Cop Shoots Teen Holding Wii Controller In His Own Home
from the lack-of-control dept
We've seen some fairly extreme examples of police involved in shootings that were, shall we kindly say, questionable. Whether it's charging the target of police firearms with assault over injuries incurred by bystanders, officers being given the opportunity to see the evidence in question of shootings before making their statements, or officers simply looking to destroy said evidence, there appears to be an epidemic of trigger finger in our nations protectors, even as the danger involved in their jobs dips to historic lows. It's difficult to know just what is responsible for these stories. Are we simply able to hold LEOs to task due to more ubiquitous video surveillance? Is there an officer education problem? Is a police force more militarized than ever naturally going to exhibit more aggressive behavior?
Whatever the cause, we had damned well better figure it out, because the stories keep rolling in. The latest is the tragic tale of a Georgia teenager who wanted to serve his country and instead ended up getting served with a fatal wound for the apparent crime of having a video game controller in his hand.
The family of a 17-year-old shot and killed by a Euharlee police officer has hired an attorney, and they say he had a remote control in his hand. They say it was not a gun.The officer who shot him reportedly exited the home shortly after shooting Roupe, sobbing into her hands, a clear sign of remorse. Hell, it sounds weak, but mistakes happen, even tragic mistakes like this. Remorse is the proper response. The response offered in the officer's report of the incident, however, is not.
Christopher Roupe, 17, was in the ROTC at Woodland High School and wanted to join the Marines. His friends said he looked after them.
A female police officer told GBI investigators that Roupe pointed a gun at her when he opened the door.Open the door with a controller in your hand and get a bullet in the chest. Then, to have the report deviate so completely from the eyewitness accounts just adds salt to the family's wounds. At some point people are going to have to realize that, despite what your favorite news program would have you believe, violent crime continues to diminish, while shootings by police have remained static. That simply doesn't make any sense.
“We don't know where that statement came from. The eyewitnesses on the scene clearly state that he had a Wii controller in his hand. He heard a knock at the door. He asked who it was, there was no response so he opened the door and upon opening the door he was immediately shot in the chest,” [attorney Cole] Law said.
That a young man who wanted to serve was caught by another officer with a trigger finger should sound the alarm that it's damned time something was done.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Here's what I want to know:
A Wii controller doesn't look even remotely like a gun, and even a cursory glance will allow anyone to tell the difference, so to shoot him over that, she either already had the gun drawn when she knocked(an action that would raise even more questions), or took a glance, assumed it was a gun, drew, and fired without actually looking at the 'weapon'.
Also problematic, the officer was apparently there to serve a 'probation violation warrant' to the kid's father, and yet didn't identify herself, or even respond at all, when her knock on the door got a 'Who is it?'
If the father was really such a huge threat that the officer was that quick to pull and fire, why was there only one sent? Either the father has a nasty reputation, yet somehow they figured one officer would be enough, or she was insanely quick to go lethal.
Finally, while it's nice that she apparently was remorseful over her actions immediately afterwards, the fact that she then turned around and lied about it on the report to try and cover her ass pretty effectively wipes away any sympathy I might have had. Mistakes happen, I get that, but when the 'mistake' gets someone killed, the absolute least the person who screwed up can do is own up to it and admit their responsibility, not try and shift the blame to the victim.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Here's what I want to know:
The police will usually justify this type of shooting as "Officer Safety" concerns. Where is the concern for "Citizen Safety?"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bloody British
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Missing something?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's not complicated
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Missing something?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's not complicated
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's not complicated
So for example they'd do X number of years out in the 'field', say 5, and then they get reassigned to a desk job for the same number of years, then back out, and so on. This would allow them time to 'cool off', and help reduce the mindset where they'd start to see everyone else as a potential threat simply because it was safer that way, by replacing it with a nice, safe, yet boring job for a few years.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's not complicated
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Here's what I want to know:
Police are scared, they don't like taking risks with their lives or risks in violating the law or someone's inalienable right to be a total jerkoff and get angry with the police at every turn. What use to be two cops showing up at a door more often now is a whole team, because they don't know what is on the other side of the door and don't want to end up dead or in serious shit.
