Over 120 Rights And Religious Groups Join ACLU In Call For DOJ To Investigate NYPD's Surveillance Of Muslims
from the pushing-back dept
Over the last few years, the NYPD's intrusive surveillance of the city's Muslim population has raised many concerns about civil liberty violations while simultaneously failing to turn up much in the way of terrorist plots.
The ACLU has gathered the support of 125 civil rights, religious, racial justice and other community organizations, all of which have signed its letter requesting that the DOJ investigate the NYPD's surveillance of Muslims.
Dear Acting Assistant Attorney General Samuels and Section Chief Smith:As we've seen previously, the NYPD has placed blanket surveillance on entire mosques, justifying it with guidelines weakened by a former CIA officer who exploited post-9/11 paranoia to broadly expand the department's surveillance powers and eliminate built-in protection of civil liberties. This surveillance continues to this day despite an NYPD official admitting these programs have yet to generate a single useful lead or investigation.
The undersigned civil rights, faith, community, and advocacy groups request that the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice commence a prompt investigation under 42 U.S.C. § 14141 into the New York City Police Department’s (“NYPD”) discriminatory surveillance of American Muslim communities.
As shown by the NYPD’s own documents, for over a decade, the Department has engaged in unlawful religious profiling and suspicionless surveillance of Muslims in New York City (and beyond). This surveillance is based on the false and unconstitutional premise, reflected in the NYPD’s published “radicalization” theory, that Muslim religious belief, practices, and community engagement are grounds for law enforcement scrutiny. That is a premise rooted in ignorance and bias: it is wrong and unfairly stigmatizes Muslims, who are a law-abiding, diverse, and integral part of our nation and New York City. Unsurprisingly, the NYPD’s surveillance program has had far-reaching, deeply negative effects on Muslims’ constitutional rights by chilling speech and religious practice and harming religious goals and missions. It has frayed the social fabric of Muslim communities by breeding anxiety, distrust, and fear. The NYPD’s biased policing practices hurt not only Muslims, but all communities who rightfully expect that law enforcement will serve and protect America’s diverse population equally, without discrimination.
Under the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 § 210401, the United States Attorney General is authorized to conduct investigations concerning “a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers . . . that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.” 42 U.S.C. § 14141(a)...
The ACLU has drawn support across a variety of religious groups, many of which recognize that while the NYPD may be focused on Muslims now, any other religious (or political, activist, etc.) group could be subject to the same intrusive surveillance if a future attack brings with it guilt by association.
If the DOJ follows through, this will be the second time in recent months that it has weighed in on the NYPD's questionable tactics. Back in June, Attorney General Eric Holder filed a brief recommending that if Judge Scheindlin found the department's stop-and-frisk program to be unconstitutional, independent oversight should be appointed to keep the department in line. Sheindlin did find elements of the program unconstitutional and one of the remedies was, indeed, independent oversight.
As was pointed out then, the DOJ's reputation may be terrible, but one of the few areas in which it has been "aggressive and commendable" is its handling of civil rights violations by police departments. Hopefully, this will result in more of the same.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: doj, investigation, muslims, nyc, nypd
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
We cannot pick and choose to whom freedoms apply. They either apply to everyone or to no one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
History http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunpowder_Plot
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
The 2nd amendment only applies to militias, as in State Militias. An individual is not a militia, not even if they own a gun. The 2nd amendment was put there to stop a strong central government from taking all the weapons away from the states, in case that central government became so corrupt the ex-colonists had to overthrow it just like they did Britain.
Back then there really wasn't any controversy over Americans having guns, many needed guns to go hunting to feed themselves and their families, much like most of us today need cars to get to work or anywhere today.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
This "NY problem" is systemic, tip of the iceberg - and is not isolated to NY, it goes way beyond anyone's religion and has everything to do with undermining the rights of everyone. Wagging fingers adds nothing to the discussion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Remember the Inquisition? The Crusades? Are you Catholic you extremist murderer?
Got the problem? I'd say the founding fathers never thought there would be people like you so willing to throw freedom under the bus or they'd have provided some Amendment to hang those types of people. (tw-way-logic)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Gee, we sure seem to have a lot of extremists in the US of A. Is that why the NSA is keeping us under surveillance?
The key words here is a few. Certainly not all right-wingers are extremists but in much of the world a good portion of them are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: look at the numbers
Since 9-11, there have been over 21,000 Muslim terror attacks.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: look at the numbers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
exploited post-9/11 paranoia
funny term you chose there. Perhaps you should understand terms before using them, makes you look like a hack.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: exploited post-9/11 paranoia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: exploited post-9/11 paranoia
So you see, you cant be paranoid about something that happened !!!
You can be paranoid and they "they are all out to get me" when in fact, THEY ARE ALL OUT TO GET YOU.
It not an irrational thought that people are going to try to kill you by flying planes into buildings !!! IT FUCKING HAPPEND !!!
Or were you away that day ?
