Internet Comes Through For Developer Of Key Email Encryption Tool
from the reasons-we-love-the-internet dept
Yesterday, we reposted Julia Angwin's article from ProPublica about how the guy behind GPG, a key tool for email encryption, Werner Koch, was basically broke, and that attempts to crowdfund money to keep going hadn't been all that successful. The story seemed to resonate with lots of people, and the donations started flowing. After getting a grand total of just about €34,000 in 2014, he's already well over €100,000 this year, with most of that coming yesterday after Angwin's story went up. On top of that, Stripe and Facebook each agreed to fund him to the tune of $50,000 per year (from each of them, so $100k total), and the Linux Foundation had agreed to give him $60k (though, Koch admits that the deal there was actually signed last week).Either way, this is great to see, though it's unfortunate that it had to wait until an article detailing his plight came out. We've seen this sort of thing a few times now, such as when the Heartbleed bug made everyone realize that OpenSSL was basically supported by volunteers with almost no budget at all. Thankfully, the attention there got the project necessary funds to continue to keep us safe.
It really is quite incredible when you realize how much of the internet that you rely on is built by people out of a true labor of love. Often, people have no idea that there even is an opportunity to support those projects, and it's great that Angwin was able to highlight this one and get it the necessary funding to keep moving forward.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: crowdfunding, encryption, gpg, privacy, security, support, werner kock
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
This is, in my opinion, the core of what is needed to be a successful entrepreneur: have a solid understanding of what you suck at, and partner with others who can cover your weaknesses.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
encryption yet allowed to copy your mail
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: encryption yet allowed to copy your mail
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: encryption yet allowed to copy your mail
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: encryption yet allowed to copy your mail
That being said, I think the idea of PGP in email is hopeless, because it requires both sides to download the software, share keys (even on a server). For email encryption/protection, instead I rely on https://burner.link/ That sucker only requires me to follow the API. The other side gets a dumb link, such that the attachment isn't sent unencrypted from email server to server. A couple of years back, I asked my tax prep people if they had pgp, so I could email them my documents--and their eyes glazed over. This year, they get a email with a link to the file download.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: encryption yet allowed to copy your mail
to borrow from a related saying, you can have privacy, or you can have convenience. If one end demands convenience, then privacy is compromised.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: encryption yet allowed to copy your mail
The govt might keep the encrypted data, but only attempt cracking data they really need access to because the resources to crack all of it is too great.
This is much more private than the current situation of send everything in plain text.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: encryption yet allowed to copy your mail
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: encryption yet allowed to copy your mail
uh oh, better go kill yourself now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: encryption yet allowed to copy your mail
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
People of New York, too...
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/can-done-everywhere-principal-inspired-1-1-million-fundrais er/
A random boy on the streets of New York was asked "who has influence you the most?" His answer led to further posts then $1M-plus of donations to the school, the principal appears on Ellen DeGeneres Show, a visit to the White House... all from a simple blog post.
It's the classic "if everyone gave me a dollar" scenario, spread across a world of 7 billion people. I'm glad to see Mr. Koch finally reaping the rewards of his dedication too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: People of New York, too...
The contrapositive to that is if a rich person gave everyone needing money a dollar he would be in debt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Personally, I had never heard of him or knew anything about the situation. The article is what tipped me off. We need more articles like this...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Maybe a better way to put it would have been, "Unfortunately people didn't know about the problem, but fortunately they do now because some cared enough to write an article about it."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Back at ya! WTF does your four chars add to the discussion?!? WTF are you complaining about exactly?!? I agree with him (ahow628). There are so many unsung heroes in FLOSS diligently banging their heads on problems that interest them yet not bothering to toot their horns, it's impossible to know which ones have fallen into funding cracks. How are we supposed to keep up with them all if they can't/won't market themselves?
Next time, please don't waste our time!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's always been this way
Nearly everything of value on the Internet was built exactly that way. While a few fortunate people have been funded here and there, the majority of formats, standards, protocols and software packages have been put together by people who simply wanted to create something useful and to contribute to the ecosystem. They didn't do it to get rich, or famous, or popular, or anything other than because they perceived a need and tried to satisfy it.
The people who should be funding this work -- to the tune of billions, not thousands -- are those who have enjoyed incredible financial success as a result of the foundation laid years or decades ago by others. $50K is nice, but it's not even chump change compared to their quarterly profits -- and when assessed in view of the fact that they would not exist as companies were it not for the work of thousands who came before them -- some of whom are still contributing today.
What this story (and the story of OpenSSL) highlight, is that those laboring in obscurity on critical pieces of Internet infrastructure have had to get by with scraps from the table, while those who've built empires on their work dine magnificently -- and then pretend to be surprised that others are nearly starving. That's wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's always been this way
This can't be overstated, and is why I get a bit flustered when the big internet ad agencies keep saying things like "without advertising, the internet couldn't run". The internet as a profit center is a recent phenomenon, and one that is very much a mixed bag. Almost all of the things that make the internet useful and wonderful (excluding the physical infrastructure) have been produced without an expectation of profit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It's always been this way
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It's always been this way
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: It's always been this way
The extra sad thing about it is that it doesn't have to be that way. It is completely possible to do internet advertising in a way that isn't so abusive. Techdirt regularly demonstrates a couple of those ways, even.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: It's always been this way
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: It's always been this way
This is pretty much my stance, too. In a sense, it would make internet advertising little different than most other forms of advertising: annoying, but tolerable -- but that would be an improvement over what it is right now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: It's always been this way
Not just advertisers but web admins and designers as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Internet 1 Stalkers 0
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I've come to the conclusion after heartbleed (and this confirms it) that companies that choose a FLOSS project instead of a costly proprietary one should take some of the money that would have gone to licensing and donate it to the FLOSS project.
OpenSSL is a particular sore spot for me as I know that a lot of companies devoted huge amounts of developer resources to their own proprietary fork, and spent another ton of money to get their own fork FIPS certified so they could use it in their products. Over and over and over again these companies redo the same damn work (as a group and individually when they went through the same process for a newer version of OpenSSL) and very little of it (if any) made it back to the project or developers in terms of code or money.
This seems to stem from a the entitlement culture - the grand daddy of the permission culture - that tries to claim "ownership" of every scrap of "intellectual property".
I am glad this has a happy continuation, but I can't help but wonder what are we overlooking? What other FLOSS projects out there are critical to the internet ecosystem, and what are their needs?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
OpenBSD is perennially short on funds. Many of their developers are poor and from third world nations and the project needs money to get them to hackathons, which it would be impossible for themselves to fund.
At the least, buy a dvd or T-shirt if that's all you can do. The same is true of many distros and projects. Which ones do you rely on? Research!
I'd also like to buy a TD T-shirt when I have the money to spare, just to thank Mike for all his work and for letting me say this. :-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You misspelled The War on Drugs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
a good webmail
[ link to this | view in chronology ]