Ridiculous Lawsuit Filed (And Now Dropped) Against Tor Project Gets Even More Ridiculous: Now Involving Hate Group Leader
from the wait,-what? dept
So, yesterday we wrote about the already bizarre lawsuit filed by Jason Lee Van Dyke, a Texas lawyer, on behalf of Shelby Conklin, against a revenge porn site, Pinkmeth, and (even more ridiculous), the Tor Project. There were many, many problems with the lawsuit, starting with the cluelessness of Van Dyke in going after the Tor Project, when he clearly had no idea what it was or did, or any idea about how Section 230 of the CDA works (in fact, it appears he misrepresented a similar case, in which GoDaddy was protected by Section 230). There were also some problems with the First Amendment aspects of this, and Van Dyke's argument that aiding someone in being anonymous was some sort of aiding and abetting of law-breaking. Thankfully, this morning Van Dyke admitted that he was dropping the Tor Project from the lawsuit -- though he doesn't appear to have apologized or admitted to his own errors. Instead, it appears he's been doubling down -- which we'll get to later in this post.But first, the story has taken a different twist, as Jay Wolman in our comments pointed to something even more bizarre: Van Dyke claimed that Pinkmeth's "address" (also where he had the lawsuit served) was the same address as Kyle Bristow, Esq. Pinkmeth had previously facetiously indicated that Bristow was its attorney (and uses a picture of Bristow on its Twitter account). But it's clear that whoever is behind Pinkmeth is joking. Bristow and Van Dyke have worked together to try to shut down revenge porn sites like Pinkmeth in the past, and Pinkmeth is clearly mocking Van Dyke by claiming that Bristow is its lawyer.
But Van Dyke still "served" Pinkmeth at Bristow's offices, knowing that it's bogus. As Wolman notes, since Van Dyke knows this is not actually Pinkmeth's offices, what he's done clearly borders on "fraud on the court." Meanwhile, our friends at Above the Law have even more on this situation, including the fact that Bristow was declared the leader of a hate group while he was in college, who has openly advocated racist and homophobic positions.
As for why Bristow, who appears to have rather stone-aged views of the world, is now focused on fighting revenge porn? Well, his argument kind of speaks for itself:
“Revenge pornography is nothing more than a manifestation of liberalism,” Bristow said. “Most victims on revenge pornography websites are young, white, blonde, middle class, American women. Women who the pornographers can link to conservatism or Christianity are especially targeted for harassment.”Yes, as Above the Law notes, Bristow is against revenge porn because it's "defiling white blondes in an effort to undermine Christianity." As bad as we think revenge porn sites and their operators are, somehow I doubt that's the goal. Either way, Van Dyke pretending to believe that his buddy Bristow actually represents Pinkmeth is just the latest in a long line of problems with the lawsuit...
Meanwhile, as another commenter on our original story pointed out, Van Dyke appears to be freaking out on Facebook, threatening to sue people who are posting negative reviews of his firm:
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: fraud on the court, jason lee van dyke, jason van dyke, kyle bristow, revenge porn, shelby conklin
Companies: pinkmeth, tor project
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
there, FTFY...
(sorry Josh, but if you are not for the free speech of your worst enemy spouting his most vile speech, you are -alas- not for free speech at all... it turns out -like MOST sheeple who do not understand the concept- you are for speech 'you like'...)
further, i would only say i think it is HIGHLY instructive how often it turns out that the most vehement -for example- anti-gay crusaders turn out to be tapping their toes in a wide stance in public restrooms... funny how often that turns out to be the case...
thus, ninja's joking speculation may have more validity to it than a simple insult to the guy... would NOT surprise me given how many times that turns out to be so...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I didn't see Josh demanding that the joke be suppressed, only expressing that he found it offensive. That's fair. I don't see a contradiction with the notion of valuing free speech at all: he was just using that same freedom to express his reaction to another's speech.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I just don't think child molestation is a joking matter. The Techdirt community is better than that (including Ninja, who frequently has very good one-liners).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm almost wishing Van Dyke knew about Reddit ... that would ratchet this show up even further.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
There'll be lols when Van Dyke comes
Tough-guy lawyer lost his cool
Don't you stop trollin'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
#DIV/0
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The threat of violence might cause him a problem though. It's not a real direct threat, but I could see the bar issuing him a warning for that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Sounds like a pretty clear indication of a desire for violence to me. Combine that with his offers of cash payouts for personal information of the various posters, and seems like it would be pretty easy to convince a judge he's asking for that information for... 'less than legal' reasons.
Possibly enough for a restraining order at least, and wouldn't that be fun if he had a bunch of those attached to his name.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
https://storify.com/doxbin/meantxlawyer-doesn-t-understand-tor
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I've never beaten any woman or been accused of beating a woman. Of course, if you were a woman, I'd make an exception.
Apparently, he is unwilling to go to blows with the owner of Pinkmeth unless it's a woman - then he's ready to throw down.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let's hope people take him up on that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Please keep trolling him. PLEASE.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
P.L.L.C.
Pissant Little Legal Challenges...?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
An odd choice, to be sure.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Also, whoever sent the link (and had his name redacted) was probably not Mike or one of the other techdirt authors, but some bystander who sent the lawyer the link for the lulz and then took screenshots (sending them to Mike) for even more lulz.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
"Separately, when someone sent him a copy of my original article..."
Names have been changed/redacted to protect the non-morons.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
An odd choice, to be sure.
No, that screenshot, penis-shaped redactions and all, was posted by someone else in the FB thread.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://cdc.texasbar.com/cdc/Home/Index
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Has anyone filed a grievance yet?
It bounced around their offices and ended up with a nice lady suggesting I file a formal grievance.
