Glad to see I'm not the only one in here with a dismal view of America and Americans. Some years ago, I was enchanted to hear some numbskull saying how she expected to do well commercially in Australia. "After all" she said (presumably with a straight face though it was on the radio so I only had her voice to go on), "they are American-speaking over there".
I had to stop the car I was laughing so hard. The Auussies refer to Americans as 'septic tanks" presumably on account of what they're full of… but that's just a guess.
Annie.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: America stands for this...
there are people who do meet this stereotype, but it is largely "that's for you to believe" and they don't actually believe it themselves, it is just to put you in your place, while they continue pillaging, lying, and cheating.
this is what government propaganda is -- they don't actually buy it, it is for you to buy.
There are still a smaller few who actually do believe such things and aren't just selling you a story, but even then, it is rarely someone believes it and more they stand to gain by selling you that story.
No, there is noone (over the age of 8) who actually believes it. However, you act like that makes the propaganda less effective.
If your house is flooding, it matters little if the water is 6 feet high or 5 feet. A flood is a flood, and it should be stopped. Until then, it is POINTLESS to say "I don't see anyone who denies there is a flood" and it is near-POINTLESS to whine when you see a few leftovere excess drops fall from the faucet. The damage has already been done at that point.
Stop the flood, and then you can worry about the "leaky faucet."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I hope you don't mean to imply that overall the US got worse during the last almost-a-century. Almost a century ago was when the US had Jim Crow, and if you go even further back you get to slavery and native genocide.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
None of which seem to be in large supply for the élites.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
shocked... just shocked...
that the people who called these ideas the musings of crackpots seem to have a big freaking plate of crow to start eating.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Could one sue the government for something like that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Could one sue the government for something like that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BBC: Ruses that spring from Brazil's woes
It also reminds me of Tony the evil one.
Quote:
Wikipedia: Antônio Carlos Magalhães
You think those things should happen only in other countries but not in the US, but that would be naive, politics in America are every bit as ruthless as anywhere else, we have our own evil ones too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Most of the 2n and 3rd worlds prize personal relationships above the law and principle, it's their culture. But make no mistake, the Americans are equally rapacious and corrupt, they just try harder to conceal it and trust that if their propaganda has worked then none of the other 200m Americans will have the intellect or the drive to expose them and throw them out.
Across the world, personal relationships trump principle and law every time. The yanks are always good at spotting the mote in other people's eyes, but not so good as espying the beam in their own.
Hypocritical? Yes. Pathological? Frequently. Will it change? Not for as long as Americans like to feel good about themselves more than they like to have an honest and truly world-leading nation. As opposed to the fiction they have right now.
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I stand aside. As a card carrying Yank, I'll happily stand aside and let you form a nation that is superior, better, and stands up for it's moral principles, pays it's debts, has a government without corruption, feeds the poor, and defends the weak, and never ever does ANYTHING that doesn't benefit other nations before itself. By all means. Please!
Then, perhaps we can watch how you fix these problems you find so easy to point out now. And like you, we'll be snide and laugh and point fingers, and tell each other how much better we are than you. Or if you succeed, we'll immigrate.
What are the goals of your nation? What does your nation stand for? Does the rest of the world care? Probably not. Funny that.
And if you're an American? Lead. Vote. Leave. Whatever.
S.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
As a psychologist I can tell you that many people feel that way when what they have held as beliefs for a long time are challenged.
My nation has similar psychological problems, but less advanced. But we aren;t talking about my country, we're talking about your country, and 'you do better nyeh nyeh' is hardly a mature response.
Wich I think goes some way to demonstrating my original point. That only by learning to see themselves as others see them will Americans emerge from the pathological wet dream they appear to have manufactured. And which they then seem determined to export and impose on everyone else. Now might think there is no poverty in America, no racial discrimination and profiling, no homelessness and nobody coming ut of school knowing how to read and write. These are all things you could address which are more important than attempting to pillage yet another largely Moslem country for its oil and gas.
