2009: Man Buys 5000 Bitcoins For $27, Forgets About Them. 2013: Man Rediscovers His Bitcoins, Now Worth $886,000
from the valuable-information dept
Bitcoin shares with drones the unhappy distinction of being the subject of almost exclusively negative reports. Just as drones are usually doing bad things to people, so Bitcoins are usually helping people do bad things because of their supposed untraceability. So it makes a pleasant change to come across an upbeat Bitcoin story like this, as told by the Guardian:
Kristoffer Koch invested 150 kroner ($26.60) in 5,000 bitcoins in 2009, after discovering them during the course of writing a thesis on encryption. He promptly forgot about them until widespread media coverage of the anonymous, decentralised, peer-to-peer digital currency in April 2013 jogged his memory.
In those four years, his Bitcoin holding had become worth around $886,000 -- a rather nice gain on the original outlay. But the real moral here is not, as it might appear, that you should rush out and buy Bitcoins in the hope that they will be worth fabulous sums in a few years' time -- the continuing fluctuations in Bitcoin's value and doubts about its underpinnings make that a very risky proposition. Rather, the key thing to note is the following:
Bitcoins are stored in encrypted wallets secured with a private key, something Koch had forgotten.
Fortunately for him, Koch did manage to remember his password. But just imagine how he would have felt if he hadn't been able to recall his private key, and had meanwhile discovered that he had $886,000 worth of Bitcoins that he couldn't access. So the real moral here is this: make sure you back up all your passwords -- even the ones you think you'll never need again -- just in case.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: bitcoin, encryption, fluctuations, norway, value
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Hopefully I purchased some bitcoin in 2009 too...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The whole time I wanted to invest in gold. In 1999 gold was worth about $278 an ounce (averaged over the year). It made no large moves up or down. We were given two weeks to figure out where to invest and checked the numbers once a day in the newspaper. Every company I looked at fluctuated wildly compared to gold. But alas, I couldn't invest my virtual $20,000 in it.
But then I saw reebok. It was nearly the cheapest stock in the whole NYSE. And it only went up or stayed the same! I invested everything in Reebok. By the end of the 12 weeks, I was richer than anyone else. Everyone bought Microsoft or Boeing, since that's where their parents worked, or wanted to work (I live in the Seattle area). During that 12 weeks, Microsoft fell (I can't remember why) and Boeing had a machinist Union strike. Needless to say Reebok only grew by about 1/20th of a percent, but that was a lot better than MS or Boeing.
Ever since, I've wanted to buy gold anyway, and if I could have invested back then, I'd have a ton more money in gold than any of my idiot peers back then.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
He invested his virtual money 50/50 in Adobe and Macromedia because he liked both companies, while most of the people kept on buying and selling things each week. The teacher was really mad at him for in his view 'doing nothing' in the virtual stock exchange, especially when he got the best return on investment in the entire class when Adobe and Macromedia announced they were merging.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: LDoBe
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You can transfer Bitcoins in or out of your account whenever you want and can buy or sell to or from your bank account in 3-4 days (which is the bank's fault).
Also, Bitstamp is taking international wires from US banks, but many US banks are starting to block those.
Still, it's easy to buy Bitcoins if you want to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bitcoins are too expensive to be worth using as money
According to my math, his bitcoins sold at $177.20 USD each. How often when you buy something do you spend over 177 dollars?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bitcoins are too expensive to be worth using as money
/tard
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bitcoins are too expensive to be worth using as money
Thanks for keeping the tradition alive!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bitcoins are too expensive to be worth using as money
"How can I ever bought something with a $100 bill?"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Bitcoins are too expensive to be worth using as money
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bitcoins are too expensive to be worth using as money
Bad example though cause no one buys anything Apple.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bitcoins are too expensive to be worth using as money
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Bitcoins are too expensive to be worth using as money
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What is it worth today! 12.7.17
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Where to buy BTC
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
this article
[ link to this | view in chronology ]