I replied that since I am not a client of his, nor a resident of Texas, I don't think I have standing to file.
I have yet to hear back from her.
Too bad...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Has anyone filed a grievance yet?
The State Bar of Texas publishes "Grievance and Ethics Information".
Under that topic, there is a page on "Grievance Procedure".
You must, of course, determine whether this published information applies to your situation. If you need assistance, you may wish to engage the services of a qualified professional.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What is that, missionary?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Given how many anti-gay activists turn out to be self-hating homosexuals, it's probably "doggy style so we don't have to look each other in the eyes."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"When you want to go after an asshole, you don't do it by hiring a bigger asshole."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Order of The Supreme Court of Texas and The Court of Criminal Appeals
The conduct of a lawyer should be characterized at all times by honesty, candor, and fairness. In fulfilling his or her primary duty to a client, a lawyer must be ever mindful of the profession's broader duty to the legal system.
The Supreme Court of Texas and the Court of Criminal Appeals are committed to eliminating a practice in our State by a minority of lawyers of abusive tactics which have surfaced in many parts of our country. We believe such tactics are a disservice to our citizens, harmful to clients, and demeaning to our profession. The abusive tactics range from lack of civility to outright hostility and obstructionism. Such behavior does not serve justice but tends to delay and often deny justice. The lawyers who use abusive tactics instead of being part of the solution have become part of the problem.
The desire for respect and confidence by lawyers from the public should provide the members of our profession with the necessary incentive to attain the highest degree of ethical and professional conduct. These rules are primarily aspirational. Compliance with the rules depends primarily upon understanding and voluntary compliance, secondarily upon reinforcement by peer pressure and public opinion, and finally when necessary by enforcement by the courts through their inherent powers and rules already in existence."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hey, he responded to my review...off to google and yelp :P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
huh. TIL that Uranus has rings, too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
found his yelp
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Making "revenge porn" look good
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How long until Van Dyke says his Facebook was hacked?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What Van Dyke Needs...
I'm confident that a prostate milking orgasm resulting from a behemoth of a butt-plug will finally give him the relief he's unconsciously yearning for.
Oh...and don't forget the anal ease Mr. Van Dyke...that initial penetration can sting a bit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Too bad
Thankfully, unlike the Tenenbaums of the world, it appears that this guy is going to get blown out long before he set precedent and makes everyone else suffer for his arrogance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Too bad
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Too bad
I don't support him. Please work on your reading skills, I thought I made that very plain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Too bad
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Too bad
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Service
In case he doesn't know, that means if the sherriff can't find the defendant's house, then he can't serve the notice by handing it to the person or taping it to the door with scotch tape.
Then when you get into court, the judge asks where the defendant is, and the plaintiff says they couldn't find him.
Then the case is dismissed.
...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Service
Far too often, if you're talking about something going on 'on the internet', they don't dismiss the case, instead they hand the prosecution everything they asked for, no matter how outlandish it is.
As a recent example, not too long ago there was a case where a judge allowed Microsoft to seize a ton of domains from another company, because they managed to convince the judge that they were of 'imminent danger' and needed to be dealt with immediately, all without informing the company that was running/owned them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thank you
I'm not sure on the chronology, but it appears he's trying to explain away the service on Bristow in the ATL article (page 3). He admits he knows it is bogus and seems to be asserting that their joke acts to appoint Bristow as an agent for service of process.
In the law of agency, that would be apparent authority. However, apparent authority is not a tenet of due process of which proper service is a part. Further, even if it were, actual knowledge of the alleged agent's true status and lack of actual authority would defeat any claim of apparent authority. No reasonable person with that knowledge would rely on the listing of Bristow.
Plaintiff cannot or should not get a default judgment where the defendant has not been served. It should not survive a motion to dismiss and my bet is Texas does have mechanisms to protect a defendant's anonymity. Nor would a default judgment do any good--if you cannot identify a real or legal person, then you have a worthless piece of paper. The method to enforce an injunction is a contempt proceeding against a person you cannot find. It is a waste of effort.
You have a revenge porn claim? Call Adam Steinbaugh. He'll put you in touch with a good attorney.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Thank you
Who would make such a motion? Answer: The defendant. Since that person (or persons) chooses to be unreachable, they end up with no voice in court. At that point, it's totally up to the judge what to do, and most of them appear to give the plaintiff everything they are looking for, even if it is an unenforceable judgement because they have no way to make it work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Thank you
If that person *is* actually unknown and unable to be served how is there a actually a case in the first place? In this case, a default judgement against some unnamed John Doe isn't going to get the website taken down anyways, so I'm not sure of point of it all.
And just out of curiosity, how do you reconcile the use of Tor with the firm stance the courts have held on allowing anonymity? In SCOTUS's own words:
Wouldn't removing the shield that Tor and similar projects provide undermine the doctrines we have always held concerning anonymity?
When SCOTUS wrote that, I'm sure they had to realize that anonymity does allow some people to do bad things, but they still held that allowing anonymity is more important to our society.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This right here should be newsworthy for you guys.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
he thinks that everyone responding is one evil hacker from some hacker forum i've never heard of. i'm oddly complimented
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Getting beat in Brazilian Ju-Jitsu
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How did she find out about that adult site in the first place? I thought you needed a special tool to visit sites on TOR and who says her video/pictures ain't on sites like eporner, http://theporndude.com/, xvideos, etc. What's so special about this pink meth site? Does anybody have an image or something, since I don't feel like installing TOR.
Looks like this girl is trying to golddig from her own stupidity, but it's a lost case. Others chicks would follow her example and the courts would be doing overtime big time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This should not be happening.
People need to watch more porn movies
https://www.filmespornos.net/ (Filmes Pornos)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]