MPAA's Chris Dodd Tells Each Movie Studio To Donate $40k To Rep. Goodlatte's Election Campaign

from the look-at-that... dept

Fri, Apr 17th 2015 10:40am — Mike Masnick

As you may recall, at the height of the SOPA fight fallout, MPAA boss Chris Dodd went on television and threatened to stop funding the politicians who didn't support the MPAA's copyright agenda:

"Those who count on quote 'Hollywood' for support need to understand that this industry is watching very carefully who's going to stand up for them when their job is at stake. Don't ask me to write a check for you when you think your job is at risk and then don't pay any attention to me when my job is at stake."

Given that statement, this little tidbit from the Sony email archives is interesting. It's Chris Dodd more or less demanding that all of the member studios donate $40,000 to Rep. Bob Goodlatte's re-election campaign. As you may know, Goodlatte is the head of the Judiciary Committee in the House of Representatives, and copyright falls under that committee. Even more to the point, despite the fact that there's an "Intellectual Property Subcommittee" (headed by Rep. Darrell Issa), Goodlatte has made it clear that copyright reform remains under his own personal mandate. In this email, Dodd notes that Goodlatte is coming to LA and there's a fundraiser -- and he asks each of the member studios to see if they can put together $40,000 for Goodlatte's campaign:

Subject: Goodlatte Victory Committee

As you know, for a number of months we have been discussing the political event that Chairman Goodlatte has asked our industry to host in Los Angeles. The event has now been scheduled for November 22. A copy of the invitation is attached. The Goodlatte staff is currently securing a location and I will send that information as soon as it is confirmed.

The event will be in support of the Joint Committee established by the Congressman called the “Goodlatte Victory Committee.” This event is important and in the best interests of our industry.

A number of you have had an opportunity to speak directly with the Chairman in the past few months, and I know you share my view that he is a good man and we are fortunate to have him at the helm of the House Judiciary Committee for the foreseeable future.

TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE and it is now incumbent upon us to work together to make this event a success. I need each of you to commit to attending the event and I would request that each studio raise $40,000 for the Victory Committee at this event.

So, please confirm that you plan to attend on the 22nd in Los Angeles, and that you will meet the per studio target of $40,000. It is incredibly important, in my view, that this event be a success and that we have a broad representation of studio executives in attendance. I will reach out to you later this week, but look forward to hearing from you in the meantime.

Best,

Chris

Now, to be clear, this sort of thing happens all the time. It's more a function of how money in politics works today. It wouldn't surprise me to find out that plenty of other companies in other industries do the same sort of thing -- though, generally speaking, it would be done by the companies themselves, not at the direction of a trade organization. Still, it's a bit of insight into how the process works that I figured some of you might find rather revealing.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: bob goodlatte, chris dodd, congress, copyright, copyright reform, fundraising, hollywood, money in politics, political donations
Companies: mpaa

46 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Michael, 17 Apr 2015 @ 10:45am

Those who count on quote 'Hollywood' for support need to understand that this industry is watching very carefully who's going to stand up for them when their job is at stake. Don't ask me to write a check for you when you think your job is at risk and then don't pay any attention to me when my job is at stake.

It would be a SHAME if something BAD were to happen to that cushy job of yours...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 11:05am
  
  Re:
  You would be a shame if something happened to that $240,000 we could be contributing to your re-election campaign.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shmerl, 17 Apr 2015 @ 11:00am

So, Dodd now wants to put bribery on mass scale? Is there any law to put him in jail for this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Michael, 17 Apr 2015 @ 11:10am
  
  Re:
  It's not bribery if it is in amounts greater than $10k and coming from large corporations. In these cases, it's called "Campaign Finance" and totally ok...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Padpaw (profile), 17 Apr 2015 @ 2:42pm
  
  Re:
  I would imagine several. The question would be is there anyone that will charge him, or just pretend it is not happening like usual
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
jupiterkansas (profile), 17 Apr 2015 @ 11:01am

Mr. Dodd, those that Hollywood counts on for support are watching very carefully too, and we're not happy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 11:02am

I wonder how much money they "donate" to keep "donations" legal.
If they were doing this in the less dangerous places it would be funny but this shit is the reason why the military is still stuck with decades old hardware.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 11:08am

OMG! Therefore do away with all copyright!
C'mon, people. If you want to stop the increase of copyright on Populist grounds, that'd be great.

But this is just Masnick implying extra-ordinary sleaze with everything MPAA does. -- Without actual evidence, just the patented Masnickal innuendo.

While omits mention of Google lobbying and paying off politicians -- and giving NSA "direct access"!

Masnick isn't consistently anti-corporate, but is pro-Google and pro-pirate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Michael, 17 Apr 2015 @ 11:12am
  
  Re: OMG! Therefore do away with all copyright!
  Without actual evidence, just the patented Masnickal innuendo.
  
