AT&T Exec Claims EFF's Mocking NSA Logo Creates A 'Chilling Effect'

Free Speech

from the and-if-anyone-knows-about-chilling-effects... dept

Mon, Mar 3rd 2014 8:47am — Mike Masnick

For quite some time, the good folks at EFF have offered awesome NSA Spying Hoodies with their brilliantly re-imagined NSA logo:

You might notice the AT&T logo in the middle there. That's not there just for show. Many years before the world knew of Ed Snowden, an AT&T technician by the name of Mark Klein literally walked in the front door of the EFF's old offices, and revealed how the NSA was installing hardware directly on AT&T's premises to tap directly into the internet backbone, in order to collect basically all internet traffic.

This is the same hoodie that Snowden himself used to wear around the NSA office in Hawaii where he worked (his coworkers thought he was being ironic). Either way, the logo is pretty well known by now.

Not surprisingly, last week during the RSA conference, plenty of folks thought it would be an appropriate venue to wear the hoodie (or similar t-shirts). And guess who took offense? According to the NY Times, an anonymous AT&T exec claimed such a logo created a "chilling effect" on discussion:

Around San Francisco this week, some were seen sporting Electronic Frontier Foundation T-shirts featuring a retooled N.S.A. logo with an eagle using its talons to plug into the American telecom network, symbolized by AT&T. Asked about the T-shirts, one AT&T executive, who asked not to be named, said they had a chilling effect.

“There are many of us at AT&T who are disturbed by what we’ve been hearing about the N.S.A.,” this person said. “But when you see that,” he said, pointing to the T-shirts, “a conversation becomes impossible.”

I don't think that cowardly exec knows what a "chilling effect" really means. I'd argue that secretly giving the NSA full access to the internet backbone, to collect whatever data they want is what creates a real chilling effect. Opening up pretty much just about everyone to intrusive and excessive surveillance by a secretive government agency? That's a chilling effect. Having someone wearing a t-shirt or hoodie that makes fun of your company for allowing such surveillance? No, that's not a chilling effect. It's the opposite. It's called exercising their right to expression.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: chilling effect, eff, nsa, parody
Companies: at&t

26 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Designerfx (profile), 3 Mar 2014 @ 8:56am

Ah, I know what this is
This isn't chilling effects. It's this, turned from religion to corporations.

http://amptoons.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/christian_oppression_pie1.png

The "help help we're being oppressed" with AT&T attempting to be portrayed as the victim.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 3 Mar 2014 @ 8:57am

To be clear I think they are disturbed that citizens are now aware of how complicit in the spying on everyone who touched an ATT network they were.
The conversation isn't impossible because of a logo, it is impossible because the company refuses to admit for how long, how deep, and how helpful they were to these programs. They didn't give a damn when they were being paid to assist but suddenly they worry about their image.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 3 Mar 2014 @ 9:00am
  
  Re:
  "They didn't give a damn when they were being paid to assist but suddenly they worry about their image."
  
  Because now it is starting to have a chilling effect on their salaries. ;)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 3 Mar 2014 @ 9:20am
  
  Re:
  Just throwing it out there that they probably had no choice in being vocal about what they were doing. NSLs and all that jazz. Still dicks but their silence could well have been forced.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - That Anonymous Coward (profile), 3 Mar 2014 @ 9:31am
    
    Re: Re:
    There are courts to appeal to if one has the will.
    The letters are powerful, but not all powerful.
    
    It was cheaper to go along, than to stand up for the customers, their rights, or the rule of law.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - John Fenderson (profile), 3 Mar 2014 @ 10:29am
    
    Re: Re:
    "they probably had no choice in being vocal about what they were doing. NSLs and all that jazz."
    
    Yes, but they were completely silent about their compliance to these sorts of requests even before NSLs gags were a thing, so that doesn't excuse them at all.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Designerfx (profile), 3 Mar 2014 @ 10:58am
    
    Re: Re:
    Lots of companies have tried to fight back on NSL's, in fact that's how they became public.
    
    Guess who didn't? AT&T.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The Wanderer (profile), 12 Mar 2014 @ 3:50pm
  
  Re:
  Beyond that:
  
  The only reason an AT&T employee or other representative should be uncomfortable at the sight of this logo is if they actually agree with, or otherwise support, the policies, principles, and attitudes which the logo is trying to call out.
  
  If they disagree with those policies, and agree with the ideas behind the logo, then there's no reason they should feel uncomfortable, and no reason discussion should be in any way inhibited.
  