I also have to say that the story stinks of one sided treatment. First off, the kid wasn't sitting in his home randomly gunned down, he answered the door and apparently had the remote in hand in a manner that it could be seen, as least a bit. Second, while I don't count it against them, you might want to also consider that this shooting took place in a trailer park, and it wasn't a random situation - the father was getting served a warrant.
You don't have any of the background of the story here at all: What about the area, what about the father, what about the warrant... was the officer expecting a violent felon who was being busted for probation violations? Is the father a past violent felon? Is there a reason why the cops were at the door with weapons drawn? Did they perhaps knock repeatedly and announce themselves, but the kid didn't hear them because the video game was too loud? Did he only answer after they had just about busted the door down?
You see, you don't know - and so there is the potential that there is very much more to the story than what is being presented by the family's attorney, who will most certainly paint the kid as a little angel and absolute leave out everything about his father. It's pretty amazing because through all the reporting, there isn't any mention of his father's name - so there is no easy way for us to figure out the other pieces of the puzzle.
My guess is that he didn't think it was a cop, opened the door like he thought it was one of his friends and did something to startle the officer who already had her gun drawn against the risk of the convicted felon answering the door, and gave her only a very short period of time to take the fatal action.
That doesn't make for a very good "bad cops!" story, but it reads much more believable.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That is the most compelling article I've read regarding these continuing incidents. My hat is off to you, sir.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Remember, this a lawyer
I don't doubt that the kid's shooting was a mistake / accident and a huge problem, but it seems obvious to me there mare more details here then "kid opens door holding wii remote and gets shot by police officer." The officer is probably still in the wrong, but I'd like to hear the rest of the details before climbing on my soap box.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This Doesn't Happen In Countries Where Guns Are Not So Prevalent
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's not complicated
Cops should not have guns. Batons and tazers maybe. That's it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's not complicated
All military around the world get through this fear (which doesn't mean its not present just controlled) by training, training, and more TRAINING.
If by then there is still a fear problem, then the individual has a disposition that shows they should NOT be doing that kind of work nor be placed in that situations (this would result in a breach of Duty of Care by their superiors)
Also the BUDDY SYSTEM is used by military, LEO's, community health and welfare officers, even Tax officials the world over. So for her to be on her own and state she was fearful of the 'unknown' means she is also at fault for not insisting on another officer at the time of attendance.
Also a bit of due diligence on 'unknown' situations goes a long long way to protect all sides. who'd a think it hey!
Mistakes are ONLY understandable if there was no reasonable way in which they were not foreseeable in each situation. This is a foreseeable and based on your response known fearful instance and therefore this mistake should NEVER be made since it should be trained out of them.
To state otherwise or to call it a 'mistake' is only adding more apathy to the innate problem.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: It's not complicated
[ link to this | view in thread ]
However, it seems that the FBI, despite tracking, assembling, and publishing a massive number of crime and police related statistics of every sort imaginable, for some strange reason does not compile 'death-by-police' statistics -- or at least doesn't release them publicly.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"crime and violence in the country is on a decline while crime and violence inflicted on Americans by police officer is on the rise"
I take exception to police violence being static. If anything, it's on the rise and rapidly growing out of control. I'm loathe to say this but if police officers keep randomly shooting Americans, because they have a quota on how many lawsuits they can get filed against their own police departments, then there's something seriously screwed up.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: It's not complicated
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Remember, this a lawyer
A several of the local PDs (using the term very loosely) are known to be trigger happy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And as far as the "male cops are worse" comments...
