Fearmonger Extraordinaire Rep. Peter King Accuses Sen. Rand Paul Of 'Fearmongering,' Says He Doesn't Deserve To Be A Senator
from the crazy-is-as-crazy-does dept
Today's daily dose of insanity from Rep. Peter King continues where he's left off before. Having already called Senator Rand Paul "a disgrace" for suggesting that Director of National Intelligence James Clapper ought to be prosecuted for lying to Congress, King decided to double down against Paul on Monday saying both that Paul doesn't deserve to be a Senator and accusing Paul of "fearmongering."On being a Senator, King flat out said:
He doesn’t deserve to be in the United States Senate for spreading that type of misperception and absolute lies, to be honest with you.”We'll remember that line, because we'll bring it up again in a bit.
In the meantime, sometimes I wonder if King has absolutely no self-awareness at all. Because immediately after he accuses Paul of fearmongering -- saying of Paul, "he's playing on some sort of... fearmongering" -- King immediately insists that if we did what Paul wanted (reining in the NSA), that it would allow terrorists to kill thousands of people. I'm not kidding. I'm sorry, but arguing for greater protections of privacy isn't fearmongering. Claiming that violating all our privacy to stop thousands of people from getting killed? That is fearmongering.
[Rand Paul is] trying to create this paranoia among Americans that the NSA is spying on everyone, the fact is he has not been able to cite one abuse by the NSA.Except, of course, there have been plenty of abuses. Even the NSA admits it. King is either lying or completely uninformed. Oh, and it's not like he hasn't lied in the past. Remember, he was the Rep. who flat out lied about Glenn Greenwald to say that he should be prosecuted for threatening to reveal names of CIA agents (something Greenwald has never done).
So, uh, if fearmongering and lying mean you don't deserve to be in Congress, shouldn't fearmongering, lying Peter King step down? And, we didn't even need to bring up the fact that King used to support terrorists himself -- the white Irish kind, which he's apparently supportive of, rather than the brown Muslim kind that he dislikes. Oops.
King is apparently preparing to run for President in 2016 on what must be the "fuck the Constitution" platform. In just the past few months, he's openly mocked both the 1st and 4th Amendments. Beyond fearmongering and lying to the public, I'd argue that both of those are pretty good reasons why someone doesn't deserve to be in Congress, let alone be elected President.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: nsa, peter king, rand paul, surveillance
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Too bad he's not a real animal...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who am I to say that.. Seems the whole world is heading in the same direction. Dark ages ahead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Im sure he can make all the right sounds for the Tea Party and then after the election promptly do exactly what hes told.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's not a sentence, right?
"Claiming that violating all our privacy to stop thousands of people from getting killed?"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: That's not a sentence, right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's Tuesday, and...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The more I see/hear of this guy
Really-every time I hear of him saying this or that, all I can envision is a rabid pit-bull foaming at the mouth.
Rather absurd picture, but that's what you get when you put Irish whiskey into your body before 8 am every day-and I think he's one of those nasty mean drunks, too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The more I see/hear of this guy
Peter King has climbed the tree of 100 % faith in the NSA being perfect and any mechanisms to hold their power back being the downfall of civilization. He has already ramped far past anything with a shed of evidence or reason to justify it. Now he is just doubling down to try to avoid "humiliation". McCarthyism and that way of arguing is a comfortable way to go about these things since it keeps people focused on your target instead of your own absurd justifications for attacking it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
All bets are off
Schumer, King, etc. have established reputations of being less than truthful. There's no expection that will change unless the press stops sanitizing their "reporting."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
or maybe he's just a total fucking retard, mixed with with a good dose of complete fucking idiot!
(no disrespect to anyone who may be accused in other circumstances of being a retard!)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Constitution
1st Amendment - HIPPIES NEED TO SHUT IT AND STOP HATING AMERICA
2nd Amendment - Assign everyone a gun (And subsidies the manufacturing costs with tax breaks for S&M, and require all 'Muricans to pay full price)
3rd Amendment - IF YOU HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE, IT AIN'T NO PROBLEM (Also, The NSA is already in your family room, bedroom, bathroom, and every other room you use electronics SO THIS IS MOOT)
4th Amendment - IF YOU HAVE NOTING TO HIDE, DON'T WORRY 'BOUT IT...AND ONLY GUILTY PEOPLE RESIST!
5th Amendment - IF YOU HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE, WHAT'S THE PROBLEM? (Unless you are an executive or elected official, in that case this is still fine)
6th Amendment - TRIALS GO MUCH FASTER IF THEY ARE PRIVATE (secret) AND ONLY ONE SIDE GETS TO TALK. YOU CAN'T HAVE YOUR CAKE AND EAT IT TOO! also, Lawyers are dumb (Unless they grow up to become elected or appointed officials, so they can stick to defending DUIs and stuff)
7th Amendment - There's a 7th Amendment? SINCE WHEN? THANKS ALOT OBAMACARE. $20 adjusted for inflation from 1776 to today is like $50948873 dollars. YOU ONLY GET A JURY IF YOU ARE WORTH $50948873 DOLLARS. Plus, Terrorists don't get juries!
8th Amendment - EXCESSIVE BAIL IS BAD. THEREFORE, NO MORE BAIL FOR THOSE WHO ARE "TERRORISTS" ("Terrorist" hereinafter refers to someone arrested for "terrorist activities" as defined by ME BITHCES)
9th Amendment - WHY DO MANY AMENDMENTS? JUST STOP AFTER #2! THESE ARE YOUR ONLY RIGHTS. That way, they can't conflict with others you think you have. YAY SIMPLICITY.
10th Amendment - STATES RULEZ, CONSTITUTION DRUELZ. (Also, My state > your state, SO LISTEN UP.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He sounds like he's a few bottles short of a six pack. What really disturbs me, is he is a congress critter responsible for passing laws.
Until the news media starts calling out and making uncomfortable these bald faced public liars and the public gets the idea they can throw these idiots out of office, nothing is going to get better.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thousands of deaths?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Thousands of deaths?
Although maybe it'll be a week or two after the fear of being watched starts getting to people...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How's that for a terror attack?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Then there is that little thing
�I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.� (thanks Wikipedia).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Then there is that little thing
Protect the Constitution.
Have secret interpretations that drastically alter the way the Constitution is applied.
CONSTITUTION IS FINE, BUT IT DOES NOT MEAN WHAT YOU THINK IT MEANS.
Also, It's in a nice sealed box/frame thingy to protect it from the elements / terrorists / Nicholas Cage, so his job is basically done, right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I was thinking the very same thing about you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A bit of advice
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If guys like this are representative of their constituents then America surely is doomed
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That dickwad supported the same IRA that blew my school up. For real
That dickwad supported the same IRA that planted car-bombs which scared the shit out of me when I was a kid. When I tried to get away there was another bomb round the corner, then hoax bombs everywhere else.
Seriously Peter King is a fucking scum bag.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Consistently
Under-performing
Neocon
Tool
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I admit, I had to look it up, it sounded too much like a politically made up word.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wikipedia: Peter T. King (New York's 2nd congressional district)
Wikipedia has a great dox on Mr. Pete, he is a cartoon character, if you ever need an image for in power hillbilly stupid, biggoted he is it, no doubt about it, look at all his statements over the years and a pattern emerges of someone that should never be granted a seat in government ever.
N. Yorkers you wanna know why you keep getting less safe and why the police is so rude, ask Mr. Pete that question he is after all one of the enablers of such things.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]