Shia Labeouf Brilliantly Parodies Intellectual Property With Plagiarized Apologies And Defense Of Plagiarism
from the do-keep-this-up dept
I'll admit that, other than knowing his name and that he was a Hollywood actor in some big budget films, I didn't know very much at all about Shia LaBeouf. However, apparently he's been facing some "controversy" over a few different examples of plagiarism in his work, with the "biggest" being plagiarizing a cartoon by Daniel Clowes called Justin M. Damiano with the short film HowardCantour.com. Others also pointed out that, in a comic book created by LaBeouf, he apparently plagiarized a bunch of others, including Kurt Vonnegut and Charles Bukowski (if you're going to plagiarize, plagiarize from the best, apparently).While plagiarism scandals pop up every so often, there are a variety of standard responses -- usually involving some sort of apology and then someone laying low for a while before reappearing (just ask Joe Biden). LaBeouf initially appeared to be following the same script... tweeting out apologies, before people started realizing that the apologies themselves were "plagiarized." That includes using Tiger Woods' apology after his scandal: "I have let my family down, and I regret those transgressions with all of my heart." Also, former Defense Secretary Robert McNamara's famous apology concerning his role in the Vietnam War: "I was wrong, terribly wrong. I owe it to future generations to explain why."
From there, he finally admitted on New Year's eve that he was really mocking everyone -- which should have been obvious from the beginning, by saying:
You have my apologies for offending you for thinking I was being serious instead of accurately realizing I was mocking you.Oh, and if you hadn't figured it out already, that line is also plagiarized.
He then decided to give an email interview with BleedingCool, much of which itself appears to be plagiarized as well. BleedingCool initially claimed that it believed the statements were "original" to LaBeouf, but then has gone back and noted repeated lines in the interview that are plagiarized from others. I'm guessing that they're missing quite a few others.
But what comes out of it is what is likely a highly plagiarized defense of plagiarism, as well as a condemnation of the state of copyright law today, and how it limits forms of expression. Take this tidbit, for example:
The problem begins with the legal fact that authorship is inextricablyAt least some of that is from Larry Lessig. Almost certain other parts are from others. But, in a way he's proving the point. He is creating something new, unique and interesting, even as he's plagiarizing others, even to the point of talking about outdated copyright laws.
bound up in the idea of ownership and the idea of language as
Intellectual property. Language and ideas flow freely between people
Despite the law. It’s not plagiarism in the digital age – it’s repurposing.
Copyright law has to give up on its obsession with “the copy”
The law should not regulate “copy’s” or “reproductions” on there own.
It should instead regulate uses – like public distributions of copyrighted work -
That connect directly to the economic incentive copyright law was intended to foster.
The author was the person who had been authorized by the state to print there work.
They were the ones to be held accountable for the ideas.
THE FIRST LAWS ON AUTHORSHIP WERE USED TO CENSOR & PERSECUTE
THE WRITERS WHO DARED PUBLISH RADICAL IDEAS.
Simple – should creation have to check with a lawyer?
For what it's worth, even this idea is not unique. Back in 2007 we wrote about author Jonathan Lethem writing an entire defense of plagiarism, which was 100% plagiarized. If Labeouf is looking for more material, he might want to check that one out, if he hasn't already. Oh, and also Malcolm Gladwell's 2004 defense of plagiarism, which has some great quotes as well.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, creativity, intellectual property, plagiarism, shia labeouf
Reader Comments
The First Word
“The truly brilliant part....
As any good artist can tell you, there are rules you must first learn and master, but once you have mastered them you can purposely break them effectively. The rule here is quotation with attribution. He is seamlessly littering everything he says about this with quotes but purposely leaving out the attribution as a means to get people to pay closer attention to what he is actually saying under the guise of finding the hidden quotes. It's like a graphic designer breaking kerning rules for typesetting - purposely making something harder to read - in order to engage the viewer's attention a little longer to in order to figure out the meaning. As with any art, there will be those that will get it and those that will not and those that think they do but haven't got a clue.Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
One word...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Plagiarize!
Why do you think the good lord made your eyes?
So don't shade your eyes,
Plagiarize!
(Only remember please to always call it "research").
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Plagiarize!
Every chapter I stole from somewhere else.
Index I copy from old Vladivostok telephone directory.
This book was sensational!
Pravda - well, Pravda - Pravda said: "Zhil-bil korol kogda-to, pree nyom blokha zhila"[1] It stinks.
But Izvestia! Izvestia said: "Ya idoo kuda sam czar idyot peshkom!"[2]
It stinks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Plagiarize!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Plagiarize!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Plagiarize!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Plagiarize!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Plagiarize!
A sad case if I ever saw one. There's no hope for you, I'm afraid. ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Plagiarize!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Certainly not a well directed film.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I saw the result of Indy using that fridge in Fallout: New Vegas, and believe me, it's not nuclear-proof! Try "Wild Wasteland" to see for yourself.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
'There' / 'Their'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 'There' / 'Their'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The truly brilliant part....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The truly brilliant part....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The truly brilliant part....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The truly brilliant part....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
*starts slow clap*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sad thing is, thats how some people think, that being strict is whats important, then the actual severity of the "crime", in this case, quite literally letters being put together to put words together, the mentality being that if you use this non crime to do something someone else doesnt like, then this NON CRIME will be viewed, or at least an attempt to make OTHERS view this LITERAL non crime as a.....well,.....crime.............bastards overdue for major karma, is what that is
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sounds familiar.
