Defense Department Keeps Losing 'Sensitive' Explosives Gear, Then Finding It For Sale On Ebay
from the Finders-v.-Keepers-comes-into-play-here,-but-with-international-ramifications dept
The Pentagon may not know where some very sensitive equipment has disappeared to, but a variety of private resellers seem to have some idea where it might be found. A leaked US Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS) document obtained by The Intercept details the agency's inability to keep track of its explosives-detecting equipment, bequeathed to it by the Defense Department's Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization (JIEDDO).
While it did manage to track down some of its missing equipment at various equipment resellers (the document lists a variety of URLs, including ebay.com and craigslist.org), it still has no idea how much of it is still in the military's possession.
In all, more than 32,000 pieces of equipment were issued. Some kits are still in use, making it difficult to compile a precise inventory of what was issued and what might be missing.The March 2014 document asks for assistance in locating missing devices to prevent them from being used against the US and its allies. It also points out that the failure to keep tabs on this equipment is mostly internal.
These investigations also determined the loss and theft of advanced technologies intended to give US military personnel tactical advantage on the battlefield was due to poor accountability controls by many of the military units who were issued the gear.The Intercept managed to track down two eBay listings for NCIS equipment -- one from December of last year and an active listing for a CNVD-T Clip-On Night Vision Device Thermal System. For only $16,599, this equipment can be yours.... (Update: For what it's worth, the ebay seller featured below got in touch to insist that he is a licensed dealer of these items from the manufacturer, and that it's perfectly legal to sell these items).
JIEDDO has been heavily criticized over the years for expending large sums of money without attaining clear results. According to a 2012 report by the Government Accountability Office, JIEDDO had spent over $18 billion yet lacked an effective way to oversee its programs.And as is so often the case when the government finds new ways to hand out military gear, those receiving the handouts seem alarmingly unconcerned with keeping close tabs on the equipment's whereabouts. Last year, another Pentagon-related equipment dispersal program caught heat for its lousy inventory control systems. The 1033 program, which hands out military equipment and weapons to local law enforcement agencies, is decentralized and disorganized, leading to 184 law enforcement agencies losing their access to militarization toys for misplacing everything from several assault rifles to an entire Humvee.
So, the Department of Defense may do several things well, but ensuring sensitive/powerful military gear remains in its control -- rather than in the hands of enemies or eBay users -- isn't one of them.
And, of course, the NCIS has refused to comment on the leaked document and has yet to make a bid it can neither confirm nor deny on its former property. If you're so inclined, you can always contact the not-quite-redacted Steve Sheldon, Intelligence Specialist (NCIS Southwest Field Office) at (619) 556-1106 and inquire as to whether ~$17,000 is a fair price for a "like new" clip-on night vision scope.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: defense department, explosives, internet, jieddo, lost gear, ncis
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
( •_•)>⌐■-■
(⌐■_■)
The incompetence. It's blinding.
They can start bu getting warrants (or not) and 'buy' the equipment to get to the source and 'gently ask' where did it come from to get to the root of the equipment 'leakage'.
That said... I would love to buy those night vision equipment alright.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tell a woman that her man is cheating on her and with one of those pieces of equipment and she will have found every one of them by lunch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Status Quo
Can anyone name any governmental organization anywhere that does not fit this description?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Status Quo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Potentially misleading...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Potentially misleading...
http://www.ice.gov/news/releases/army-captain-sentenced-smuggling-firearms-parts-japan
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Potentially misleading...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mountains out of molehills
Umm, no actually, that wouldn't be very difficult at all, assuming they kept even moderately accurate records. Simply check the records and see where each piece of gear was sent, then send the recipient a 'request' to check and make sure that they still have it, or provide the documentation regarding it's allocation to wherever it was sent.
Unless of course they want to admit that they don't even bother to keep track of who gets sent what, in which case I could totally believe that such a task would be difficult, if not all but impossible. In that case however, they've got bigger issues than just having some gear stolen every so often.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mountains out of molehills
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Mountains out of molehills
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No new toys...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ITARs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Boosting departmental budgets
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Boosting departmental budgets
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This article is misleading
I would also watch posting screenshots of sellers as they can come back and sue you for defamation of character for giving their business a bad name when you dont have all the facts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Someone's due for a head slap.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]