Nintendo Plans For The Future By Pretending All Of Our Smart Phones Aren't Great Handheld Gaming Devices

Once More With Feeling: Patent Reform Introduced, And This Time The Trial Lawyers May Not Be Able To Kill It

from the will-it-make-a-difference dept

Fri, Feb 6th 2015 3:39pm — Mike Masnick

This was widely expected, but Rep. Goodlatte has now officially re-introduced his patent reform bill, which largely mirrors the one that sailed through the House with ease a little over a year ago (in part because they took out some of the key parts). The Senate bill was a bit stronger and was on the verge of passing until the trial lawyers called up Senator Harry Reid, and had him flat out kill the bill, despite widespread bipartisan support. As we noted at the time, it seemed like the trial lawyers may have miscalculated, because it was already clear that the Republicans were likely to gain control over the Senate in the 2014 elections (as they did), and they were not interested in bowing down to the trial lawyers.

Hopefully that means that a decent patent reform bill will actually make it through Congress this time around, but it still seems likely that, while it may help around the edges, the final bill probably won't be strong enough to fully solve the problems. Still, it's a good step forward, and at the very least, in clearing out some of the problems with the current system (often highlighted via trollish behavior) it will shine the light on remaining problems in the system.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: congress, patent reform, patent trolls, patents

17 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 6 Feb 2015 @ 4:30pm

Patron Saint of No
The Patron Saint of No can't kill this bill anymore. Follow the money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Feb 2015 @ 4:34pm

Microsoft and IBM convinced Goodlatte to give up on the business method patent reform. But didn't the Supreme Court essentially kill that type of patents in the Alice ruling? So why wouldn't the Republicans reintroduce that into law now? Doesn't Congress follow Supreme Court's rulings?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 6 Feb 2015 @ 4:43pm
  
  Re:
  If congress makes a law and it is not found unconstitutional nor illegal, the SCOUS is bound to follow the law made.
  
  Many, many, times you will hear courts say that it is not up to them to write the laws, merely to enforce what is.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Feb 2015 @ 4:39pm

Patent Abolition
The only real reform required to the patent system is to abolish it altogether. It is kept alive by various bad actors, such as patent lawyers and the pharmaceutical industry. The patent trolls are the patent lawyers in disguise. The intellectual justification for the patent system is based on the myth of inventors surviving on their licensing revenue. Such inventors are an extinct species, so no economic loss would be incurred by failing to provide them with a government-granted monopoly. How many papers do economists have to publish showing that the cost of the patent system far exceeds its benefits? The patent system kills start-ups at their most vulnerable time. Over 99% of all patents are junk patents. Politicians are always claiming they are about "jobs, jobs, jobs", but they never fix the huge job-killing mess that is the patent system.

If the cost of something exceeds its benefits, then do not do it. Just stop it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 6 Feb 2015 @ 4:40pm
  
  Re: Patent Abolition
  Yes but that would require a constitutional amendment. Good luck with that.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Aaron Wolf (profile), 7 Feb 2015 @ 12:08am
    
    Re: Re: Patent Abolition
    Patent Abolition would *not* require a constitutional amendment. The constitution does *not* mandate that we have patent law, it merely *permits* congress to enact it. It's not required. So it could be abolished with a simple law.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- dae, 7 Feb 2015 @ 2:55am
  
  Re: Patent Abolition
  this may not be suprising but I'm a Small d democrat who LIKES trial lawyers for the most part See: Here: http://www.salon.com/2004/07/13/lawyers_3/
  
  what happened to Valerie Lakey was Terrible and if it hadn't been for John Edwards the Corporations who made those pool drains would have had NO incentive to clean up their Act but as far as Patents are concerned I agree with you whole heartedly and I'm tired of Libertarians on the matter because too many of them are too scared shitless to do the only Decent thing and Abolish the Entire !@#$ING patent system. Just. Kill. It. That's the only real Reform. Ideas should be free.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Seegras (profile), 12 Feb 2015 @ 3:03am
    
    Re: Re: Patent Abolition
    Uhm, I think the Libertarian position on patents must be to abolish them.
    
    They're monopolies given by the state that allow the holder to tell you what you can't do with your property.
    
    There's just no way you can support any patent-system and claim you're a libertarian.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
madasahatter (profile), 6 Feb 2015 @ 5:01pm

The Constitution allows Congress to enact or not enact both patent and copyright legislation. The requirement is that both are for the advancement of the arts and technology.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 6 Feb 2015 @ 6:13pm
  
  Re:
  In constitutional language, copyrights are associated with "science" and patents are associated with "useful arts".
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Aaron Wolf (profile), 7 Feb 2015 @ 12:09am
    
    Re: Re:
    Where do you get that interpretation?? There's nothing clear about the constitution in terms of which law refers to which part of the Progress clause…
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 7 Feb 2015 @ 9:20pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      From being a student of US and international legal history, reading the Federalist Papers, reading the writings of luminaries such as Madison and Jefferson, studying innumerable treatises and published research, studying court decisions, and a middling familiarity with rules of grammar. FYI, at the time the Copyright Act of 1790 was enacted, the term "science"" was used I reference to "knowledge/learning" and "progress" was a reference to the encouragement of such knowledge/learning. When the federalist papers first reported debates associated with what became Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8, the debates centered around the encouragement of science by the grant of certain rights to authors by the federal government (at the time such rights were conferred by states with the encouragement of Congress during the period of time associated with the Articles of Confederation). Only later did the grant of right to inventors in association with the useful arts enter into the debate.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Prisoner 201, 9 Feb 2015 @ 6:34am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Invention is a very useful art.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
got_runs? (profile), 7 Feb 2015 @ 8:44am

>_
The Repubs will put a poison pill in it. They just can't help themselves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 7 Feb 2015 @ 4:32pm

Nice catch Mike
Nice catch, this one went by me. The truth is, until all software patents are banned outright none of us are safe from commons-destroying litigation. I wonder if there is a good resource that lays out what different nation's sw patent laws are, similar to the maps of data-mining privacy laws that are out there.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Pragmatic, 9 Feb 2015 @ 6:45am
  
  Re: Nice catch Mike
  [Sad but true]
  
  Until "the tragedy of the commons" means, once again, that selfish greed is a bad, bad thing, nothing is going to change.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
nasch (profile), 10 Feb 2015 @ 1:56pm

Worse than nothing?
Still, it's a good step forward, and at the very least, in clearing out some of the problems with the current system (often highlighted via trollish behavior) it will shine the light on remaining problems in the system.

Isn't it possible this will lead Congress to believe they've "fixed it" and now we won't get a real reform bill for a long time?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]