Get off your horses, lose your spurs and shed the self-image that somehow you lead the world in anything but thievery and corruption, then more people may take you guys seriously.
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Indeed. I believe you. And that my friend is the problem. That's the reputation you have and yet you just don't see it.
I am reminded of 2 goldfish swimming around in a goldfish bowl. One turns to the other and says "You know, I really pity the little people who don't live in this wonderful place, don't you?"
"People are dumb. They truly are, as a group, violent, reactive, and just plain stupid. In smaller segments, however, people can be quite intelligent."
So having said my characterizations are wrong you go right ahead and say 'People are dumb". Right.
"That is the problem with your generalizations". Well, that's the nature of generalizations I suppose. Like statistics, they represent large samples (for which they are often accurate), but when applied to small samples they are less useful.
Have you ever wondered why and how generalizations become generalizations? You should do. It's either because they're right or it isn't. Which one do you think it is?
Annie.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I believe he was pointing out that your generalizations about Americans are false, not that your generalizations about America's reputation are false.
Have you ever wondered why and how generalizations become generalizations? You should do. It's either because they're right or it isn't. Which one do you think it is?
Did you just claim that all generalizations are true? Because it's the opposite - all generalizations are false, including this one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Nope, that's not what I said. Straw man alert…
"Because it's the opposite - all generalizations are false, including this one.""
Right.
On rainy days, it generally rains.
Just as wrong as wrong can be - right? Gotcha.
lol
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
As people, we are all defined by what we do, and rightly so. Our reputations are accumulated based on what we do and how what we do is interpreted. Therefore we tend to be what our reputations suggest we are. Hence, Nigerians are scammers, Germans are efficient, Italians design beautiful cars, Britons are a pain in the ass, and Americans are bullies.
Of course its a generalization. Generalisations are how we make sense of and survive in the world. If you don't generalize then you'd be quite happy to go down to Harlem with a Ku Klux Klan teeshirt. But of course, you wouldn't, because you generalize as to the how the people would respond to that.
See? Generalising is how we survive.
That'll be $10 for the education please, will that be cash or a cheque?
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
You're an idiot. So what country does that mean you come from?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
But let me guess. Everyone who makes you feel inadequate is an idiot - right? And I'm not alone am I my friend? You feel that way about a lot of people. Ah. If only they would see your real worth - right? As you think about it you can put faces to all the people who've made you feel bad about yourself. See them now, like ghosts who'll be with you all your life. So many ghosts.
Sort of proves my point about America really, badly needs to attand to its uneducated classes and forget about invading more defenceless countries.
Still, have a nice day. I imagine you could use a few.
Annie.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Your entire argument is a big straw man. You cannot see it through the fumes of your own shit you have convinced yourself does not stink.
How does it feel to be so smug and so wrong at the same time?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
My point? There is a block of nations whose politics have been corrupted. Every nation is a bully in their own right. History makes that apparent as well. Now it again apparent that the bullying of a single government has clearly been directed at the governed. Yah, that's never happened either.
Generally speaking freedom is being free, free to make your own decisions, free from being told what to do, free from manipulation and subservience and being cognizant of the freedoms of others. Governments can not abide by that and neither can a lot of individuals. Governments, by their nature, filter freedoms, and are diametrically opposed to freedom. It's a delicate balance, assuredly, but your clearly prejudiced generalizations belie present reality and the surging groundswell of activities that certain countries are claiming rights to.
What America is supposed to be is a country full of people that don't take kindly to being told what to do, down to a person. Americans are now being trained to both stay in line and to tow it. Five eyes and a hundred ears.
Americans, by their nature, are no better and no worse than any other standing citizen of any other nation.
American empire will eat itself. American principles, the founding principles, are distinctly applicable globally, to a person. I think that is "American".
Governments govern, tyrannies rule. Who lives where?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
If you think you can make me feel inadequate, you're having delusions of significance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Thanks for making the point clear.
