Four Years Is Long Enough: The DOJ Should End Its Grand Jury Investigation Into Wikileaks
from the file-charges-or-drop-it dept
For many years, it's been widely known, if not officially confirmed, that the DOJ had a grand jury investigation going on against Julian Assange and Wikileaks. As far back as early 2011, it was already quite clear that they didn't have enough evidence to actually make a case against him. They were so desperate that they tortured Chelsea Manning and offered her a plea deal if she would lie, and claim, falsely, that Assange "conspired" with her. Last fall, we noted that some in the DOJ were finally admitting that they had no case, but as of the end of April, the investigation was still happening.A very long list of human rights and press freedom groups have now sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder, asking him to end the criminal investigation and admit that nothing criminal was done by Assange or Wikileaks in relation to publishing classified information leaked to it by Manning (and, potentially, others).
In a recent meeting with media representatives, you promised that “as long as I am attorney general, no reporter who is doing his job is going to go to jail.” Yet, the continued criminal investigation and other persecution of WikiLeaks and Mr. Assange puts them at serious risk. Well-respected legal scholars across the political spectrum have stated that a prosecution of WikiLeaks or Mr. Assange for publishing classified material or interacting with sources could criminalize the newsgathering process and put all editors and journalists at risk of prosecution.It's doubtful that this will do any good, but it's important to keep highlighting issues like this, and how the administration has failed, badly, to live up to its promises. Unfortunately, rather than actually doing the right thing, all too often, the administration seems to decide to double down on its strategy.
There is growing international recognition that new media organisations are creating new channels for political debate and play a crucial role in maintaining transparency and democratic forms of government. The US Government made freedom of expression on the Internet one of the priorities of its foreign policy; this commitment must not be limited to the international arena. Thus, we are concerned that actions against Wikileaks undermine the commitment of the US Government to freedom of speech
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: bradley manning, chelsea manning, doj, eric holder, free press, free speech, grand jury, human rights, journalism, julian assange, wikileaks
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
...if she would lie, and claim...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My point is the US government is opening breaking their own laws and rights citizens have. Why on earth would they stop doing these illegal acts when asked nicely by human rights organizations.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Might makes right! Show me any place on Earth where people do not need a police force to 'Protect' themselves with!
That's right... it was a good ole West... no longer a Fad in the US. We no longer mount up posses and go after dirt bags... we really should return to this behavior.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ya know
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We have always been in litigation with East Asia
Sounds like a perfect job for a few associates who create billable hours and worthless paper. A creative law firm wouldn't even need actual associates.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A Reporter's Job
Well there you have it. Of course, a reporter's job is to report what the government tell them to. Yeah, I see how that works.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A Reporter's Job
That statement was taken totally out of context. At the time, he was talking about Josh Earnest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A Reporter's Job
There's a reason the executive has bargained for permission to kill on American soil on presidential order.
Of course, "on presidential order" will be subject to interpretation like "judicial warrant" is. You cannot pester important people for every bad guy you are going to take out.
It's the spirit that counts. Trust them, they are professionals.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A much better title, if you ask me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Issues
As long as Assange hides in the embassy looking incredibly guilty, the grand jury will likely not be shut down. His level of concern about being extradited to the US really suggests that he feels that there is enough there for charges.
It's like chess. Julian will very likely get bored of his self imposed prison a long time before the US government gets bored of waiting for them to come out to play.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Issues
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Issues
Rumors mean nothing.
"His level of concern about being extradited to the US really suggests that he feels that there is enough there for charges."
I have no idea if he feels that he has broken the law or not. I do know, however, that given the political landscape in the US right now, were I in his shoes I'd react exactly the same way even if I were as innocent as a newborn baby. There is zero reason to believe that people who have caused the US embarrassment will get anything remotely close to a fair trial.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Issues
Your strategy depends on your mark being a retard with no foresight. Ha ha, sorry, but not everyone is as silly as you'd like them to be.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But while we have the Grand Jury assembled:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"double down" ... or martingale?
The Obama/Holder "betting" strategy seems much more than simple double-down (as in blackjack) it's grotesquely martingale: sinking ever-increasing amounts endlessly through loss after loss after loss, in the hope of eventually prevailing -- rather than just accepting one's loss and moving on.
It's ironic that "double down" often gets used by writers to describe a process of stubbornly dragging something out, since doubling down in blackjack shortens the game by bringing it to a quick end.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Like that will happen
But they're not ending it until everyone thinks WikiLeaks is some kind of plumbing fault, and everyone associated with the site is in Guantanamo.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Assange is not considered to a be a reporter by this administration.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Almost could have been a two-part thing 'The DOJ should stop it's grand jury investigation...' '... but actions like this are why it won't.'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Coincidence?
If it's one thing Snowden has taught me it is that you can't be too paranoid...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]