BART, The Train Service, Goes After Brewery Over BART, The Beer
from the paging-bart-the-simpson dept
Maybe, like me, you thought that the Bay Area Rapid Transit system was only good for illegally shutting down cell phone services in its stations to quiet protests that never actually existed. Well, it turns out we were all wrong about that. BART is also good for insanely stupid trademark oppositions. Take, for instance, the recent dispute between the transit group and FiftyFifty Brewing Company, in which the former is attempting to keep the latter from gaining a trademark on its Barrel Aged Really Tasty brew.
According to FiftyFifty owner/CEO Andy Barr, the B.A.R.T. beer has been a regular offering for several years. It has been sold at the brewery and bottled in limited production for California distribution; he has legal label approval in the state. But FiftyFifty is now ready to expand its current production (~1200 barrels per year) and start shipping over state lines, so as Barr puts it, “it was a time for a trademark.” However, one party is not so keen on FiftyFifty’s trademark application for the B.A.R.T. label: Bay Area Rapid Transit, which obviously shares an acronym with the FiftyFifty beer in question. An opposition was filed.No, it certainly isn't true. Barr further explains that the acronym was devised as an homage to a dead dog that, when alive, used to run around the brewery plant and entertain the workers within it. Now, I'm not saying that trying to co-opt the intention to name a product after a beloved pooch necessarily makes BART an entity very likely run by Satan himself, but it sure doesn't help to disavow the notion, does it?
“We were very surprised to get opposition from Bay Area Rapid Transit,” says Barr, pointing out that trains and beer are very different things, unlikely to cause consumer confusion. “Trademarks are for specific categories. You trademark it for beer, ale, porter. The implication is that we came up with that acronym in order to monetize on the fame of Bay Area Rapid Transit — which is not true,” Barr says.
More important is Barr's correct explanation of how trademarks work and within what parameters they operate. One of the key aspects of a valid trademark is the narrow industry to which it applies. BART, for instance, has a trademark on "BART" for the industries of transit, prints, and publication. I would have to be very drunk to confuse a train with a beer, I think. One would think that this entire opposition must be some kind of mistake, except the BART officials commenting on it think they're barking up a perfectly valid tree.
“Just as any agency or business does, BART routinely protects its name and registered trademarks,” notes Alicia Trost, Communications Department Manager for the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District. “Use of the BART name by unauthorized parties for commercial gain, whether or not they are in the rapid transit business, is a violation of trademark law, and something BART must protect itself against.”Except, of course, that because we're talking about completely different industries, and because the source of the BART beer name had nothing to do with the BART transit group, none of the above is correct. No protection is necessary at all. Having a communications person publicly comment that the competitive industry doesn't factor into the validity of a trademark claim, which is absolutely false, seems like a huge misstep. Unfortunately, even though Barr knows he and FiftyFifty are in the right, he's facing the realities of our wonderful legal system.
“It blows me away that it would degrade and demean anyone else’s brand value,” he continues, expressing concern about the next steps. “We’re not a deep-pocketed organization … So, the question is how do we stand up for ourselves?”Here's hoping David doesn't fall to Goliath.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: andy barr, barrel aged really tasty, bart, beer, trademark
Companies: bart, fiftyfifty
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Hmm... Not sure I'm buying the story. Sounds like a bacronym.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe they have a point....
Or lost people walking into pubs asking directions to the nearest Bay area station and being handed beers instead...
I can see where the confusion will come in...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Maybe they have a point....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hopefully the right thing will happen without more being spent on lawyers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BART huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: BART huh?
Maybe the beer company should ask Fox for some legal support since Bart Simpson may be BART's next target of a lawsuit. After all, there's TONS of merchandise with Bart Simpson's name on it.
Maybe people have been thinking "Bart Simpson" is actually "BART Simpson", a stealth way to market the train service!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: BART huh?
This has been done before.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As there are many municipalities across the country that refer to themselves as "Bay Area" -- I propose a name change to the less ambiguous Francisco Area Rapid Transit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: eol on Mar 24th, 2015 @ 12:14am
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"Hate to tell you this, Peter, but FOX News called. They own the copyright to Hitler's likeness and have filed a cease-and-desist order. They don't want you defaming his character -- by making him out to be a pothead."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
that is the thing that the other BAT is hoping for and that the brewer will fold because it cant afford the litigation. perhaps a copyright/patent law firm will take the case on a 'no win, no fee' basis?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
After a few too many...
Or you'd have to be a moron if you used a BART train when you were in a hurry?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Another beer piece. Seems to be a focus.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Definetly infrigning
I think I'll name mine Greyhound...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Definetly infrigning
Introducing, from the venerable Dark Helmet Brewing Company, our Suburban Express IPA!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Definetly infrigning
But that by itself doesn't make it a trademark infringement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Definetly infrigning
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
worse things than lawsuit....
thrown face down
and shot in the back
....thought it was a taser.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Too much time on their hands
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Coors Light Love Train
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Funding
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]