If you are something and just have no conception of being that, then it speaks volume for one's perception.
To slag off other people because you find their qualified opinion unpalatable is the epitome of inadequacy.
We all do something well, even the most humble among us. Inadequacy is what you do well, or so it seems, and the fact that you do not perceive it is of absolutely no concern to me. I'm sure it has wrought havoc in your life already so I shan't need to labour the point, you do that pretty well yourself my friend.
But have a great day, I'm sure you could use a few of those.
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
The reality she is missing: America does not care about its uneducated classes. America is not about people. America is about resources.
There is no "America" at this point that is sustainable, and that does not involve invading defenceless countries.
She seems to think there is some panic button, some way to reverse course. Or that it can be done without bloodshed.
What she doesn't realize, is the people running things, DEFINE America as "World leader" (or bully) and it is their God-given (or Satan, if you prefer) RIGHT to occupy the universe.
While I do not wish to let "US-Americans" off the hook, it is worth pointing it:
-- what currently passes for "the US" has NOTHING to do with the United States, it is much further along than that. The idea of a sovereign nation, was long ago deserted.
You may say it is simply semantics, but what the United States needs is to actually BE the United States they were (supposedly) supposed to be. What we have now and today is a global entity, it is not American as defined by the U.S. Constitution, it is another beast entirely.
While I do think blame needs pointed in the proper direction, it is a lazy, careless mistake to call what is going on "American."
The "Americans" need to follow their own damn constitution, and not reach to populate and infect the world with their plans of domination. What is going on is much more of a corporate and religious nature, and has very little to do with anything "American."
That is not to say the battle has been lost, but worth pointing out: calling the current state of things "American" is just playing into their hands, and bystanders will think you buy their crap. What is going on today is far from "American" and is global imperialism hypocrisy and empire-building in the name of "peace." Has nothing to do with "America."
The battle may be lost, there may have never been a time when the U.S. Constitution was respected, but I would not give them even that inch of playing by their redefinitions and rewriting of history. Why help them by spreading their propaganda? The "America" no longer exists, if it ever did.
What we have today is another beast, why not call it what it is? Why water down things and sugarcoat them because it sounds better?
If Americans actually followed their own damn rules, they would not be around the world playing "hero." While convenient, it does not help causes to call what is going on now "American."
Every "American" should be embarrassed and ashamed what goes on in their name. They should not give the lowlife thugs in charge any respect at all, let alone refer to them as "Americans" when they are merely "empire builders" and only in things for the money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Nigerians are people, and just like in EVERY other country, some scam and some don't. But just like in every other country, the exported news is selective so you don't hear about all the great things people do in Nigeria, just about the scams.
Generalizing is how you become a bigot.
also, comparing rainy days to people is absolutely ridiculous. The only valid comparison to in generally rains on rainy days is that people generally breathe when they are alive. You see, you have to find something common among ALL of them, and breathing plus a heartbeat is about all there is that matches that criteria. Please, take your prejudice elsewhere, because we're trying to clean that up and having to shovel your shit as well isn't going to help us any.
Common Sense
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
"Generalizing is how you become a bigot."
Actually no, its how we all survive. If you don;t know how to generalize and draw action-supporting decisions then you die. If you are crossing a road and a bus comes, do you assume it will stop like a motor scooter and head across the road? No, you generalize and project, and you realize that the bus is less easy to stop than a motor scooter. So you live.
If you would like me to recommend a couple of good courses or books on nbehavioural psychology, then I would be happy to assist. That way you may realize where your own world-view came from. Might make you a smarter person maybe, it would certainly make you less wrong.
"Nigerians are people, and just like in EVERY other country, some scam and some don't. But just like in every other country, the exported news is selective so you don't hear about all the great things people do in Nigeria, just about the scams."
Correct, they generalise. I should write to the editor if I were you, perhaps they will pay attention to you.
"also, comparing rainy days to people is absolutely ridiculous."