It's not even a 'phobia' as its certainly not an 'irrational' fear, again, it really happened, yes there are groups out there, who have stated they are engaged in a holy, religion based war against America who on that basis have made real physical attacks and killed real people, and they said they will and want to do more of it.
The claim this as a war of the Muslim faith against America, its not the religion, its the people using (and abusing) that religion to their own goals.
So yes, under those circumstances it makes perfect sense to look at the people involved in that religion to enable them to find those using that religion to kill other people.
The police are not looking 'at the religion' they are looking at the people using that religion to justify their war.
and yes, I do remember seeing thousands and thousands of people cheering in the streets after the 9/11 attacks. Do you think any of them if they had heard about the attacks would have info about it, would they have told someone about it, or kept it to themselves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: exploited post-9/11 paranoia
No, you can't. IF they are out to get you, THEN you are not paranoid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: exploited post-9/11 paranoia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: exploited post-9/11 paranoia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: exploited post-9/11 paranoia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: exploited post-9/11 paranoia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: exploited post-9/11 paranoia
But in this case, they are not all out to get you. So you're simply paranoid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: exploited post-9/11 paranoia
2 : a tendency on the part of an individual or group toward excessive or irrational suspiciousness and distrustfulness of others
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
See how easy it is to build up a hate argument, as shallow and false as it may be.
The one thing government does better than taxes, is after taking the rights away from a minority, they take away those rights from all of us. No one should be subject to this level of surveillance simply because of the religion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
But the IRA does not or did not do acts of terror in the name of Christ, nor did the Oklahoma bomber, IRA wants Irish independence, and who know about the Oklahoma Bomber, but neither of them are a large faction or sub-group that has declared (publicly) their HOLY WAR, based on their religious beliefs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
paranoia is a powerful thing when you have it, but you just have to keep telling yourself 'its not real', and that "the man' is not going to "get you" because you used a phone to order a pizza, and there is no man with a note pad writing down what you ordered to use that information to arrest and imprison you.
But you might think like that if you suffer paranoia! just say'in.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:Seriously???
Try to explain this one away. The KKK
Largest domestic terrorist group ever and in the name of Christ.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
As a Catholic from Northern Ireland I know all about this. I know how Catholics were treated in the 60s and 70s. This is why I feel sympathy towards the millions of innocent Muslims across the world.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Extremist Muslim Holy War
They were not saying the rosemary's when they were flying a flock of planes into American icons.
So if the 9/11 attacks were 'claimed' to be from Buddhists, who formally declared "WAR" on America, it would make sense to keep a weather eye on that group.
clearly they are all not extremists or out to blow up Americans, but the ones that are not, would they 'report' those they think might be, or just keep it to themselves ?
You might consider calling the police if you overheard the person next door building a bomb and talking about blowing up Americans, but does that apply in to all Muslims, or do they 'keep quite' and see what happens.
It is after all a religious faith that has declared a HOLY WAR against America, it would make sense to watch that particular religion and not others that have not declared a holy war against you.
And it has nothing to do with the religion itself, it has to do with the motives of some to use that religion for their own gains.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Extremist Muslim Holy War
This is where you lose the point, an entire religious faith has not declared holy war, it is only a minute percentage of people that follow the religion that share those views.
Do you think it is accurate to say that Christianity has declared a holy war on gay marriage just because some members feel that strongly abou it?
"And it has nothing to do with the religion itself, it has to do with the motives of some to use that religion for their own gains."
I think you just did a 180 there, so which is it the religion or the individuls???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Extremist Muslim Holy War
I would say they do not follow Islam at all. I would say they have perverted Islam into something else to justify their actions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Extremist Muslim Holy War
Again, it is not an attack on the Muslim faith, its an attack on those using that faith and abusing that faith for their own goals.
So you have to look within that faith to find the people in that faith who are abusing it, no point in looking in a catholic church for extremist Muslims, just as you would not look in a Mosque for extremists Catholics.
If a group of extremists Catholics planned and attacked America you would look at Catholic churches to try to identify that extremist sub-group.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Extremist Muslim Holy War
if the Christians flew jet planes into the gay and lesbian parade I would! That's the difference.
And advocated martyrdom and a promise of exultation in heaven I would.
It is a faction of the religion, its not the religion it the people in the name of that religion, again its not against the religion, but about those abusing that religion for their own motives.
Think "branch davidian sect" for example.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Extremist Muslim Holy War
That's 'rosaries.' If you're going to try to make religious analogies, at least have the decency to not mutilate their sacraments.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Over 120 Rights And Religious Groups Join ACLU In Call For DOJ To Investigate NYPD's Surveillance Of Muslims"
and discusses a call for an investigation of surveillance in NY that is admittedly based solely upon profiling.
The comments have, predictably, wandered off on a tangent assuming all sorts of things which have little to do with the topic at hand. Some even attempt to justify the surveillance without knowing any details, because - who needs details when hate is involved.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Islam poses special problems, but ALL religion is dangerous.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BOLLOCKS
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: BOLLOCKS
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: BOLLOCKS
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Plumbers Paramus NJ
http://www.aladdinplumbing.com/plumbers-paramus-nj/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]