Judge And Intelligence Task Force Both Seem Stunned By Lack Of Evidence That Bulk Phone Collection Program Stops Terrorists
from the complete-failure dept
For months now, NSA defenders have argued repeatedly that the bulk metadata programs were necessary to stop terrorist attacks. For a while they were throwing around the claim of "54 thwarted terrorist events" which some (falsely) pretended meant 54 thwarted attacks. However, the numbers have been debunked repeatedly by people looking into them. Multiple Senators have debunked the idea that the bulk metadata collection was useful. Senator Patrick Leahy said that his own review of a classified list of what the program was necessary for did not show that it was used to thwart terrorist attacks. Separately, Senators Ron Wyden, Mark Udall and Martin Heinrich went so far as to file an amicus brief stating that they've yet to see any evidence that the program has been useful.So it's been pretty obvious to many of us that the claims of the necessity of this particular program have always been on shaky grounds -- but those calling bull on the program were widely seen as being already against those programs, and the NSA hadn't had it's "day in court" -- so to speak -- to defend the usefulness of the programs. That's partly why the two big moves against the NSA program from the past few days are so interesting. In both the district court ruling against the NSA and in the White House's own independent task force's proposals for reform, the US government had clear opportunities to defend the programs -- and in both cases, it appears that the court and the panel were shocked to find that the NSA basically had absolutely nothing to show to suggest the programs were actually useful.
In the ruling by Judge Richard Leon, there's a very telling footnote, number 65, where he notes the following:
The Government could have requested permission to present additional, potentially classified evidence in camera, but it chose not to do so. Although the Government has publicly asserted that the NSA's surveillance programs have prevented fifth-four terrorist attacks, no proof of that has been put before me.The judge then points to multiple sources (including those that we mentioned earlier) debunking the claims.
But the response from the review panel -- which, again, included a recent former CIA director and anti-terorrism Czar in the White House -- was even more telling. It appears they fully expected some details on how these programs had been used to stop terrorists, but the fact that the NSA couldn't show any such evidence seemed to leave them flabbergasted. Here's panel member Geoffrey Stone explaining to NBC the shock the panel felt:
“It was, ‘Huh, hello? What are we doing here?’” said Geoffrey Stone, a University of Chicago law professor, in an interview with NBC News. “The results were very thin.”Given all this, are NSA defenders like Rep. Mike Rogers, who has flung around the totally bogus 54 number, even directly in an appeal to block the defunding of the program, still going to lie to the American public in claiming this program is necessary? A court and an investigative panel, both of whom found that the claim is completely unsubstantiated.
While Stone said the mass collection of telephone call records was a “logical program” from the NSA’s perspective, one question the White House panel was seeking to answer was whether it had actually stopped “any [terror attacks] that might have been really big.”
“We found none,” said Stone.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: evidence, nsa, richard leon, section 215, surveillance, task force
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
It's what he's paid to do after all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I offer a better service for the NSA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I offer a better service for the NSA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You forgot the magic word for things like this
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I offer a better service for the NSA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Side Effects
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Side Effects
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ben Franklin got it right
p = 100 x (54 x 3,000 / 300,000,000)
p = 100 x (54 / 100,000)
p = 54 / 1,000
p = .054%
So, NSA would have "saved" .054% of the citizenry at the price of deeply violating the civil rights of 100% of them. Imagine how much less sympathy I have for NSA's actions since the demonstrated value is 0 instead of 54.
My numbers are easily AS stupidly meaningless as anything the government has offered but not MORE.
If we don't start hanging these guys, We, The People, will well-and-truly deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More of the same for More
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Logical Fallacy
I submit the most likely way a plot would be discovered is not by monitoring electronic communications Other activities such as purchasing usually large amounts of fertilizer or other chemicals not typically purchased in the quantities needed or at all by the average person for any innocent purpose are more likely to the tip-off. Often these weird purchases are reported by suspicious store clerks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
how many "threats" were invented by the fbi themselves?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: how many "threats" were invented by the fbi themselves?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: how many "threats" were invented by the fbi themselves?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-12-23/data-are-money-for-google-to-yahoo-asking-nsa-to-back-of f.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
_________________________________________________________
Gotta have lines to add credibility to my bullshit
_________________________________________________________
The more lines, the better....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
In this case the text is way too short and straight into a character assasination by association. I mean, this AC seems to be part of a longer smear campaign to demotivate the authors on this page given the regularity of such nastyness.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The real number
After all, the Universe runs on it, doesn't it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rather the whole point of all this spying on Americans isn't because of terrorists but because they don't trust the public. The reason you would not trust the public is if you are doing things you know well they won't like and will react unfavorably to when they find out. It's their early warning system basically.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]