I wasn't doing that, sorry it was too complicated. I was pointing out to some other guy that generalizations are not the work of the devil, but useful psychological strategies with a purpose. But I think the point went over his head. Yours too it seems.
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On rainy days, it always rains, that's not a generalization, that's a fact. If it wasn't raining, it wouldn't be a rainy day.
I don't think you have as solid a grasp on these concepts as you think you do, and I'll thank you to take your American-Style over-inflated ego and the arrogance that comes with it over to the saloon, with the cowboys you claim to hate but act just like. I do not need education offers from someone so willing to display their own lack of it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
The funny thing about generalizations is they can apply to anyone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
The point is we all do it, its a natural part of making sense of the world, and if we don't do it we die. Just because some folk can't come to grips with what really is a very simple concept, is no reason for them to become abusive, because we can all do that too.
So. Generalisations work. Generalisations are good, Generalising is necessary for survival. So the next time some numbskull accuses you of generalizing, as some numbskull accused me of doing, you can remember this conversation and understand that nature abhors a vacuum, and when it finds one, sends all sorts of vacuous nonsense to fill it up.
Have a great day, forgive me but I'm easily bored with twats (not you, you understand, perish the thought, but then you knew that already). I badly need to go find some real people to talk to. Preferably not Americans because they haven't quite come to terms with the fact that the whole world laughs at them. yet - its probably an EQ thang. I'm glad I'm not privileged to be an American. but then I'm glad I'm not European too or I'd probably have bad teeth, unlike the seppos who have good teeth but always seem to have way too many of them. The Donny Osmond rictus.
Cheers.
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
You noticed! I thought maybe that went right over your head. Now, the real question is: did you realize it was a joke?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Proof
We have no evidence that the NSA is grabbing the *content* of our communications deliberately, with human eyes destroying our privacy. Machine gathering of some meta data and even some whole texts (although not proven in a court of law) would still not mean a privacy erosion if it were not *looked at* and *used* to mount unlawful surveillance or arrest.
He was not arrested for this supposed refusal involving the NSA, but for insider trading.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Proof
"the people shall be secure in their persons against unreasonable searches and seizures and that no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause"
There is no grabbing that is supposed to going on, period, without a warrant and probable cause.
"We want to watch everyone, all the time" is not probable cause.
"It is our job" is not probable cause.
"Collect it all" is not probable cause.
You lose. Try again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Snowden's leaks will have far reaching ripples and this could be one of them. The politicians of this country that enabled the laws to be twisted this way may or may not want to straighten them out. Other governments will not be so appeasing. I also suspect the BRIC countries will make moves to change their methods of communications before it is all over with. No matter what happens here in this country, the ripples will continue for some years to come.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Purple Power suits
I can believe that he was prosecuted because of insider trading. The catch is, a bunch of other CEO's should have joined him.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Purple Power suits
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Purple Power suits
Crime does pay, if you are one of the elites. You are immune and will receive no jail time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Justice system is broken
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
corrupt government
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: corrupt government
So yes, you have a horribly corrupt government, but don't try to blame it on one person: the whole thing is rotten.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Man in the middle?
Ask the Qwest exec if they've giving themselves the right to fake communications, and since communications are used as evidence in prosecutions, have they given themselves the right to write evidence?
Do they man-in-the-middle?
I wonder because the Lavabit letter. Did they want to spoof Snowden or simply observe him?
The DEA fake evidence springs to mind. If they MITM, then we can't trust email as evidence because it could be NSA created fake email.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Man in the middle?
Mr. Schneier has some coverage of possibilities realized. https://www.schneier.com/
Here's a recent one that is relevant: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/09/new_nsa_leak_sh.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Man in the middle?
There is much more where that came from, but you should do your own research.
Why wouldn't they? Who is going to stop them? They do far worse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One adage worth remembering
Truth doesn't matter, nor does moral righteousness.
They're going to win the game, and the loser will be you doing time in Federal prison.