"in the United States, women today make up only 13 percent of the force"
http://cops.usdoj.gov/html/dispatch/07-2013/women_in_law_enforcement.asp
Yea you guys failed to realize the obvious...way more male cops. Not to mention the males are more gung-ho and hold higher rank so they call the shots more often.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
NSA's new target?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Most cop beats have buddy teams. I guess these trying economic times means cops get their training on the job instead of police academy. However something is wrong with this story and it's facts leading up to the event. It's just not all there to make any sort of call on opinion.
This write up appears to have an author that is very sensitive to the fact that increasingly it's the citizens that are getting killed and wounded and we are in no sort of civil war to set this type of back ground behavior.
Yet the cops and our government appear to be setting up for just this type of civil war scenario. That DHS needs enough ammo to fight the Afghanistan war for 20 years and calls it cheaper in bulk doesn't float as a reason. Nor does it float for the IRS department for buying huge amounts of ammo and last but not least, why is the US Postal Service buying sniper ammo? I mean it is not like the USPS has a daily job of setting out snipers to deliver the mail. All of this along with all the spying is setting up an us against them mentality that appears to be playing out in the streets and homes of this nation before there is any warfare.
When did we become Russia or China?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
where is money spent
in a land where there are more handguns than people, you have to wonder what sort of workplace pressure that policewoman was under to show how tough she was to confront some individual at home, at night, over some minor issue, alone.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Well, the information is "probation violation". That means she likely was supposed to bring him in, and he might be a troublemaker.
So she might want to surprise him, and might not want to identify herself in order to keep him from opening the door. And make sure he does not close the door on her again.
That's perfectly consistent with a drawn weapon and being on edge. It's not consistent with safety off.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's not complicated
I think you're wrong however. I don't think they all live in fear of their lives, it seems more likely they're poorly selected and poorly trained.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Here's what I want to know:
They can legally shoot cops if they feel extremely threatened by the police.
Of course, the police are arguing that it's not fair and it starts "open season on police officers".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Remember: cops are cowards
With that in mind, none of these stories are surprising. Cowards panic. Cowards over-react. Cowards "protect" themselves even when there's no real threat.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Remember, this a lawyer
[ link to this | view in thread ]
She shot him in his own home, for Christ sake!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Little girls with guns
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It used to be that cops had to be DAMN SURE that someone had gun before taking out theirs and starting shooting. Now at the slightest hand move they shoot fatally. Clearly it's a problem of training and the culture formed in police departments over the past years.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: NSA's new target?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
a little more info
Seems there were two officerst present. Strange there is still no comment from the investigation (GBI) a week after the incident.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's not complicated
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jacquelynsmith/2013/08/22/americas-10-deadliest-jobs-2/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
They need the ammo to enforce Obamacare. If you don't buy insurance to stay healthy they will shoot you. See the logic there?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Looks to me like genuine malpractice claim against the doctor as well. One such bankruptcy, and you will see existing standards being enforced.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: It's not complicated
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Video Games
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I always use the opportunities to shittalk about the cops because they are idiots, and that max-iq barrier they have on recruitment is just sad, but in this case the cop was either very incompetent or she had a reason to believe that the kid would kill her.
Anyway just sayin the media always forgets to mention little details, so dont be too quick to judge.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: It's not complicated
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Remember, this a lawyer
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's not complicated
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: It's not complicated
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Stats?
violent crime continues to diminish, while shootings by police have remained static
I'm able to find violent crime stats easily enough but I'm having trouble finding police shooting stats over a similar period of time.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Back to the drawing board
WARNING - Opening Your Front Door
Give yourself plenty of room. You will probably be shot by Police while answering the front door while using the Wii Remote, so be careful that all areas that you might move into are clear of other family members. Make sure that furniture, objects and people are out of the kill zone so you don’t accidentally bump into them while falling to your death. Also, as indicated in the Wii Operations Manual, it is recommended to stay at least three (3) feet from Police holding firearms. To avoid sudden death, make sure you remove the Wii controller safety strap from your wrist and place the controller down before answering the front door.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Stats?