  If they do agree with those policies, then making them uncomfortable helps put pressure on them to change their minds, and thereby to increase opposition to those policies - which is exactly what the logo is all about.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Michael, 3 Mar 2014 @ 9:16am

If the logo chilled him - I have a hoodie he can wear...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 3 Mar 2014 @ 11:22am
  
  Re:
  My thought was, isn't that what a hoodie is for - protecting against a chilling effect?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rich Fiscus (profile), 3 Mar 2014 @ 9:18am

Clearly a chilling effect is when people stop believing AT&T.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Mar 2014 @ 9:24am

Not Alone
I have the same logo, issued last year, with the Verizon logo in place of ATT. Just waiting for all of the rest of them.
.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 3 Mar 2014 @ 10:27am
  
  Re: Not Alone
  they are selling the whole multi-vendor collectors set.
  
  if you act now, you can still get a limted edition EUBR edition...but this one has white out on it now.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
scotts13 (profile), 3 Mar 2014 @ 9:26am

A conversation becomes impossible...
...because someone has the facts right on their shirt. That makes prevarication impossible (not, IMHO, a bad thing). The chill is going down the AT&T reps spine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ehud Gavron (profile), 3 Mar 2014 @ 9:36am

Thank you for the reminder.
I have now paid the 2014 EFF Titanium Level membership fee.

Thanks for the reminder, TechDirt, and AT&T!

Ehud
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Eric Goebelbecker (profile), 3 Mar 2014 @ 9:51am

For a second there...
For a second there I was wondering why an AT&T executive would even attempt to participate in such a discussion, then I realized it was at an NSA, er I mean RSA, conference.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Mar 2014 @ 10:34am

Spoken like a true corporate shill.

If anything, it's a conversation starter - unless, of course, you happen to be CEO of a multibillion dollar telecommunications giant who is complicit in said spying. The poor, thieving, stinking rich bastard... Break out the violins and let's hear his sob story about how he and his company are the "real" victims here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- David, 3 Mar 2014 @ 12:02pm
  
  Suddenly it makes sense:
  Spoken like a true corporate shill.
  
  He was actually talking about a "shilling effect".
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Mar 2014 @ 11:47am

If it had a chilling effect on him, then it worked...
Maybe now he won't be so hot to get in bed with the NSA knowing that people out there are speaking out against this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Mar 2014 @ 12:10pm

�There are many of us at AT&T who are disturbed by what we�ve been hearing about the N.S.A.,� this person said. �But when you see that,� he said, pointing to the T-shirts, �a conversation becomes impossible.�

Just another weak-spined millionaire pussy who's only NOW upset about his compliance with what is now an unpopular program.

The conversation is impossible because of secret courts, writing secret decisions, that must remain secret.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 3 Mar 2014 @ 12:20pm
  
  Re:
  Exactly, it's not the people upset about it that are causing the chilling effects here, it's the government agencies that seek to keep it a secret from the American public, and the corporations that are going along with it without a second though.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anon, 3 Mar 2014 @ 4:47pm

Cold in here
So AT&T feels that their complicity with the NSA in spying on American citizens has a chilling effect? Or that documentation of their complicity does? Truth hurts? What exactly is their position, because I'd love to know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Daemon_ZOGG, 3 Mar 2014 @ 7:44pm

"..anonymous AT&T exec claimed such a logo created a "chilling effect""
I find nothing "chilling" about this. I've known about this since the 1980s. Only, wasn't able to prove it back then. Yes. There really are "black boxes" in strategic AT&T locations. Able to monitor phone calls and the backbone of the internet (that means you, me, everybody, and your grandma). Here's to a brave new world. May the common people of the world prevail.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bergman (profile), 3 Mar 2014 @ 10:42pm

chilling effects inhibit actions, right?
So why is inhibiting actions that are dishonest, probably illegal and certainly contrary to the spirit of our entire legal system a bad thing?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Joe, 4 Mar 2014 @ 5:58am

Great shirt
I'd buy one if it was $20. $75 for a hoodie seems in line with government toilet costs...3x the actual costs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2014 @ 8:16am
  
  Re: Great shirt
  It's expensive, yes. But it's costly because the funds help support the EFF. They've done so many great things I scraped together enough to buy more than one. It's a small price to pay in the long run and I'm sure the money is used much more wisely and for a better purpose than providing excess for government employees.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]