No Surprise: Rightscorp Already Abusing Canada's Notice & Notice System To Send Bogus Shakedown Letters
from the why-not dept
While Canada's new notice and notice copyright notification system has some problems, it's significantly better than almost every other attempt to do something similar. Of course, that doesn't mean it won't be abused, and apparently the first company to rush bumbling through the "abuse" door would be none other than Rightscorp, the copyright trolling operation that is no stranger to questionable practices and legal interpretations.Michael Geist has the details of a totally bogus "notice" that Rightscorp has been sending to Canadian users via the new system. Geist does a nice job highlighting all the "mistakes" with Rightscorp's letter:
The notice falsely warns that the recipient could be liable for up to $150,000 per infringement when the reality is that Canadian law caps liability for non-commercial infringement at $5,000 for all infringements. The notice also warns that the user’s Internet service could be suspended, yet there is no such provision under Canadian law. Moreover, given the existence of the private copying system (which features levies on blank media such as CDs), personal music downloads may qualify as private copying and therefore be legal in Canada.From the actual letter itself, it's pretty clear that Rightscorp is just sending an identical version of the letter it sends in the US to ISPs hoping they'll pass it on to the customer (most don't). It even cites US copyright law, rather than Canadian code. And that $150,000 number is the US statutory maximum (and even that's misleading, but that's another post for another time).
In addition to misstating Canadian law, the notice is instructive for what it does not say. While a recipient might fear a lawsuit with huge liability, there is very little likelihood of a lawsuit given that Rightscorp and BMG do not have the personal information of the subscriber. To obtain that information, they would need a court order, which can be a very expensive proposition. Moreover, this is merely an allegation that would need to be proven in court (assuming the rights holder is able to obtain a court order for the subscriber information).
Of course, Rightscorp doesn't care. It's not interested in going to court. Its entire business model is based on volume: specifically scaring enough people to "pay up" to avoid a lawsuit that wouldn't be coming in the first place. So what does it care? Under Canadian law, ISPs will pass along the notification, and Rightscorp can cite laws from the US, Canada or Sudan for all it cares about the actual law. All it wants is to frighten people into paying, even if its legal arguments are completely nonsensical.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: canada, copyright trolling, notice and notice, takedowns
Companies: bmg, rightscorp
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Canada maintains its niceness by removing folks like Justin Bieber and Ted Cruz, like an immune system.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
This being Canuckistan, we have Crown Prosecutors here I believe, and a judiciary which is quite likely to tell the gov't to go piss up a rope when the latter are acting like asses. Cf. medical marijuana growers.
I suspect the various law societies will be interested in weighing in here too. Bad enough that the US legal system looks like it does. We won't let !@#$ like that fly in Canada.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But nope, who cares about the public and protecting them from extortionists, gotta protect that imaginary property! /s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Pay no attention to the millions being stolen from other business models having to kowtow to the demands of these special creatures who have paid more for their government representation that everyone else.
Copyright, so important that everyone else has to pay to protect it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.michaelgeist.ca/2015/01/canadian-isps-responding-copyright-notices-adding-inform ation-notice-system-privacy-concerns/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Canadian Government Stepping In
Thought you'd be interested in knowing that Rightscorp is now in hot water with the Canadian government. Apparently, the government is saying they want to put a stop to this: http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/thomson-reuters/150109/stop-threats-canadas-online-pirates-r ights-holders-told
At least something positive is starting to come out of this story - at least on the surface anyway.
- IceCube / Drew Wilson
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Canadian Government Stepping In
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Canadian Government Stepping In
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Canadian Government Stepping In
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In not even a week after this law came into place, Rightscorp has managed to get the MP's in parliament to demand Canadian ISP's tell their customers when sending these notices to their subscribers that no identifying subscriber information was handed to the trolls in conjunction with the notice being sent to them.
I know Rightscorp is hard up for cash due to their low stock price, but it sure does paint a picture of how lazy these clowns are that they try and use U.S. copyright law to Canadian ISP customers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That is fairly stunningly incompetent, to not even bother to sanity check what you're sending out to capitalize on a new feature of the law, in another country. "Er, who are these guys?!?"
Or did they think Canada was just another state in the empire between DC and Alaska and Guam and Japan?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
... well, unless you just use the exact same letter, even if the laws between countries are massively different.
And sending out all those extortion letters, carefully making sure you choose only the truly guilty, that takes a lot of work!
... well, unless you don't care one bit about 'guilty or innocent', and just send them out randomly to as many people as you can get email addresses(or in the case of Canada, IP addresses) to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]