And Of Course DEA Had Its Own Database Of Metadata On All Calls From Inside The US To Certain Foreign Countries
from the because-of-course-it-did dept
It's both interesting and troubling to see just how frequently the DEA keeps popping up in various stories about the intelligence community and surveillance. We've written about how the DEA was getting classified information and then trained to "launder" the details of how it got it via parallel construction, how it had "embedded" AT&T employees who could help the DEA look up any info it needed and how it had its own HEMISPHERE database of call record info going back to 1987.But it wasn't entirely clear how much information was in that database. And yet, in a recently revealed declaration from a DEA agent, it was revealed that the DEA had a database on every phone call from inside the US to certain countries outside the US, which it could then query using the typical RAS -- "reasonable articulable suspicion" -- standard that the NSA has used to query its giant database as well. That is, rather than targeting just suspicious calls, the DEA got a database of all calls to certain key countries.
This database [REDACTED] consisted of telecommunications metadata obtained from United States telecommunications service providers pursuant to administrative subpoenas served upon the service providers under the provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 876. This metadata related to international telephone calls originating in the United States and calling [REDACTED] designated foreign countries, one of which was Iran, that were determined to have demonstrated a nexus to international drug trafficking and related criminal activities. This metadata consisted exclusively of the initiating telephone number; the receiving telephone number; the date, time, and duration of the call; and the method by which the call was billed.The program was shut down in September of 2013, just as the NY Times wrote about the program (funny, that...). As Marcy Wheeler notes, there's at least a decent chance this effort was just about trying to support sanctions against Iran (tracking if someone in the US is actually doing business with Iran) rather than drug trafficking. Either way, it shows yet another example of how much the government seems willing to scoop up tons of information on innocent people in hopes that there's a needle in all those stacks of hay.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: dea, metadata, surveillance
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Seems the entire system is corrupted, from those that introduce these ideas to useless judges that find ways to justify them. Occasionally holding up a righteous act as proof everything is fine for a public determined to stay in denial.
I don't respect the DEA or the "laws" that allow it to continue it's needless criminal activity. They, along with so many others, simply need to go. I'm not concerned with "blue lives" nearly as much as I am with my country's freedoms.
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Another aspect that is not nearly enough reported on......like what can they do/use with this......when everyone is required by many to provide accurate non negotible discretional information under threat of.........im not saying its bad, im saying its perfect for abuse, .........well, not bad as long as only the bare minimum information is required for a sucessfull transaction, and not a conditioned acceptance that they can demand any information under threat of law that has no use in the purpose of a transaction...........
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Government types have this strange mentality that if you don't hit the budget cap, then they are giving you to much money & cut it back.
How many of those running these different departments are just sucking up everything they can remotely justify to make sure they get more in the next funding round. Collecting & storing all of this data is a great way to burn cash. Trot out 1 or 2 needles that fell into your lap in a press conference and the powers that be oooh and ahhh and sign off on the next years larger budget & expansion of powers.
As we saw in the coverage of Palintar (sp) they tools they developed in house to search & sift the haystacks suck so badly that they have to pull in an outside contractor to help look for the needles.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Seems the entire system is corrupted, from those that introduce these ideas to useless judges that find ways to justify them. Occasionally holding up a righteous act as proof everything is fine for a public determined to stay in denial.
I don't respect the DEA or the "laws" that allow it to continue it's needless criminal activity. They, along with so many others, simply need to go. I'm not concerned with "blue lives" nearly as much as I am with my country's freedoms.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Government waste
I mean, how many copies are there? NSA, CIA, DEA, FBI, DOJ, DIA, DHS, Secret Service, NYPD,...there's got to be thousands of copies of this data. Because everyone's gotta have it and none of them will share.
Talk about your waste, fraud and abuse.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
The haystack overdose is keeping the whole system from achieving anything but a violation of the constitution, without any return value apart from illegal blackmail material.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And reopened with a different name and more secrecy. Probably.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Now this makes me thing what other US. government agencies have a database like this? We know the NSA does, I would bet the CIA and FBI have one as well.
The other thing I would like to know is how long have the had it and how are they hiding the funding for it? I have never seen mention of this in any budget that is set for the DEA.
The fact that it does not come up in any budget documents means it's is either blended in with some other item or there is a separate fund set up.
The other thing that I am wondering is how they got the authorization to collect and retain this data on an ongoing basis?
I highly doubt a court allowed them to collect and retain data indefinitely.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Broadband backwater
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Broadband backwater
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Not to mention those "programs" that have an automatic name change set to occur periodically.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
We hold these truths to be self-evident. .
List any of the objective's of the war on drugs, that has been successfully achieved? List any other positive effect on society, as a whole, that directly resulted from the war on drugs??
Now do that same thing for failed objectives and negative effects!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: We hold these truths to be self-evident. .
A massive amount of money has been successfully diverted to large corporations and shady government agencies.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: We hold these truths to be self-evident. .
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And then the program was promptly reopened under a different name, or using another agency's existing program.
They twist words until words no longer have any meaning. Never forget that fact.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Fixing a small typo...
Ummm... shouldn't that read:
The program was renamed and its operation center relocated in September of 2013, just as the NY Times wrote about the program...
These programs never actually end. They just get hidden in another layer of secrecy.
---
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: We hold these truths to be self-evident. .
" A massive amount of money has been successfully diverted to large corporations and shady government agencies."
Proving that the "War On" Drugs has been and remains a tremendous success and that the "War On" process can be used for almost anything, from Terrorism to Poverty, to generate huge amounts of accountability-free revenue while having absolutely no real effect upon the particular subject of that particular "War On".
A near perfect business plan.
----
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]