German Publishers Grant Google A 'Free License' Google Never Needed To Post News Snippets
from the well-that-solves-that dept
Remember earlier this year when German newspaper publishers, led by rights management firm VG Media, demanded Google pay them a massive amount of money (11% of all ad revenue on any page linking to their works) for having the gall to send those publishers traffic via Google News? VG Media insisted that Google's use of "snippets" was illegal. German regulators rejected this demand, but VG Media was still pursuing legal efforts to force Google to pay. Given that, Google did what made the most sense and removed the snippets for VG Media associated publishers. You'd think that this would make VG Media happy. Instead, it claimed that Google was engaged in "blackmail."Yes, VG Media claimed that using snippets was illegal, but getting rid of them was "blackmail." The logic of a legacy industry.
Taking that logic one step further, VG Media has now decided to (and I'm not making this up) grant Google a "free license" to let Google use the snippets. This whole thing was about money in the first place, and now VG Media isn't getting any money... and it looks ridiculous and foolish for having tried this in the first place. The end result is the same: snippets are in Google News, VG Media publications are getting traffic, but VG Media has made itself look silly.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: germany, google news, snippets
Companies: google, vg media
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Don't do it, Google!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Don't do it, Google!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Don't do it, Google!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Don't do it, Google!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Don't do it, Google!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's what I'd do if I were VG Media.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They wanted not only to get free advertising for their product but to actually get paid for getting free advertisement for their product
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Forcing Google to pay you for something that they pay no-one else for sounds alot more like blackmail than Google deciding the price of your information is too much for their use of it.
Sheesh, it's like they some horrid hybrid of the "boy who cried wolf" and "wolf in sheeps clothing": "The wolf in boys clothing who cried wolf"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The story so far...
"Alright, well, we don't feel like paying you for them, so we'll just remove them shall we?"
"That's blackmail!"
(5-minutes later, after looking at the projected drop in traffic)
"Hey, Google my friend, out of the kindness of our hearts, we've decided to grant you a free liscense to include those snippets, so why don't you be a pall and put those back in, yes?"
I must say, as far as ways to get themselves out of the hole they dug, this one at least works decently, though they've still got to deal with all the egg on their face over their actions.
Google should take them up on the offer, while making it abundantly clear that they still don't believe it's needed, as well as stating that if the 'license'(basically an agreement not to bring legal action) is ever revoked, the snippets will once more be removed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
But they do. They created a special law for that, the LSR which translates to something like Accomplishment Protection Law. That law says that small parts of an article (length isnt defined in the law, 3words? 5 words? a sentence? who knows!) are protected for one year after their first publication. So if Google would use them it would be a copyright violation and because of that they do need a free licence/permission.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If Google refuses the license and points out how VG Media's failure to understand how the internet and search engines work is the problem, it'll solve the problems it's having with the same issues in other countries. This unwarranted rent-seeking has got to stop.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Silly"
"Silly" is such an inadequate word.
I might have gone with "incredibly shortsighted, greedy jackasses"... but that's just me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google did it wrong !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Google did it wrong !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
VG Media you are bad and you should feel bad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
i.e. let's assume you want to create a site in German that talks about news articles and you take a small quotes from articles to make fun of them. Also because you want to cover the server cost you put a small ad on it or something that generates a bit of income.
Now because of that great new law that isn't used for what it was intended for the newspaper or whoever owns the article you quoted can sue you for money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
No, I imagine it's being used exactly for what it was intended for.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Statutory loophole
If this understanding of the law and lawmakers' intentions is accurate (and I doubt that it is), it looks like a classic example of a statutory loophole and a declared intention of wanting to exploit it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Statutory loophole
Most people see this as a planned step in framing Google yet again as a dangerous monopoly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Statutory loophole
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Statutory loophole
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just say no.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Free license
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let 'Em Die
1) Google is stealing our content - we demand to be paid.
2) Google has stopped stealing our content - that's blackmail.
3) We have to let Google steal our content or go out of business.
Coming soon:
4) We are lying, thieving morons - stop laughing at us.
I'd like to see Google release a statement reporting their cessation of all links to VGM content, i.e., no links either from news snippets or search results for content - not even headlines - originating in domains of VGM members, with the explanation that the law is too vague about what is allowed. Google should make clear that it will not tolerate being described as an extortionistic monopoly, and has elected not to accept special license from VGM under the cloud of such characterization, since such acceptance would appear to affirm both extortion and monopolism at the expense of the rights of other Internet entities.
This has the dual virtues of strangling VGM's free advertising and Internet existence to death and forcing clarification of the law.
Finally, I'd hope that Google would return VGM to its news and search results ONLY if and when the law was clarified in a way that allows Google and everyone else to use snippets in the fashion Google had originally been doing without need of "license" from VGM.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]