Dish Protects Its Hopper DVR From The Dennis Hopper Estate
from the hey,-man dept
Dish has already had a long and winding road getting its "Hopper" DVR first to market, then keeping it there. The company has been engaged in ongoing disputes with broadcasters, who continue to try and argue that the device violates copyright law because it skips commercials -- and generally provides consumers with interesting, convenient functionality that users might actually want. Fox had no luck killing consumer choice and innovation at the 9th Circuit, and ABC is currently in New York attempting to reverse a New York federal judge's refusal to issue an injunction.While Dish is busy defending Hopper against broadcasters, it's also busy battling the obvious confusion people often have between digital video recorders and the deceased Easy Rider and Apocalypse Now actor Dennis Hopper. Responding to a broad trademark application by the Hopper estate (aka the Trustees of the Hopper Art Trust), Dish has filed an opposition to protect its ad-skipping DVR. The Hopper Estate registered the "Hopper" trademark in 2012 with an eye on "sunglasses, motorcycle helmets and all sorts of electronic devices." Dish itself filed for a trademark back in 2011 -- before Hopper's death:
"According to Dish's notice of objection, the Dennis Hopper "Hopper" mark "is likely, when used in connection with the goods covered by the subject application, to cause confusion, to cause mistake or to deceive, with consequent injury to [Dish Networks] and the public." Dish says it filed an "intent to use application" back in September of 2011 -- before Dennis Hopper's trustees, before TV broadcasters realized what Charlie Ergen's company was up to -- on "Hopper" in a class of goods covering electrical and scientific apparatus."Surely after the dispute is settled by the USPTO, there's a middle ground here for both sides to jointly sell motorcycle helmets and a clothing line that somehow combines the edgy, quirky, rambling style of the deceased Blue Velvet actor, with the convenience of being able to "stick it to the man, man" by skipping advertisements.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Something like that would sell like crazy I'm sure, though it might also drive up accident rates, as people got distracted by the 'new' billboards.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hopper was also in...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hopper was also in...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hopper was also in...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hopper was also in...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Confusion
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Confusion
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Unless Dish shows that they actually intend to sell motorcycle gear, they should get in trouble for lying in a court filing. "On information and belief" is not a substitute for telling the truth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Kids these days, need everything explained to them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Uh something is wrong here...
According to wikipedia he died in 2010.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Hopper
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Uh something is wrong here...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Uh something is wrong here...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Uh something is wrong here...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
and GRACE Hopper??? Cobol?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I Thought You Can’t Trademark Your Own Name?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chck your facts...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Chck your facts...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
dish is anticonsumer
'hopper' is a piece of crap....i'd long derided them for not doing a 'whole house' dvr unit, but this thing is not any answer I would have done.....and as far as the automatic ad-skipping, it doesn't add up lawfully....it's beyond the bounds of the Betamax decision which allowed for home recording....dish's previous dvr's required the user to specify each show or series of shows to be recorded, and they were then recorded in real time....what they're doing with 'hopper' is to THEMSELVES record only CERTAIN content (broadcast nets in prime time) and then REBROADCAST it hours later for download to the hoppers, with their own inserted 'cues' as to when to skip forward and how far....yes, they sit there during those meantime, manually flagging the ads....completely illegal under the copyright act, and I don't see how the courts did not seem to get that, but then the courts are pretty sketchy anymore.....even w/o the alterations to the content, you can't rebroadcast w/o permission......
[ link to this | view in chronology ]