More Yahoo vs. The NSA: Government Tried To Deny Standing, Filed Supporting Documents Yahoo Never Got To See
from the blindfolded-and-pickpocketed dept
After having the court documents unsealed and the gag order lifted, Yahoo is finally free to talk about that one time when the government wanted to fine it $250,000 a day [!!] for refusing to comply with a FISA court order to turn over data on its customers. Two of the lawyers (Mark Zwillinger and Jacob Sommer) who represented Yahoo in that court battle, have written a post detailing the behind-the-scenes activity.
First off, they note that it's kind of amazing they're even able to discuss it at this point.
Having toiled in secret until recently, and having originally been told we would need to wait 25 years to tell anyone of our experience, it is refreshing to be able to write about the case in detail.That's the normal declassification schedule, which at this point would still be nearly 18 years away. Fortunately, Ed Snowden's leaks have led to an accelerated schedule for many documents related to the NSA's surveillance programs, as well as fewer judges being sympathetic to FOIA stonewalling and exemption abuse.
We've talked several times about how the government makes it nearly impossible to sue it for abusing civil liberties with its classified surveillance programs. It routinely claims that complainants have no standing, ignoring the fact that leaked documents have given us many details on what the NSA does and doesn't collect. But in Yahoo's case, it went against its own favorite lawsuit-dismissal ploy.
First, the government's prior position on standing may be a bit of a surprise. In more recent cases, like Clapper, it has argued that only the provider has standing to challenge surveillance orders under the FISA Amendments Act, not individual users who may have been caught up in the surveillance. But, in this fight, the government argued that Yahoo had no standing to challenge a directive on the basis of the Fourth Amendment rights of its users.The government definitely would prefer the swift removal of cases rather than actually having to defend its programs' Constitutionality -- so much so that it attempted to push the argument that no one has standing to challenge its collections. But that wasn't the government's only angle. The courts refused to entertain this sudden shift in the government's "standing" argument, so it moved on to levying fines.
A very short time frame to respond was granted to Yahoo, something made even shorter by the government's foot-dragging.
The FISC issued its decision on April 25, 2008, but we were not permitted to inspect the order until April 29, 2008 (and even then were not allowed to take notes), and did not receive a copy until May 5, 2008, when the government demanded that Yahoo give a same-day answer whether it would comply with the surveillance demand.Shortly after Yahoo's response, the government moved for contempt charges and fines. $250,000 per day was the minimum. It asked for constantly-escalating fines that would double each week until Yahoo complied. Even for a tech giant, this fee scale could turn into real money incredibly quickly.
Simple math indicates that Yahoo was facing fines of over $25 million dollars for the 1st month of noncompliance, and fines of over $400 million in the second month if the court went along with the government’s proposal. And practically speaking, coercive civil fines means that the government would seek increased fines, with no ceiling, until Yahoo complied.While the government was threatening Yahoo with massive fines, it was also filing secret briefs and motions in support of its admittedly "coercive" levies, stating that the company's resistance was causing "great harm," apparently on a daily basis.
Finally, the documents that were recently released by the ODNI (and Yahoo itself) contain many that Yahoo -- who was directly involved in this court battle -- had never seen before August 22.The government filed ex parte documents in support of its surveillance program, many of which Yahoo had no access to during the legal struggle. Not only did the government force Yahoo to respond on its own schedule, but it kept the company in the dark about its justifications and other aspects of its programs. Yahoo couldn't ask for these documents in discovery, nor did it even know these existed.
[P]erhaps most importantly, a FISC decision from January 15, 2008 regarding the procedures for the DNI/AG Certification at issue, which Yahoo had never seen. It examines those procedures under a “clearly erroneous” standard of review – which is one of the most deferential standards used by the judiciary. Yahoo did not have these documents at the time, nor the opportunity to conduct any discovery. It could not fully challenge statements the government made, such as the representation to FISCR “assur[ing the Court] it does not maintain a database of incidentally collected information from non-targeted United States persons, and there is no evidence to the contrary.” Nor could Yahoo use the January 15, 2008 decision to demonstrate how potential flaws in the targeting process translated into real world effects.When it comes to the nation's security, apparently no legal deck can be stacked high enough. The government forces those who challenge its secret programs to wage courtroom battles with only the barest minimum of information. And, should it decide the defendant isn't moving fast enough, it can pursue exorbitant (and admittedly coercive) fines until it gets the cooperation it's seeking.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: doj, fines, fisa, fisa court, nsa, paa, prism, privacy, standing, surveillance, threats
Companies: yahoo
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
This is the type of behavior one expects from oppressive and abusive governments such as China, North Korea and Iran. But, this is the United States we're talking about here.
