CIA Also Scolded By Court For 'Twisting The Factual Record' And Withholding Documents
from the guess-they-were-getting-lonely dept
So much of the attention about our abusive intelligence agencies has focused on the NSA. Even the FBI has been seeing some sunlight as its abusive practices have been revealed. But, amazingly, the CIA has been rather unscathed by all of this, even if the revelations of the intelligence black budget showed that the CIA was actually getting more money than the NSA (something most people thought was not true). However, in a story that has received not much attention, McClatchy reporters recently wrote about the CIA getting smacked around by Judge Beryl Howell in a DC district court (yes, that Beryl Howell).Howell was not impressed by the CIA's attempt to keep certain documents under wraps:
In a recent decision, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell denounced several of the CIA’s legal arguments. At one point, she accused the CIA of a “shameless twisting of the factual record.” Other assertions by the agency, she called “dead wrong” and “implausible.”The specific quote on the shameless twisting of the factual record concerned the CIA's attempt to portray a non-profit that had requested documents under a FOIA request as a for profit organization, because it sought funds on its website. This is similar to our recent report of the FBI arguing that FOIA service Muckrock wanted documents for commercial reasons. Basically, it looks like they'll look for any excuse. Of course, given the smackdown Judge Howell gave the CIA over this, the FBI may want to reconsider its letter to Muckrock:
The CIA appears to conclude that NSC is a for-profit entity based on the fact that “its website appears to solicit paying customers.”.... The mere earning of income, however, is not at all an indication that an entity is organized for profit. Even nonprofit organizations must pay their bills. The government, of all entities, should know that the difference between a for-profit corporation and a non-profit organization is not whether the entity earns income (or even whether it earns income at a profit). Rather, “[i]n contrast to a for profit corporation, a non-profit organization must utilize its earnings to finance the continued provision of the goods or services it furnishes, and may not distribute any surplus to the owners.” .... The CIA’s shameless twisting of the factual record in this case to portray their assignment of rights position in a better light falls short of the level of representation that this Court expects of a United States government agency. The CIA should know better than to make such an obviously unfounded argument, particularly in light of the many allegations of bad faith that have been leveled by the plaintiff in these cases, including allegations that prompted a nonfrivolous motion for sanctions.Yes, we recognize that the intelligence community's default mode is to keep things secret. But that doesn't mean it gets to misrepresent and lie when confronted with a basic FOIA request. You expect a culture of deception to rise up in agencies whose main purpose is to deceive, but that's exactly why we need more transparency and strict oversight of their activities -- and that's something that we've fallen well short of achieving.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: beryl howell, cia, foia
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
ALSO unscathed are these mega-corporations:
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/secret-prism-success-even-bigger-data-seizure
There's PLENTY of CRIMES here, Mike. The country has PLENTY enough jails now filled with harmless dopers that can be emptied for co-conspirator executives and gov't officials, so don't be shy in calling for indictments and jail time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ALSO unscathed are these mega-corporations:
No call for jail time is in the article.
Nobody thinks those companies aren't guilty of sharing data with prism, but their acts are perpetuated by the government who is okay with that sharing of information. I'd read the article but I'm not surprised if you A) misinterpreted or misquoted it, or B) you're simply confusing a statement to mean more than it actually does, as with most of your conspiracy theories.
Fix the government for its violations of the law and then you'll find people more willing to punish companies for violating the law as well. All there is to it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Another sequel to SPIES GONE WILD
But it's clear they're not going to stop. We have to take matters into our own hands. Makes ourselves "small" on the Internet. Start using encryption-equipped browsers and stop putting things on Dropbox, iCloud, etc. Stash everything in a Cloudlocker (www.cloudlocker.it) which works just the same but keeps your data at home where they still need a warrant to get it. They'll soon be a bunch of new tools like this coming out to protect us from the people supposed to protect us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On the upside, we've now learned exactly how far she is willing to let the copyright cartels go before she has a problem with them.
Rest well campers, once someone leaks the cartels spying paperwork and they try to avoid owning up to it... she'll call them on that. until then its game on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]