Toronto Asked To Ban Dangerous Dr. Seuss Book For Promoting Violence
from the human-race-has-been-lost dept
When we discuss book bans, we typically discuss them in terms of being revolted by the myopic viewpoint of those doing the banning. For instance, Tim Cushing recently wrote about one book that was banned, despite being an award-winning novel, for including some fairly mild language dealing with sexuality and masturbation. In that case, some parents went to the police to keep teenagers from passing out the books anyway, as if some kind of school book ban had the force of law. That was, obviously, quite a silly situation.
But we shouldn't let this taint all book-banning activities. After all, some books are truly dangerous. Take the tome of violence-advocacy recently targeted for banishment by the Toronto library system, for instance, and see if you can't find it in your heart to admit that some books are too dangerous to be allowed.
Librarians at the Toronto Public Library were asked to remove copies of Dr. Seuss’ 1963 children's book "Hop on Pop” from the establishment’s collection because it allegedly promotes violence. A document detailing the seven books the library has been asked to remove over the past year was posted online on Monday.Now, I know what you're thinking: "But, Tim, it's a harmless rhyming children's book. It isn't promoting violence!" Well, you're not fooling anyone. It seems pretty clear to me that this book, written by some guy named Dr. Seuss (probably a terrorist), is being actively promoted as a way to quite literally stomp out fathers. Think of the children.....that will never be born because other children are stomping on men's two-bits at the behest of some 1960's love-child Dr. of death! This will not stand!
The book “encourages children to use violence against their fathers,” according to the complaint.
The Materials Review Committee pointed out that the book is “humorous,” “well-loved” and that it has “appeared on many ‘Best of’ children’s book lists.” The MRC also pointed out that the children in the Pulitzer Prize-winning author’s book are actually told not to hop on pop.Nobody's buying it, MRC. These are probably the same people that told us there were WMDs in Iraq and that 9/11 wasn't just a false-flag operation orchestrated by a zombie Hitler that's kept in an underground bunker beneath the Grand Canyon. You can't fool us. A tiny fraction of people in Toronto want this book banned, damn it.
Despite the complaint, the library opted to retain the book in the children's collection.Does government overreach know no bounds? We say "don't tread on me," and they house this book that literally tells children (except it doesn't) to tread on their fathers? Canadians, write your Congressmen (or whatever it is you call them up there). Something must be done.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: banned books, dr. seuss, hop on pop, libraries, toronto
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Well....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They flew away like birds.
My mouth has not even an ahem.
Dr. Suess must have stole them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Because it was violent, unsafe for kids.
YOUR FUCKING MAYOR DOES CRACK, YOUR POINT IS IRRELEVANT!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I do not like it on a boat
I do not like it in a train
No Sam, your censorship is in vain
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Find out who the "unnamed complainant" is - thanks, that would be great.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Some people are so confused they don't identify with anything!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
-Said no one ever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It could be worse
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It could be worse
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It could be worse
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It could be worse
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It could be worse
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It could be worse
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It could be worse
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm guessing it's a made up story for their odd news page.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://www.torontopubliclibrary.ca/content/about-the-library/pdfs/board/meetings/2014/apr28/15_ 1.pdf
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Anonymous Coward
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This list with their reasons is here (pdf).
http://www.torontopubliclibrary.ca/content/about-the-library/pdfs/board/meetings/2014/apr28/15 _1.pdf
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
However, it could just be meant to imply that the number of complaints about a book are dwarved by the number of non-complaints from actual readers.
At any rate, pretty much all complaints in this report sound rather absurd to me: the books/films basically appear to match their covers and rating, so people should know what they are dealing with when borrowing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Although this isn't necessarily a defense of appropriateness, it does show that the individual who requested the removal has a different barometer for appropriateness than the majority of the library-going public.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO BRING BALANCE TO OUR IDIOCY!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Give the Canadians some credit. Toronto Public Library did NOT ban the book.
I've got no explanation for Rob Ford, however. But then, I'm from California, and we elected the Governator. Twice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A sad day...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nuts exist in the world! Someplace! Ha ha ha!
Snooze.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Nuts exist in the world! Someplace! Ha ha ha!
I am pretty sure that the fact that you can read the title of this article and not KNOW that it is about the impending banishment of a classic children's book is the actual point and he is not trying to convince people that the book is actually be banned somewhere.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Nuts exist in the world! Someplace! Ha ha ha!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
read before over reacting
Just like video games can create and help plan violence etc... they can.
But those are merely the "straw that breaks the camels back" in a persons mind. ANYTHING could be that straw. Even something "positive". (eg... Give a kid a book and he gets pissed because his parents never gave him a book)
Unless it's a book or a game etc... that has brainwashed a person then there is always an underlying issue. If the book, game ALONE has brainwashed a person there is also an underlying issue.(as example.....Looking at books like the bible etc... and social circumstances that reinforce those views)
More striking at the branches while the root is untouched.
Any kids book may trigger violence. Ignoring that fact is intellectually dishonest. Just as dishonest as claiming the book was the cause.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They're called MPs, Mike. Members of Parliament
First it's all those American handguns flooding the border just south of Toronto, and now this particularly 'mercan
brand of stupity is invading Canada!
But then again, Toronto DOES keep re-electing Rob Ford, so glass houses and all that, I suppose.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They're called MPs, Mike. Members of Parliament
1. I did not write the article.
2. Did you not notice the tone of the entire article and how he was purposely saying ridiculous things the entire time? Did it not occur to you that he purposely made that mistake?
There there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They're called MPs, Mike. Members of Parliament
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think I might have to kill myself...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ban violence books
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sad, really. This place used to be fun and interesting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hop on Pop tl;dr
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
C'mon Techdirt. Hold yourself to a higher standard than that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Hopefully such attention will make the next blockhead think twice before trying to inflict their terminal lack of humor/wit/maturity on the world.
There's also the idea that the 'threat' of such attention will likely keep such attempts from working as it makes the ones being 'asked' to take down (insert content here) know that if they do so, their action is going to go public, and everyone will get to review and comment on it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I have Green Eggs and Ham and I know how to use them!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Violence in Hop On Pop
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Next up: "Green Eggs And Ham"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The author is writing under a pseudonym, his real name is Theodor Seuss Geisel.
Therefore he must be a terrorist!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]