DHS Agents Raid Lingerie Shop, Save America From Unlicensed Underwear
from the ever-vigilant-agency-on-top-of-nation's-bottoms dept
Your homeland has never been more secure. (h/t to Techdirt reader jupiterkansas)
“They came in and there were two guys” Honig said. “I asked one of them what size he needed and he showed me a badge and took me outside. They told me they were from Homeland Security and we were violating copyright laws.”Peregrine Honig runs a lingerie shop in Kansas City. Not coincidentally, her shop was raided by DHS agents just as the World Series commenced. The target? "Boy shorts" sporting an approximation of the Kansas City Royals logo as well as the cheekily-applied phrase (yes, pun completely intended) "Take the crown."
For purely illustrative purposes, here's the last known photo of the item now in the temporary possession of the Dept. of Homeland Security.
They placed the underwear in an official Homeland Security bag and had Honig sign a statement saying she wouldn’t use the logo.Which she technically didn't. It was her own drawing, but the DHS agents pointed out that "connecting the K and C" turned it into the protected property of a major league baseball franchise.
Up until the fortuitously-timed DHS raid, Honig had experienced no problems with law enforcement.
"We'd had so many cops come in and buy these," Peregrine Honig says.The DHS has yet to comment on its pre-World Series panty raid. Neither has ICE, which is also usually fairly active in the days leading up to major sporting events. Neither agency has bothered to issue a press release about the hard work done in service to the multibillion-dollar entities currently attempting to "take the crown."
Honig, however, has provided plenty of color commentary, including the fact that these particular DHS agents didn't appear to be reveling in their petty IP enforcement efforts.
She says you could tell “they [DHS agents] felt like they were kicking a puppy.”At least there's still a little shame left in overzealous trademark enforcement. This is part of what your $39 billion a year in mandatory contributions gets you: a few dozen pairs of underwear seized, most likely at a cost exceeding the retail value of the "counterfeit" goods.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: dhs, ice, lingerie, royals, trademark, underwear, world series
Companies: major league baseball
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Now, I'm sure some hand made art in underwear is surely destroying the revenue of major mafia bosses... Ahem, copyright/trademark holders. Yeah.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Good heavens!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This is a thing that happened
Why DHS?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The UK's ahead of the US on this
I'm sure that for a reasonable licencing fee the DHS could adapt this to something on the lines of "If you buy unauthorised merchandise, you're funding ISIL".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Well at least..
In the current policing environment, that's a win right?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: This is a thing that happened
Because they are the brown shirts of the US executive.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This could be fun...
This will spawn a whole new generation of Female Body Inspectors and Underwear Examiners...
Upcoming generations of schoolboys cheer this wonderful new idea from DHS.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: This could be fun...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Why confiscation?
This sort of thing not only makes the DHS look worse (no mean feat), but also makes the Royals look like a bunch of heavy-handed dicks.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The UK's ahead of the US on this
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I hope the boys had an explosively good time.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Pickup line
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Good job, guys! Someone could've hung himself with that unlicensed lingerie or something.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
it's getting more and more pathetic every day!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: The UK's ahead of the US on this
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Why confiscation?
Clearly, these women should have outsourced their copyright infringing production so that ICE could conduct its panty raid at the border instead of having to come into the shop and seize the product after delivery.
As for why they confiscated it when it is a trademark case, as the Techdirt piece mentions, the agents seem a bit confused about whether they're confiscating counterfeit panties or confiscating trademark-infringing panties. If they don't even know what they're really taking, it's not surprising that they're using the wrong procedure to do it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Thongs get DMCA takedown ?
Nevermind.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Is this Tech_dirt_?
I'd have expected to have this characterized as tongue-in-cheek. I mean, it is called Techdirt.
At any rate, the lettering on the photograph appears ambivalent between "Take the Crown" and "Take the town". Clever.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
In other news..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What a waste
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: This is a thing that happened
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: What a waste
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Rebranding
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: This is a thing that happened
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I would think DHS agents would gleefully kick puppies and club baby seals.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: What a waste
This was done FOR THE CHILDREN!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: This is a thing that happened
DHS raided an underwear store?
( •_•)
( •_•)>ರೃ
( ರೃ_•)
You're shitting me.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Also yes, trademark, not copyright, not counterfeiting. Warrant maybe? Someone had to order this illegal seizure, they damned well had better of left a paper trail.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Good heavens!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: This is a thing that happened
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
The one thing US law enforcement is against is paper trails for their own actions, and with plea bargaining with the leverage of charge inflation, they do not necessarily need evidence to put someone in jail.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Why confiscation?
I'd bet that it was the MLB office that filed the complaint, not the Royals. It's the World Series, and I'd bet that MLB has trademark restrictions not unlike the Olympics. Restrictions that are stricter than the regular season.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Why confiscation?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Well at least..
let's tick the boxes, shall we?
1. No due process
2. Possible violation of civil rights, Peregrine Honig is an woman from San Francisco, so we got 1. Woman owned businees person at least, 2. she is an artist, went to art school and based on wifeys re telling of art school she was gay at least for a minute...
3. No due process.
4. did I mention the due process bit?
.gov Again depriving the American People of hot-pants, privacy and civil-rights...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Max Headroom
Wait. I didn't know we were using stage names.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That Obvious Joke
Good for DHS for taking this threat to third base. Getting inside the underwear caper shows the kind of persistence we normally only expect from frat boys.
Godspeed, good DHS agents. If you keep inspecting underwear, sooner or later, you're going to find that dirty bomb.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Please, they were probably just bummed out that they'd never be able to brag about their latest bust. I mean really, "Oh yeah man, just last week we busted into a shop and seized a shipment of panties!" They'd never be able to live that one down.
And even if it was real regret for their actions, as others have noted, 'I knew it was wrong, but I was just following orders' doesn't fly, so they still get no sympathy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
DHS Panty Raid
Additionally, to insure that no contraband panties are being worn to the KC Royals home games during the World Series the Department of Homeland Security has further decreed that all panties must be worn on top of a persons outer clothing in order to ensure the safety of all trademark holders.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: This is a thing that happened
[ link to this | view in thread ]
REALLY?
2. Is this even in Job description of the DHS? NOT!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
There are so many broadly written federal laws on the books now that they can pretty much do anything they want and call it "legal".
"Yes, your honor, we tortured that man to death but we have secret legal interpretations of secret laws that make it all perfectly legal"
"Yes, your honor, we seized the funny underwear because we have laws that say we can seize pretty much anything we want."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: REALLY?
If they call them "counterfeit merchandise", then it is unfortunately in their job description.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Inspection
"What would the Federal Bureau of Invest-"
"No ma'am. The OTHER FBI.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Or is this just what most of us said would happen when they were granted the ability to label anyone they wanted criminals/terrorists, then arrest/charge/kill them based on whatever they wanted to then do to them.
you mean I get to say that guy that always pisses me off is a criminal without needing any evidence to back it up and then beat him up and charge him resisting arrest. How could I refuse becoming a member of the DHS then.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Why confiscation?
If that's true that is a terrible law.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
briefs not boyshorts
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: briefs not boyshorts
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Why confiscation?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Well at least..
We need to encourage each other to stop voting the same chumps in who make crap like this legal. We also need to kick up more of a fuss to embarrass them into stopping it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: DHS Panty Raid
[ link to this | view in thread ]