Crunch Time For Surveillance: PATRIOT Act Renewal Vote Next Month A Key Metric In The Fight Against Surveillance
from the will-congress-wimp-out dept
In the nearly two years since the first of the Ed Snowden revelations, Congress has proceeded to carefully avoid fixing anything. There have been some votes that have come close, and some attempts to reform the program, but, in part because nothing gets through Congress, nothing has really happened. This is even though the author of the PATRIOT Act, Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, has said that the Act is being misinterpreted to allow mass surveillance and while President Obama himself has called for the program to be changed (though he has failed to step up and stop it himself, even though he has the power to do so).As we've mentioned a few times, however, much of this comes to a head in the next month and a half -- because Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act officially sunsets as of June 1st -- so if Congress doesn't pass legislation renewing it, the program dies. Admittedly, this is just one program -- and there are many other problematic programs that are covered by other parts of the law... but one thing at a time. A bunch of activist groups have gotten together to now launch a campaign looking to convince Congress to not renew Section 215 and you can (and should) use it to contact your elected officials.
Meanwhile, Trevor Timm has a good overview concerning what's at stake:
Of course, you may notice that even though this supposedly "critical" program is set to sunset in under two months there has so far been absolutely no debate whatsoever about the renewal. Don't be surprised. This is totally par for the course. Back in 2011 -- the last time these parts of the PATRIOT Act were extended -- there was no debate and Congress rushed it through with 74 Senators voting against even allowing a debate over the provisions.The massive phone dragnet is not the only thing Section 215 is used for though. As independent journalist Marcy Wheeler has meticulously documented, Section 215 is likely being used for all sorts of surveillance that the public has no idea about. There are an estimated 180 orders from the secret Fisa court that involve Section 215, but we know only five of them are directed at telecom companies for the NSA phone program. To give you a sense of the scale: the one Fisa order published by the Guardian from the Snowden trove compelled Verizon to hand over every phone record that it had on all its millions of customers. Every single one.
While the government claims that its other uses of Section 215 are “critical” to national security, it’s extremely hard to take their word for it. After all, the government lied about collecting information on millions of Americans under Section 215 to begin with. Then they claimed the phone surveillance program was “critical” to national security after it was exposed. That wasn’t true either: they later had to admit it has never stopped a single terrorist attack.
Similarly, at the end of 2012, when the FISA Amendments Act was up for renewal, surveillance state defenders waited until the very end, and then insisted there was no need for debate. Senator Ron Wyden finally forced some debate by threatening to put a hold on the bill. And so, with just days to spare, the Senate held a very weak last minute debate in which a bunch of our elected officials made blatantly false or misleading statements -- peppered with the usual FUD about "terrorism! national security!" -- until the extension passed.
Things are at least a little different this time around, as the Snowden revelations have made this issue a bigger deal. But, history has shown that Congress will do almost anything to avoid debating the issue, and then at the last minute will scream about how we're all going to die if the program isn't renewed. Just watch: it's what's going to happen this time again. That is, unless enough people reach out to their Congressional Representatives and Senators to let them know this is unacceptable. The surveillance state hawks will always defend the program. And the civil liberties supporters will always fight against it. But there's a huge group in the middle that really hasn't taken a stand on this issue -- and it's imperative that they know that their constituents don't want them to continue supporting the NSA's mass surveillance programs.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: bulk records, congress, debate, mass surveillace, nsa, patriot act, section 215, surveillance
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
'No debate needed or wanted'
Their defenders do everything they can to avoid an open debate, because they know, if people were actually allowed to fact check their claims, and they couldn't just coast by with fearmongering, the programs would be shown to be utterly useless at anything other than destroying the rights of the public.
They know that the programs are indefensible, so they don't even try.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 'No debate needed or wanted'
I guess we should be grateful we're not getting all the government we're paying for.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why no debate?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why no debate?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I have friends that are lizardman-UFO-HAARP conspiracy theorists.
This is why the five-man assassination team featuring the guy at the grassy knoll is so palatable when we discuss the Kennedy assassination. That era had conspiracies piled upon each other and it was clear those in government were showing less and less interest in what was the good of the people.
It doesn't matter where in the shadows hide the guns and Damoclean blades that keep our representatives and administrators in step. But there's no question that these weapons are there.
There's no question that those people don't work for us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why no debate?
I mean hell, we've got agencies kidnapping and torturing people, agencies constantly making their own home-grown 'terrorists' and then using them for fearmongering, agencies spying on the american public and grabbing every little bit of information they can get their hands on... a little bribery/blackmail is pretty minor compared to everything else the government is doing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Why no debate?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why no debate?
It really needs to go.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe Obama will just bypass congress again in this case and renew it by executive order.
The only thing that will happen if the patriot act gets repealed is that those alphabet agencies can no longer validate their crimes against Americans by saying its legalized. Instead they will keep committing these crimes no matter that's it illegal once more. They currently blatantly ignore the laws when it comes to people's rights so why would this case be any different.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That's the opposite of power decorated with a faint illusion of it.
Only delusional idiots would approve that. But then we are talking about U.S. Congress here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Can we get rid of the FISA court as well?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Predictability
Yep. That pretty much sums up the whole thing quite nicely.
Move along folks. Nothing to see here. Just Government Inaction, protecting its ass from the Adversary, as usual.
---
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Political Coercion. . .
Obama i think is more an issue of wanting to build consensus and not understanding that the people advising you will always tilt heavily toward there own specialty. So the advise is usually extremely one sided and rarely a thoughtfully considered and balanced policy position!! That's his job as president, and as a supporter, it's something i had hoped he would be better at considering his background in constitutional law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If the current NSA leadership will not obey an order to discontinue the surveillance program they can be replaced through the power of the president.
Barack Obama does not want this to stop or it would be stopped.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]