Australian Politicians Create An Exemption From Data Retention Laws For Themselves... Or Not, Because We Got Fooled
from the not-thinking-it-through dept
Update: Or not. Turns out this was an April Fool's joke that Glyn missed. So, congrats, Crikey, on fooling our most careful writer...
Now that the completely disproportionate data retention law has been rushed through the Australian Parliament, politicians are suddenly realizing that their metadata will be collected too. And so, as was perhaps inevitable, they have asked for an exemption, as reported here by Crikey:
An in-camera meeting of the high-powered Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security last week agreed to task the Department of Defence's signals intelligence arm, the Australian Signals Directorate, and the new Australian Cyber Security Centre with ensuring politicians' metadata is not captured by the government's new data retention regime while they are at work in [the Australian capital] Canberra.
The argument was that:
given Parliament House is supposed to be the centre of Australian democracy, they shouldn't be, you know, tracked while at work there
Well, many people would argue that they shouldn't be tracked either, but obviously politicians are special. It seems that there were two options for achieving this carve-out. One required officials personally identifying and deleting the metadata of politicians, staffers and senior public servants -- a manual process aptly dubbed "handwashing". The other, cheaper, approach -- the one chosen -- was simply to remove metadata from all communications generated within Australia's Parliament House.
Problem solved -- except that some 680,000 visitors enter the building annually, and while they are there, their metadata will not be collected either. Ironically, then, the new exemption for politicians from a scheme allegedly to help the fight against terrorism and crime will turn Parliament House into the perfect location for plotting precisely those things in relative safety.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: australia, data retention, parliament, politicians
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
All citizens of voting age will be required to allow daily visits from federal enforcers in which they will subject themselves to be shat upon for a period of time no less than reasonably expected for the enforcer to finish relieving their bowels on said citizen.
Amended to exclude all government officials, agencies, and employees.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That has to be one of the stupidest things I have read this year.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
1 law for the self perceived elites/nobles. 1 law for the serfs ie the regular citizens.
Those running the "free world" seem hellbent on returning us to the age of feudalism where only the nobles have any rights and everyone else is essentially a slave to their whims
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The first law of politics is do not be caught, and this will help us obey that law.
/sarc
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"The proposal will now go to the Prime Minister’s Office for approval in the 2015 budget process, with the “communications annulment tool (generator in flagpole)” system expected to be operational by April 1, 2016.
*April Fools!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One set of rules
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's at least mostly a joke
I guess Facebook members aren't the only ones that post links without reading the articles.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
April Fool's
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The best lie and/or trick is a believable one
It was close enough to how people expect politicians to act, in this case proposing laws to spy on the public, claiming that there's nothing to be concerned about with regards to said spying, and then exempting themselves from the public being able to see what the politicians are doing/saying, that people took it at face value.
Given what they've done and said to date, how would something like this be out of character? Politicians are infamous for their gross hypocrisy, so something like this? Completely in line with what they've done in the past, so it's not surprising that people thought it was real.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]