Files About UK's Role In CIA Renditions 'Accidentally' Destroyed
from the yeah,-right dept
Remember how the tapes of the CIA's torture campaign were "destroyed" under suspicious circumstances, despite orders not to destroy them? It appears something similar has happened in the UK, where files on the UK's role in CIA rendition efforts have been "accidentally destroyed." I'm wondering if anyone can read that claim without rolling their eyes.When Tyrie asked the Foreign Office (FCO) to explain which government department keeps a list of flights which passed through Diego Garcia from January 2002 to January 2009, FCO minister Mark Simmonds replied: "Records on flight departures and arrivals on Diego Garcia are held by the British Indian Ocean Territory immigration authorities. Daily occurrence logs, which record the flights landing and taking off, cover the period since 2003. Though there are some limited records from 2002, I understand they are incomplete due to water damage."Convenient story. As the report notes, this follows earlier vehement denials from the UK government that Diego Garcia was used for rendition... only to later have to admit that they were lying.
The Foreign Office would not say whether the damaged files were UK or US records, or say where they were located. An FO spokesperson maintained that because the damage "was only recently discovered" it did not know how or when it occurred.
Ministers of successive governments have repeatedly given misleading or incomplete information about the CIA's use of Diego Garcia. In February 2008, the then foreign secretary, David Miliband, was forced to apologise to MPs and explain that Tony Blair's "earlier explicit assurances that Diego Garcia had not been used for rendition flights" had not been correct. Miliband said at this point that two rendition flights had landed, but that the detainees on board had not disembarked.Once again, it appears that the intelligence community is more focused on covering its tracks than on making sure it's not violating everyone's rights.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cia, destroyed, diego garcia, evidence, rendition, uk
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Well
I used to work in business administration, and we used a file destruction service that had two ways of destroying documents: shredding and pulping.Pulping is basically mixing the documents into a water solution until they are turned into pulp. Clever name, I know.
As is always the case, based on the wording used, he is probably technically right; I'm sure the documents were "water damaged."
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
We will produce very little damage, we swear.
Signed: we the people.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The same thing happened to some of the detainees in Guantanamo bay.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Well
Pulping is basically mixing the documents into a water solution until they are turned into pulp. Clever name, I know.
As is always the case, based on the wording used, he is probably technically right; I'm sure the documents were "water damaged."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Water damage
I'm guessing the damage occurred when they flushed the evidence of their complicity in torture and murder down the toilet.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sure... and Clinton smoked but didnt inhale. We believe ya. /s
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Well
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The winter of 1967 ...
James Hacker: How am I going to explain the missing documents to "The Mail"?
Sir Humphrey Appleby: Well, this is what we normally do in circumstances like these.
James Hacker: [reads memo] This file contains the complete set of papers, except for a number of secret documents, a few others which are part of still active files, some correspondence lost in the floods of 1967...
James Hacker: Was 1967 a particularly bad winter?
Sir Humphrey Appleby: No, a marvellous winter. We lost no end of embarrassing files.
James Hacker: [reads] Some records which went astray in the move to London and others when the War Office was incorporated in the Ministry of Defence, and the normal withdrawal of papers whose publication could give grounds for an action for libel or breach of confidence or cause embarrassment to friendly governments.
James Hacker: That's pretty comprehensive. How many does that normally leave for them to look at?
James Hacker: How many does it actually leave? About a hundred?... Fifty?... Ten?... Five?... Four?... Three?... Two?... One?... *Zero?*
Sir Humphrey Appleby: Yes, Minister.
http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0030013/quotes
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I think the moral of the story is that the courts should order the agencies to preserver all the information they have collected, thereby it will all accidentally be destroyed... =P
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Double standard
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
from what i read, though, he was a hoover when it came to cocaine...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Well
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
On the other hand, because history is often written by the victor and the victor is very often the bad guy, it takes a special kind of mind to read between the lines and determine the truth from the BS that is often the sole content of some parts of available history.
For those whose only contact with history is from high school education, utter ignorance of reality might be better than what they walk away with, awareness wise.
[ link to this | view in thread ]