They every one belong in prison cells for the rest of their natural lives.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is clearly a violation, so why not just ignore the court orders and tell people "Yo, the government is fining us to get access to your data. Do something, or forgo your 4th Amendment rights."
If companies did this 10 years ago, it's highly unlikely the NSA would have the power it wields today.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When you are getting jail time for not following rights-violating orders
If Yahoo transferred all their assets abroad and blew the whistle publicly, we might have been able to salvage the irredeemable situation our nation is now in.
(I mean as much as I have fantasies that we'll be able to reform the government and get back our freedoms within the system, it's a long swim up the proverbial river, and against rapids.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: When you are getting jail time for not following rights-violating orders
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
How exactly US differs? USSR had a secret law. US has a secret law ("national security" - and you'll never know what hit you). Everyone was a lawbreaker there, only not everyone was prosecuted (on authorities discretion) - just like in US (http://www.infowars.com/you-break-the-law-every-day-without-even-knowing-it/). Everyone (almost) there was claiming country's superiority, many believed it (and it is the same now). Just like US. And they were pushing their ways on others. Just like US.
What have you done to your country, that it is going to dogs?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And don't forget that up until the 2000s, big business was routinely painted as evil. Nobody would trust them when they complained about what the government was doing. Now suddenly Yahoo has turned all Kim Dotcom and become heroes thanks to the government's malevolence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is what happens when false counselors whisper the word 'terrorism' into the ears of those who should know better.
This is what happens when the checks and balances of the great experiment called 'America' get thrown out.
This is what happens when uncaring men turn the course of a nation towards Empire.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is a friggin' Bill of Attainder, which is expressly forbidden under Article I, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The Constitution? What does Washington's toilet paper have to do with this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Coercive fines
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Coercive fines
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And there you go again - one large government hell bent on enforcement of its own laws at all cost. That's not corruption that's politically correct tyranny. These people believe the constitution to be more of a soft box playpen than the steadfast perimeters that once defined this nation state.
To Serve and Protect those that would otherwise be Free - Welcome to America, Century 21.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Antique Moral Compass for Sale
You may obtain this great piece of American History by filling out your DHS form for free gov't surplus equipment.
The winner will be announced shortly after the closing date for this years campaign contributions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Antique Moral Compass for Sale
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is not North Korea or 1950s Spain - this is modern-day America, for fuck's sake.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Much more efficient than those losers, isn't it?
This is modern-day America.
For fuck's sake, indeed. Get in line to bend over.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
When this happens you can know for certain that ALL the people in power are corrupt!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To top it all off, the US Gov then threatens to bankrupt one of the first and oldest internet search engines on the internet. Simply because Yahoo was attempting to defend the 4th Amendment rights of US citizens from being trampled on by the US Government.
I have to agree with a comment I read a few days ago. The entire US Government as gone rogue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Left = Control through Government.
Right = Control through Big Business.
I am predominantly conservative but fuck both of those notions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Solution
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yahoo vs NSA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As disappointed as i am in the governments actions at point. I am really disheartened that so many Americans that work for these agency have remained mute.
If the government doesn't respect the "Bill of Rights" then America no longer exists.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I mean, they go through all the trouble to set up a trap and bait it, and he had the gall not to stick his head in it, of course they're going to be furious with him! /s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Until millions of Americans lose their bread and circuses nothing will ever get better, but it will get a lot worse. As those in charge consolidate their power. Were just seeing them openly commit crimes now because Americans have proven for the most part they don't care if their government is a tyranny.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Or would that be land of the enslaved, home of the cowed
[ link to this | view in chronology ]