Why Hasn't The Obama Administration Weighed In On The FCC's Net Neutrality Comment Period?
from the take-a-backseat-to-no-one? dept
Marvin Ammori has a good article over at Slate questioning why the Obama White House does not appear to have submitted comments with the FCC concerning net neutrality. As you know by now, the FCC received over 3 million comments when the commenting period finally closed on Monday -- but so far, it does not appear that the Obama administration weighed in (it's possible that not all comments are in the database yet, but still...). While you might think this isn't a huge deal -- Obama has said he supports net neutrality (indeed, campaigned heavily on it originally), Ammori notes that it is somewhat odd. The administration frequently does submit its own comments on other FCC issues:The commenting period seems like it would have been the appropriate time for at least some part of the administration to weigh in. Even with 3 million other comments, a comment coming from the administration would not get lost in the process. Instead, the President seems to be more or less admitting that his campaign promises on net neutrality were simply empty promises.While President Obama campaigned heavily on net neutrality and recently reiterated his support for it, he hasn’t filed a thing to the FCC. The president has alluded to the FCC being an independent agency, and therefore suggested he should not publicly encourage the commission to fulfill his campaign promises. Yet since becoming president, his Executive Branch has submitted more than 200 filings to the FCC in over 80 proceedings. (If you want proof, see this spreadsheet.)
If the administration were to file comments, it might come through a White House office, such as the National Economic Council or the Office of Science & Technology Policy, or the Commerce Department’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). In 2009, the NTIA submitted comments telling the FCC that the “NTIA expects to offer views on the issues presented in [the network neutrality] rulemaking at the appropriate time.” You would think that we have reached the appropriate time. But President Obama has stood largely silent while his FCC chairman, Tom Wheeler, barrels toward dismantling an open Internet and threatening the entire economy that now rides atop it.
Obama has proclaimed that he “will take a backseat to no one in my commitment to network neutrality.” By not commenting in the FCC proceeding, the president has taken a back seat to dozens of tech companies, including Etsy, Kickstarter, Vimeo, Reddit, and Tumblr, the AARP, dozens of senators and members of Congress, and millions of people that have strongly filed or commented in favor of real, strong Title II network neutrality. It’s time for that to change.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: administration, barack obama, comment period, fcc, net neutrality, open internet, title ii
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Perfect excuse
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Perfect excuse
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Simple Answer
Oh, and then there is the money flowing from 'People' (aka corporations) that want to control the next election cycle. Can't let those democrats whom might benefit down.
One cannot control what one lets off the leash. This is not the way of doublethink (defined as the acceptance of or mental capacity to accept contrary opinions or beliefs at the same time, especially as a result of political indoctrination).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Simple Minds ...
Either McCain or Romney would have created paradise by now fer sure! But no ... look what we got instead.
Look it's simple, all the makers need are a few more tax breaks and then all us takers will get those awesome jobs at the end of the rainbow. Personally I can't wait - it's like being a kid at Christmas but the libtards declared war on that! Not to mention all the alien terrorist ebola infested children crossing the border.
Thanks Obama
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Simple Minds ...
Fact is, this mess started long ago, and was recognized by Eisenhower in his Military, Industrial, (newly added Intelligence) complex speech. We are still looking for a way out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Simple Minds ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Simple Minds ...
In a pseudo-democracy (fascist capitalists wearing democrat and republican badges), the goal is simply to fool the majority of people all of the time.
Apparently, the majority are the Simple Minds.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seriously, folks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
cause isis is a terrorist threat we need to bomb them now
{am i out of trouble with people at home yet }
cause isis is a terrorist threat we need to bomb them now
{are they listening to me }
cause isis is a terrorist threat we need to bomb them now
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why Hasn't The Obama Administration Weighed In On The FCC's Net Neutrality Comment Period?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Isn't Obama owned by big telecom and big media?
Are we asking that question just to point to this truth again?
Granted, he's lame duck anyway, but they could probably make his life uncomfortable. They could wreck the careers of his allies in his name.
But we've already established that our representatives are owned by monied interests, that ours is an oligarchy that has no interest in the welfare of the people except in regards to how it affects work forces, and that people don't vote for their best interests when they can be manipulated through campaigning and culture to do otherwise.
So there's no real question here: Comcast has Obama by the short-and-curlies and Obama is going to only do exactly what they say.
Eight years a slave.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They have no interest in having net nuetrality benefit you and I.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
re Obama's silence
Do ya think?
Seriously, do you ever think as opposed to just find the highest voltage outrage narrative that pops into our minds and grab it with both hands?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: re Obama's silence
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tell Obama about the fund-raising opportunity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Tell Obama about the fund-raising opportunity.
Using his image, name, and opinion would be a negative at this point.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]