Companies Developing Crowd Analysis Programs To Detect 'Abnormalities' In Behavior And Match Faces Against Giant Databases
from the watching-over-you dept
One of the reasons that the total surveillance programs of the NSA and GCHQ are possible is that computers continue to become more powerful and cheaper, allowing ever-more complex analyses to be conducted, including those that were simply not feasible before. Here's another example of the kind of large-scale monitoring that is now possible, as reported by Nikkei Asian Review:
NEC announced that it has developed the world's first crowd behavior analysis technology. Based on the simulated behavioral patterns exhibited by people in emergencies, the system is designed to detect any abnormalities in the behavior of congested public places.
This is very similar to an EU-funded project called "INDECT":
The primary objective is to develop advanced and innovative algorithms for human decision support in combating terrorism and other criminal activities, such as human trafficking, child pornography, detection of dangerous situations (e.g. robberies) and the use of dangerous objects (e.g. knives or guns) in public spaces. Efficient tools for dealing with such situations are crucial to ensuring the safety of citizens.
Like INDECT, the key justification for the NEC surveillance system is to "prevent crimes and terrorist attacks". Another Japanese company is also exploiting the immense power of computer systems to offer blanket surveillance:
Hitachi Kokusai Electric began marketing a new surveillance system that can search and identify a target individual by using an enormous volume of recorded footage from surveillance cameras. The company extracts facial features of individuals -- including profile shape, eye size and the shape of a nose bridge -- and stores them in a database. The system can then compare the features of the person in question against this data. It can complete the search within one second using a database of 36 million faces.
In other words, the claim is that this system could scale up to store facial features of the entire world. And it's not just the Japanese who will be making money from spying on you:
This search technology could be used to quickly identify terrorists in public places. The company said the system could register faces of up to 7 billion people if 50 servers are linked up.EMC of the U.S., a leading information-technology storage hardware provider, has developed a surveillance system that uses external storage technology. The system can hold data of up to 20 petabytes by linking up as many as 144 storage devices. This is enough to store 13 years of continuous footage from 100 cameras.
What's truly frightening about all these systems is that this is just the beginning. As computers become faster, and storage cheaper, it's easy to imagine the output from every surveillance device on the planet being stored forever, and constantly re-analyzed to find those awkward "abnormalities", AKA individuals...
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: behavior, crowd analysis, gchq, nsa, surveillance
Companies: nec
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Facecrime
"It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could give you away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a habit of muttering to yourself -- anything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality, of having something to hide. In any case, to wear an improper expression on your face (to look incredulous when a victory was announced, for example) was itself a punishable offence. There was even a word for it in Newspeak: facecrime, it was called." -- 1984Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
OK, I'll give you that cameras, or people, watching could spot things like robberies, mugging, weapons. By watching behaviour it's possible to spot unusual activity such as people about to commit suicide, or presumably someone being kidnapped or trafficked.
However "child pornography ... in public spaces". Really? Is there much child pornography going on in public spaces? I doubt there's that much going on in the public internet (probably mostly on private networks), so I really doubt there's much going on in railway stations, plazas, etc around the world.
Yet another "but think of the children!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is this the same thinking that leads police to say a suspect didn't respond how we expected upon getting tragic news?
Being an outlier will now be reason for even more... wait what am I saying. We are all being spied on pretty much constantly now, how are we to notice if someone is getting extra scrutiny?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Or maybe we could prevent such situations from happening by having Governments that are truly democratic and don't act in their own interests, provide people with what they need and don't try to deeply interfere with other nations?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Someone a remote location being notified by an algorithm at will do less for child safety than a visible police officer. They may be able to say, 'oh look.that child is being kidnapped', but they will not be able to prevent it. By the time they get hold of a dispatcher, who then notifies a police officer, it may well be too late.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Great - now how do *I* get access?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
what is really odd
This has only been around for the past 20 years or so, and TD has only just caught up?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: what is really odd
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: what is really odd
'Stop looking behind the curtain! I said stop looking there!'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Facecrime
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Facecrime
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Facecrime
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Facecrime
You know, I'd ask if the politicians pushing this crap on the public had ever read that book, but I've got the strangest suspicion that they've not only read it, but they liked the world presented in it so much they've been intentionally trying to bring it to life.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Facecrime
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Facecrime
Creepy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Facecrime
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Facecrime
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Do costumes have air conditioner?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And what do they do with this new found capability?
Find a cure for cancer?
Find ways to end pollution?
......
Nah! - let's use it to spy on everyone. Yeah, that's the best use evaaaaar.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Someday people will look back upon the days before all this intrusive technology, government snooping and the perpetual wars on *insert enemy* with fondness and yearning.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Forced conformity is upon us. We're getting to the stage where all hopes of living unmolested rest on being as average in appearance and behavior as possible. Is this what we want?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Well...
Well, the clothing is invisible so he's half way there ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"designed to detect any abnormalities in the behavior"
I think that trying to surveil the entire world in this way is also an abnormality of behaviour - and I've detected it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Criminal
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Criminal Features
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Detect any abnormalities...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Detect any abnormalities...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]