One has to wonder if this has ever been attempted in real life...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sounds familiar.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He may be trying to make a larger point about re-mixing, but we here all usually still agree that trying to profit off of someone else's work that you haven't transformed is still a douchy thing to do.
The kid can't even seem to form a proper English sentence. I don't think he's trying to parody anything, I think he's trying to make excuses for things he's actually done wrong.
He's thumbing his nose at everyone who thinks he should apologize, but that doesn't mean he actually shouldn't apologize.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
If so, I can take Stephen King's "Cujo", retitle it "Bingo" and film it exactly as written (just changing the characters' names as Shia did with Clowes' story) and suffer no legal consequences, right, boy?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
A very long movie runs 2.5 hours or so. It's literally impossible to include a complete novel on the screen in that amount of time. Movies tell short stories, not novels.
This means that movie adaptations of books must be adaptations: they have to be converted from novel form to short story form. That is significant editing, requiring significant creative decisions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
You obviously didn't see the two-part "Atlas Shrugged".
And the point was that he took the story without permission or acquiring the rights.
If he did it with a Stephen King novel (even changing the names), his bank account would belong to King.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
True. The book was bad enough, I certainly won't watch the movie.
I was redirecting the back to the point back to what ChurchHatesTucker was saying: that adapting a story to the screen is inherently transformative. What the AC was proposing was nonsensical and not to the point.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Actually, it was the point.
Had Shia taken a story by anybody better-known, he'd be up the creek without a lawyer for using the material without authorization or licensing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
He shouldn't have to apologize, and we do not all agree that what he did was wrong on any level. Any line you can draw on what is acceptable can be argued as subjective. Thinking that you can tell sewage from water after the two have been mixed is self-deluding. (Yes, that was a pun.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I see what you did there...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I must not be smart enough
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I must not be smart enough
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I must not be smart enough
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I dunno. That interview is pretty impressive...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Actual Cannibal Shia LaBeouf
There's no one around and your phone is dead
Out of the corner of your eye you spot him:
Shia LaBeouf.
He's following you, about 30 feet back
He gets down on all fours and breaks into a sprint
He's gaining on you
Shia LaBeouf
You're looking for you car but you're all turned around
He's almost upon you now
and you can see there's blood on his face
My God, there's blood everywhere!
Running for you life (from Shia LaBeouf)
He's brandishing a knife (It's Shia LaBeouf)
Lurking in the shadows
Hollywood superstar Shia LaBeouf
Living in the woods (Shia LaBeouf)
Killing for sport (Shia LaBeouf)
Eating all the bodies
Actual cannibal Shia LaBeouf
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ...
http://www.shortoftheweek.com/2013/12/16/howardcantour-com/
From the comments...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ...
http://www.wired.com/underwire/2014/01/shia-laboeuf-plagiarism/?cid=co16820364
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's not the story. He seemed to legitimately try to apologise at first, and gave an apology that was a combination of his own words and an old Yahoo Answers post. In all likelihood he copied/pasted from Yahoo Answers because he didn't have the intelligence to word his own defense and the fact that he altered a few words seemed to suggest he was trying to disguise this and put it 'his own words' (as they often direct you to do in grade school English classes). AFTER this was discovered he then started posting glaringly famous apologies as his own words. It's more than reasonable to say this was an attempt to save his ass, try to suggest it was all a joke rather than him being embarrassingly empty-headed. It should tell you everything that all his 'quotes' since the Yahoo Answers discovery have been from famous people rather than random message board posts.
I can understand having different views on quoting and plagiarism but to describe anything Shia's done here as 'brilliant' is just pure gullibility speaking.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
“Seemingly indifferent to the fate that awaited him – Donal Thomas continued to look obstinate in the antechamber of the execution room. A silent exchange pitted the condemned man.”
While Duteurtre wrote:
“Seemingly indifferent to the fate that awaited him, Désiré Johnson continued to look obstinate. In the antechamber of the execution room a silent exchange pitted the condemned man…”
If you think this is somehow brilliant or that he was should be celebrated because his apologies for doing this were quotes from other people without using quotation marks we obviously don't agree on brilliance. I perhaps might give him more credit if he were answering interviews like this his whole career as opposed to after being shown as a plagiarist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
"There is more to him than meets the eye."
If I left the quotation marks off you would assume I came up with this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Except you didn't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
"There is more to him than meets the eye."
This was taken from another comments section, on another web site, pertaining to the story, written by someone else. The function of the quotation marks is to signify this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
He has shown no mastery. The mission statement for his website was lifted verbatim from another comic book author. I find a pattern of laziness, you find it brilliant artist. He has given no credit to anyone besides himself until confronted.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Occam's razor says it's PR spin
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Occam's razor says it's PR spin
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"I never asked to be paid
And never profited off anyone’s back"
This just in, Hollywood: Shia Labeouf will work for free!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One more note...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: One more note...
The same way Stephen King would be harmed if Shia took one of his stories, filmed it without paying for the rights, and claimed it as Shia's own work, which is exactly what the a-hole did!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: One more note...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: One more note...
Or is that what makes it the kind of publicity you just can't pay for?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: One more note...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: One more note...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Andy Kaufman Inducted into the 2014 WWE Hall of Fame
[ link to this | view in chronology ]