Appeals Court Upholds Life Prison Sentence For Iraqi 'Terrorist' Caught In One Of The FBI's Own Terrorist Plots
from the make-up-your-own-plots dept
Over the past few years, we've reported over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again, that the FBI's "anti-terrorism" strategy appears to be setting up its own fake terrorist plots, convincing gullible young men to "join", and then arresting them for participating in a terrorist plot where there was no chance of any actual terrorism happening, because all of the weapons were fake and all of the other participants were with the FBI. Defenders of these programs argue that they're "flushing out" potential terrorists, but many of us worry about where this crosses the line into entrapment and a sort of "pre-crime" rather than stopping any actual crime. In many cases, the deeper you look at the details, the more you realize how much the FBI really led the charge, and even coaxed participants into taking part.Either way, in one such case, Iraqi refugee Mohanad Shareef Hammadi, was arrested and sentenced to life in prison -- and that sentence was just upheld by the 6th circuit appeals court, though much of it on the basis of procedural issues. It appears that Hammadi, without a plea deal in place, agreed to plead guilty, thereby foreclosing many of his entrapment arguments. Given how much pressure the DOJ likely put on him to plead guilty (this is where the DOJ really puts the squeeze on people), Hammadi may have felt he had no choice. Now, Hammadi may be a very bad person. He may even have done terroristic things in Iraq and perhaps eagerly wanted to do more in the US. If some of the government's claims about him are true, you could see where it would make sense to have some surveillance over him. But it seems to be stepping over the line to then set up an entirely fake plot, involving shipping fake weapons to fake terrorists -- and then choosing a combination of "weapons" that allowed the feds to give him the highest possible sentence: life in prison, which is what he got.
The appeals court doesn't really see a big deal in all of this, suggesting that his history, his eagerness to take part in this fake scheme, and a variety of other side points make all of this okay. I have a lot of trouble with that, because it's easy to portray someone taking part in such an effort as "eager" when that might not actually be the case. The ability for the DOJ to misrepresent Hammadi's involvement is very high here, but the court seems to accept basically all of it. Other courts have found the same way, so this isn't surprising or outside of precedent. It just seems troubling that the DOJ can go around setting up fake plots, encouraging people to take part in them, often pushing them further and further, and then use all of that as evidence of anyone being involved in a real plot.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: entrapment, fbi, mohanad shareef hammadi, own plot, terrorists
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
First...
"First they came for the Communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Communist.
Then they came for the Socialists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me."
Remember when real criminals did real crimes and got caught and punished for it? Now, made up criminals do made up crimes with made up weapons and made up terrorists...
I don't know about you, but I feel no safer knowing my own government is the one edging on terrorists.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: First...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: First...
Jokes aside, fake terrorist do not scare me, but people that's twisted enough to make them scare the living shit out of me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: First...
Terrorists have never been a real threat to the population in any country that they weren't in charge of, it's just their methods of apparently random, highly visible killings makes them seem far more dangerous than they really are(which is exactly the point behind such methods).
Put plainly, terrorism only works when the target lets it, a test of courage a sad number of countries(or the governments in those countries at least) seem to be failing these days.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Doesn't bother me a bit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Doesn't bother me a bit
Your viewpoint bothers me because it goes against the U.S. Constitution when it comes to Due Process. It goes against the Geneva Conventions when it comes to processing POWs. It goes against the International Human Rights Campaign when it comes to treating suspects in criminal activities.
And more importantly, it goes against the basic, simple human morality of giving someone the benefit of the doubt before you decide to end their life.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Doesn't bother me a bit
there, fixed that for ya', sparky...
*sigh* another propaganda victim who denies the humanity of all non-amerikans...
ps libtards got brass in pocket, too, psycho-killer...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
art guerrilla at windstream dot net
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Doesn't bother me a bit
However, I remember being 10 years old and thinking my ideology was right and everyone else was a 'tard too, so I understand where you're coming from.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Doesn't bother me a bit
Reality is, most people, when plied with sufficient pressure and means can be brought round to an extreme position. This could have been anyone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Doesn't bother me a bit
If 1.57 billion people were in an overt war against us, it would have been a nuclear World War III years ago.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Doesn't bother me a bit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Doesn't bother me a bit
You have that backwards.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Doesn't bother me a bit
And where do we get the idea that all Muslims are bad? There are around 1 billion Muslims in the world yet we judge all of them based on the actions of a few terrorists. That would be like saying all Catholics are evil because of the Spanish Inquisition or that all Christians are evil because of the Crusades.
What would happen if this issue happened in Iran or Iraq? People in the US would lose their minds about how the "evil government" had ensnared an innocent American. Yet over here, many people are fine with the idea, as long as it catches an evil Muslim.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good...arrest them all!
And TechDirt has a problem with people wanting to maim and murder people. Great.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good...arrest them all!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good...arrest them all!
It's a complete waste of time and resources. Without the cops convincing people to blow stuff up, those people would never have done so. Removing them from society doesn't increase security at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
People who think this is okay...
They are the same people who think it's okay for police to throw a bag of weed or a gun into the backseat of a car, because the driver looked like a hippie.
Depressing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Officer 2 - Yes he is he's never had a speeding ticket Officer 1 - lets change that
Officer 2 - ok ..how? Officer 1 ..We change the signs and make his 30 mph 40 then you change it back after I pull him over
Officer 2 -- you sir are brilliant ..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The real horror is lawyers and their deliberate tricks.
2nd problem here is rabid idiots who believe Muslims are any sort of threat. Sheesh. First, that says your faith in own religion is weak, second that you're a loony in practical terms: Muslims just don't have the arms to overcome the US; third says you're a gullible fool, fell for an obvious FAKED ATTACK that brought in military dictatorship.
Lawyers invented legal fictions called corporations precisely so that crimes can be committed without personal responsibility, only money fines.
03:24:46[d-577-1]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pre-Crime is not an Actual-Crime
This feels very "Minority Report" to me. Except this is real life, not the movies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And, course, he plead guilty. Everyone has the right to an appeal, unless waived, but without a trial, there's almost no avenue for appeal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
What do these groups have in common? They are a convenient boogyman to trot out scare the public into giving them ever more power.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Yes. Also, though it may just be a movie reference, but I believe that the spooks even have a name for these types of setups: fundraisers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://www.damninteresting.com/bad-rye-and-the-salem-witches/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]