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20131230/15411225716/number-officers-killed-line-duty-drops -to-50-year-low-while-number-citizens-killed-cops-remains-unchanged.shtml
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
From now on all video game controllers will have to be manufactured in blaze orange.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The hell it is the proper response. The proper response is to immediately call for a medical team and provide assistance not run out crying in saying your sorry.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Here's what I want to know:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: This Doesn't Happen In Countries Where Guns Are Not So Prevalent
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: This Doesn't Happen In Countries Where Guns Are Not So Prevalent
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's not complicated
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: This Doesn't Happen In Countries Where Guns Are Not So Prevalent
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_death_rate
Once you get through the South American and African countries there is the US - easily the top "first world" country by gun death rate.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
What is that?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
What is that?
I have no idea...but I'm pretty sure I want the latest release - with lots of gee-bees and some of those why-fi thingys too.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A NERD gun? What is that?
ARM CPUs, lasers, and Wi-Fi make firing this weapon an experience like no other.
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/03/bullseye-from-1000-yards-shooting-the-17000-linux-power ed-rifle/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Since there is no federal repository for this information there is no definitive data, but from the data people like policemisconduct.net collect, it appears this exactly the case.
And there probably never will be with the power the police unions and lobbys wield.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A NERD gun? What is that?
Too funny. I posted my comment in jest at about the same moment you did and lo and behold such a thing does exist - with plenty of GBs and WiFi even.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A NERD gun? What is that?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Here's what I want to know:
Also, gotta love the hypocrisy of the "open season on police officers" idea. As opposed to the 'open season on citizens, pets, and anything else within range' they currently enjoy?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: It's not complicated
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: It's not complicated
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: It's not complicated
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's not complicated
Something is clearly out of whack -- probably either misdirected training, or paranoid law enforcement culture, or likely both.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Here's what I want to know:
horse with no name just hates it when due process is enforced.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If he was black...
Instead, the innocent victim happened to be white, so nothing can be gained politically from the shit-stirrers and the media couldn't care less.
At what point will something be done about police militarization? I heard one the other day refer to other cops as "the troops".
Will people take notice when a kindergarten is raided with flashbangs and tear-gas? ("I caught a whiff of a foul smell down wind... my dog gave the appropriate sign I ordered it to... we thought it was a meth-lab and that the GI Joe dolls were heavily armed militia members")
The fact is, when your own colleagues are the ones who investigate the fatal abuses of power, then you can be certain they'll cover your back. You'll even get to retire early on a comfy disability pension - you know, because of all the stress you endured after killing an unarmed innocent person.
When will those with their hands on the purse strings finally say "enough is enough"?
If Ruby Ridge or Waco is anything to go by then they never will reign in "the troops".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: It's not complicated
That being said, this website is not the United States, it's privately owned and the concept of free speech does not apply here. The only comments allowed are those the techdirt staff deem appropriate. Should they choose to remove them then they have that right.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
We all know dangerous those new fangled "lazer light" guns can be, so I'm sure the response was totally called for.
NOT.... /sarcasm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Here's what I want to know:
Yeah, it's the public! They're all criminals! It's the good guys (the cops) against the bad guys (the public). Why can't people understand this? Well, it's because most of them are the bad guys (the public)!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Remember, this a lawyer
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
What is the pathological condition you're suffering where you can't accept/admit that police do terrible things?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: If he was black...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Here's what I want to know:
By the way, Policeman being shot are down by a good percentage while citizen deaths are rising!
I've always had respect for law enforcement, however, lately I've started to question my respect. There are just too many innocent people being hurt or killed by police officers that are sworn to "Protect and Serve".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
let's see it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
http://www.northwestgeorgianews.com/rome/news/local/da-looking-for-more-evidence-in-death- of-euharlee-teen/article_8c360dbc-caeb-11e3-9645-001a4bcf6878.html
[ link to this | view in thread ]