DOJ Invites The ATF To The War On Drugs, Grants It Power To Process Its Own 'Drug-Related' Forfeitures
from the pervs-and-their-incentives dept
If you love our nation's stupid Drug War and our government's legalized theft system d/b/a asset forfeiture… well, it's highly unlikely that you read this blog with any regularity. If you don't like either of those, then here's more bad news for you.
The ATF -- another rogue DOJ agency and one which was previously only adjacent to the Drug War -- has been formally invited by the DOJ to jump in and start seizing more stuff. The initial dip of the ATF's toe into drug-related administrative forfeiture has been such a moneymaker that the DOJ is permanently removing the only barrier between the ATF and warehouses full of other people's property.
In February 2013, the Department of Justice started a pilot program allowing the ATF to process property related to drug offenses through administrative forfeiture, when weapons were also being seized. By Sept. 30, 2014, the ATF had seized and processed assets with a total value in excess of $19,300,000, according to the new rule.The only thing holding the ATF back from being a full-blown soldier in the War on Drugs was paperwork and logistics. Formerly, if it seized something purportedly "drug-related," it had to turn it over to the DEA or a US Attorney for processing -- the latter option usually resulting in a trip through the court system. No longer. Now, it can handle forfeitures from start-to-finish.
The program will continue, according to the Justice Department.
This speeds things up for the US government, which still strongly feels (despite Eric Holder's recent rule tweak) that taking stuff from people under the assumption that the stuff itself is guilty of criminal activity is a great way to destroy drug empires, punish fraudsters and generally wreak law enforcement havoc on criminal enterprises. For the people on the other end of these "forfeitures" -- the only party saddled with the burden of proof -- it often looks like nothing more than government-ordained robbery.
According to the DOJ, "fast and effective" is better than "right."
Administrative forfeiture is expedient and effective, the Justice Department believes.The DOJ notes, rather disingenuously, that all the legal hassle of disputed forfeitures is "costing" it thousands of dollars every year. Hence, it would prefer that its agencies be allowed to process their own administrative forfeitures, increasing the likelihood that
An uncontested administrative forfeiture can be done in 60-90 days for minimal cost, whereas judicial forfeiture generally can take 6 months to a year and cost hundreds or thousands of dollars. In the meantime, the government incurs additional costs if the property requires storage or maintenance until a final order of forfeiture can be obtained, the rule states.Now, some entities (like the DOJ and its various three-letter underlings) believe that an "uncontested" forfeiture is a tacit admission of guilt. It's a stupid assumption but it probably lets them sleep better at night. In reality, an "uncontested" seizure is usually the result of a person realizing that an uphill court battle, multiple powerful government agencies and a massive amount of legal fees stand between them and their seized property. In most cases, it isn't worth the fight.
This policy change perverts the ATF's incentives, pretty much ensuring that the process will be abused (further) in the future. Anything that speeds up a corrupt and broken process will work out badly for those on the receiving end of the ATF's new powers. The further muddying of the lines separating agencies' jurisdictions will only make things worse, turning the ATF into a part-time Drug War ally who will now be looking for anything that might be "drug-related," rather than limiting itself to its designated duties.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: asset forfeitures, atf, doj
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
"Department of Justice". We really need to rename that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
executive signing statements (much less SECRET ONES?), um, where is that even HINTED at in the constitution ? ? ?
(i have never heard an explanation)
unreasonable search and seizure ? ? ? NO SUCH THING anymore...
right to face your accuser ? ? ? fuggidaboutit, secret metadata in a black data center is your judge, jury and executioner...
right to a fair trial ? ? ? effectively obviated by persecutor/prosecutor abuse which tacks on a million felonies to smother you... 'cop a plea for something you didn't do, or we'll railroad you to a million years in prison...'
this ain't America, this ain't constitutional, this ain't legal, but it doesn't fucking matter does it... its golden rule time: them that's got the gold, makes the rules...
suffer peons, and suffer in silence, we don't want to hear you bleating, or you'll get a beating...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In fairness to ATF
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: In fairness to ATF
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Land of the free" my ass. That became a joke a long time ago.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You can be tricked into thinking you are free, though, which a lot of people are.
You don't even own your house/property if you don't "pay" the government. You have never been free and never will be, in any "country."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Makes perfect sense...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Makes perfect sense...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Makes perfect sense...
/s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Makes perfect sense...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Makes perfect sense...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Makes perfect sense...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Makes perfect sense...
The IRS already has that power. In fact, the IRS is the most powerful law enforcement agency in the US and has a number of capabilities that the other agencies can only dream about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Makes perfect sense...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Makes perfect sense...
Just doing their job... right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Makes perfect sense...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Makes perfect sense...
True. They have to make up a tax-related crime. And actually, they don't even have to do that. They just have to say they're pretty sure that you're about to flee to escape some tax-related crime.
And remember, the IRS has their own court system. They don't have to prove anything in a real court, they get to go to courts that they run.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thank you.
Note: The DOJ would like to thank the MPAA and RIAA for referring us to some great accounting firms.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You say that as if the ATF hasn't always had perverted incentives.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How quickly people forget...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/06/21/what-is-operation-fast-and-furious-11-quest ions-answers.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 5th, 2015 @ 2:58pm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The "war on guns"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The "war on guns"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]