Evidence can and will be 'lost', witnesses can be bought off and the truth can be buried.
They play to win and they never lose.
I know this to be true. It's not fun.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"I can't wait for the first person to come up to me and say something to me" about the conviction, he said. "I'm going to look them in the eye and say, 'You must be confusing me with someone who gives a f— about your opinion.' "
As to his conviction, he was soooooo lucky that Justice was so poorly run and funded. He could have been caught for so much more like wire fraud and conspiracy for the KPNQwest bankruptcy, fraudulent SEC fillings, and securities fraud for the original USWest acquisition. In any event he should still have about 300MM in the bank and the house on Mansion Dr in Mendham NJ, the House in Jupiter Fl, and the shore house so its like nothing happened except he spent a few years guarded by goons which is just like he did at AT&T and Qwest....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well… tell me which bits I'm wrong about and what is the right version - that way you do something useful instead of just venting. That way I'll think your knees aren't just jerking because you read some comments you don't like but can't argue against.
But try and keep the comments polite and try to avoid vulgarity in word or imagery. That way I'll be able to take you seriously.
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
... wins both battles.
Because Football!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
An attitude of distance
Defending an weak argument against other answers using a weak argument does not make you a proper debater.
It makes you look petty and mean-spirited.
Sure, you can generalize all you want about America, and you can pin point all of our faults until the cows come home.
It does not mean all Americans are stupid, or that we're so weak-minded as to not know what the world thinks of our "cowboy" reputation. Some of us even are ashamed of being Americans, and apologize for it.
We don't all approve of our incredibly lazy, corrupt and inefficient government. We don't like it when we go to war with smaller countries for less than rational or even legal reasons.
But for all the 'evil' we do, it can be said fairly that the US is still the first place most immigrants choose to land.
That must mean something, right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: An attitude of distance
Correct, that's the nature of statistics. delete +/- 5% from each end of the normal distribution curve and you can draw conclusions about the majority. Oh, sorry, that's called generalizing isn't it?
"But for all the 'evil' we do, it can be said fairly that the US is still the first place most immigrants choose to land. "
Evidence? I think you'll find it depends on where they are. Europeans for example, head for Germany and UK.
"That must mean something, right?"
Yes, it means that the standard of living in America is still higher than in Swaziland, and probably that the opportunities to become self-made men by thieving from other people are better. Maybe I'm right, maybe I'm wrong, but its always interesting to see how quickly the illiterate resort to ad-hominem and sweeping generalizations of their own, while criticizing my better-founded generalizations.
It was ever thus, and this bigotry and "I'm right and you're wrong but I cant/won't support that contention because I don't have to because I'm an American" 's a part of the problem you guys face every day.
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: An attitude of distance
You act like there are not mass propaganda efforts directed at "immigrants."
You act like they have a choice. Where can you go to escape US influence? Russia? China?
What is their alternative? Be a US bitch over here, or be a US bitch over there. Not much of a choice, really.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If you are something and just have no conception of being that, then it speaks volume for one's perception.
To slag off other people because you find their qualified opinion unpalatable is the epitome of inadequacy.
We all do something well, even the most humble among us. Inadequacy is what you do well, or so it seems, and the fact that you do not perceive it is of absolutely no concern to me. I'm sure it has wrought havoc in your life already so I shan't need to labour the point, you do that pretty well yourself my friend.
But have a great day, I'm sure you could use a few of those.
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
None-the-less, at the end of the day, I have a pretty piece of paper saying I have a Masters degree in counselling psychology. You probably have a pretty piece of paper saying you can drive a car.
I thick I know which carries the more weight, but I'll let you work that out for yourself. It'll boost your self-esteem to be able to.
Over and out. Enough is as good as a feast and my point about generalizations has been made for anyone with an IQ higher than a potato.
Have a great day.
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I was having fun until I read that. That is just depressing that a counselor would act like this. Of course, you might be lying...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Maybe it's just me, but this Annie person's style and presentation seem very similar to those comments from Tara Carreon awhile ago.
Like my Momma always said: "Don't argue with crazy."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
When did your Mommy decide not to argue with crazy my friend? Do you remember?
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Paranoia?
Do you care to elaborate upon your mystical psychic diagnosis 'Oh Wise and Wonderful Keeper of Humankind's Entire Knowledge Base?
Why would I be paranoid (or even really give two shits about) some random crazy commenter on the internet? I was just making an observation.
When did your Mommy decide not to argue with crazy my friend? Do you remember?
My apologies. I am not very fluent in crazy-talk. What the fuck are you trying to say here?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Crazies
Other than to say its usually paranoids who see similarities in what people write on a screen, and try to divine personalities and identities from that.
"Why would I be paranoid (or even really give two shits about) some random crazy commenter on the internet? I was just making an observation."
Indeed, why would you bother at all?
Why would you bother writing what you just wrote?
Life's an eternal mystery is it not?
When did your Mommy decide not to argue with crazy my friend? Do you remember?
"My apologies. I am not very fluent in crazy-talk"
So naturally you try to get better at it by persisting. Excellent, keep working, you'll become fluent in no time. Just like Mom.
Excuse me now, I bored with this. I have paying patients to see. Pro-bono is over-rated.
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Crazies
I shudder to imagine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Crazies
Umm yeah. Sure you do. You said it on the internet, so it must be true.
BTW, I'm a French model. Bonjour.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Indeed. Seems like she can't shut up, either, which is cool. Definitely much more entertaining than ootb.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Just a piece of friendly advice but you're welcome to have the last word. I suspect you quite like to have the last word - sort of recover your feelings of street-cred, in your own eyes at least.
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Americans ARE educated. They are educated that imperialism and corporatizing the planet is a noble endeavor, since the world NEEDS our "capitalist" (snicker, snicker) ways.
They are educated that our constitution means nothing, is just an obsolete old piece of paper, and you will always lose, give up and get with the global agenda already.
You think the U.S. just sits by and lets schools teach anything they want? Freedom of speech? Nah, we just cut funding of anyone who says anything we don't like. Look at wikileaks as an example, there are countless others.
You are not wrong on your other posts, except on this. The general American is an idiot BECAUSE of education, BECAUSE of federal education, BECAUSE of what they have been taught.
You want educated Americans, but don't want a global superpower running everyone else's business? Tough luck.
That is what education IS nowadays, in the U.S.
Make up your mind. Please research American education and funding and you will see, the general American is in fact more educated than ever, from cradle to grave.
You should not open your mouth about things you know nothing about either, although I am happy to educate you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Don't blame others for your own laziness.
You think the U.S. is the only one on board as well? HA HA HA.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Generalising
"Generalisation: a general statement or concept obtained by inference from specific cases:"
Looks like that education I offered would have come in handy after all.
Sorry it went over your head, but then it is the domain of the uneducated to decry the benefits of education - because they don't have one you see, its a normal defence mechanism.
Over and out,
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Generalising
True, but that goes both ways. The self-proclaimed educated act like "education" is anything besides "job training" anymore.
How much did your education cost you? You think they taught you for free, out of the kindness of their hearts? HA HA HA.
You said it yourself -- you are in it for the money.
What "education" did you receive? You whored yourself out.
"Money makes the world go 'round" -- there, I saved you $100,000 of student loans.
Which doesn't make you wrong. Just a shameless, blind, self-serving hypocrite. Nothing wrong with that, as you say -- you are educated, that's what matters!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
generalising
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: generalising
Sadly, no. You fail.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
shuddering
But then the pictures you conjure up in your mind aren't really my problem. Many of my patients come to see me precisely to change them. Not you of course, I doubt you could afford me, but lots of people have the same problem - you know, th pictures that just arrive and you don't know where they arrive from. But I do, and that's why people come to see me. Not you of course, I doubt you could afford me.
Gibe my love to your Mom.
And my condolences.
Annie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]