  Dodd's email isn't "evidence"?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- James Burkhardt (profile), 17 Apr 2015 @ 11:13am
  
  Re: OMG! Therefore do away with all copyright!
  Or you could read the final paragraph where mike admits everyone does it and just wanted to give us insight into the process.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 11:21am
    
    Re: Re: OMG! Therefore do away with all copyright!
    And it's wrong when the others do it as well. This sort of influence is EXACTLY what is wrong with the system.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 11:44am
    
    Re: Re: OMG! Therefore do away with all copyright!
    Well, AC needs to actually read the article first. From his statements, AC either has low comprehension or only read the title before commenting.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- rapnel, 17 Apr 2015 @ 11:15am
  
  Re: OMG! Therefore do away with all copyright!
  Being that it's the copyright "industry" holding their boot on the neck of the Internet and attempting to say what, how and where a person can communicate and what they're allowed to communicate.. from a casual observer point of view.. that "industry" needs to die and if this type of news helps accelerate that ends then so be it. That industry seems to be chock-full of pigs and rats laden with a disease that only spreads.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- DannyB (profile), 17 Apr 2015 @ 2:02pm
  
  Re: OMG! Therefore do away with all copyright!
  First, if you had just stopped at the subject line and not written any body text, you could have gotten an Insightful badge.
  
  Nobody needs to imply extra-ordinary sleaze with the MPAA. The MPAA (and RIAA) proudly attach themselves to sleaze.
  
  Without actual evidence? But the MPAA and RIAA seem to like "without evidence" when it suits them.
  
  Please do not imply that the owner of this site would engage in patent trolling.
  
  If Google is giving the NSA any direct access, it sure isn't willingly, or publicly.
  
  What is wrong with being pro-Some Business one happens to like? Would you be complaining if someone were pro-MPAA? Or pro-Sleaze?
  
  Being pro-pirate assumes facts not in evidence.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 11:09am

Without a doubt
Without a doubt, Chris Dodd is the biggest scumbag in the world... First, he authors the sub-prime scandal,... now he blatantly acts as Hollywood's whore and pimp...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Roger Strong (profile), 17 Apr 2015 @ 12:03pm
  
  Re: Without a doubt
  You really shouldn't go calling someone a "whore" over this legalized bribery.
  
  In other news today, House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster admits sleeping with a top lobbyist for the leading U.S. airline trade association, an organization that spends millions of dollars trying to influence his panel.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 12:15pm
    
    Re: Re: Without a doubt
    Not to mention calling Chris Dodd a whore is disrespectful to actual whores everywhere.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 11:33am

It is useful to note that the trade industry association here was specifically set up by the major movie studios who are its members, financial supporters, and on whose behalf the association is tasked to operate. While the association serves as their "mouthpiece", what comes out of its mouth is typically vetted beforehand by the membership collectively. This is, quite frankly, how most such industry associations that I have worked with operate, so what is contained in the purloined email is not at all surprising or unusual.

I express no opinion about the "goodness" or "badness" of fundraising on behalf politicians by industry associations because that is an entirely different discussion. The point here is that the email reflects the "business as usual" norm.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike Masnick (profile), 17 Apr 2015 @ 12:05pm
  
  Re:
  While the association serves as their "mouthpiece", what comes out of its mouth is typically vetted beforehand by the membership collectively.
  
  That must explain why Dodd is *telling the members what to do* rather than the other way around... oh wait...
  
  The point here is that the email reflects the "business as usual" norm.
  
  As noted in the post itself. You might want to try reading before attacking.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 12:14pm
    
    Re: Re:
    What attack? My comment was only that this is the norm in associations set up by large business entities like movie studios.
    
    For example, you mentioned elsewhere that you had insight into the aerospace industry. In the US most aerospace companies are members of an industry association known, quite unsurprisingly, as the Aerospace Industries Association (AIA). Its initiatives are all pre-decided by the membership, and details are likewise pre-decided by numerous committees, with formal communications expressing membership positions taking place between association staff and government officials (be they congressional, executive, foreign, etc.). This allows companies, rightly or wrongly, to retain that wonderful position known as "plausible deniability".
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 19 Apr 2020 @ 6:13am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Nice try, Slonecker.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 12:05pm
  
  Response to: Anonymous Coward on Apr 17th, 2015 @ 11:33am
  I think when you suggest that you will lose you job if you don't play ball, youve gone beyond 'fund raising'
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 3:12pm
  
  Re:
  There should be no fund raising at any level. The govt should have a set forum that pays for the air time for each candidate to deliver there messages. Each of these forums should clearly list the agenda which lists the candidants stance. All statements must be fact checked before they can spew their messages.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 19 Apr 2015 @ 5:45am
    
    Re: Re:
    Better yet, candidates should only be funded by individuals living in their constituency. If they are dependent on the people that they are meant to represent for funds perhaps they would start to represent them.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 12:10pm

I'm sure Bob Goodlatte will remain totally impartial as he rolls around in his bribe money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 12:21pm

the pisser is the amount of noise and complaints the studios would make if the public were to donate similar amounts of cash to the representative who wanted to abolish copyright! they wouldn't put up with that yet the public are supposed to put up with companies screwing them into the ground and removing options they should legally have!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 1:07pm
  
  Re:
  That is unrealistic. Do you know Hollywood accounting? If you can't make money on the movie, make it up in incentives and courts. That requires keeping the politicians greased!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 12:36pm

This will never end because Americans are never going to stop buying their crap. Cut off the money and take a bite out of corruption; or STFU...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- jupiterkansas (profile), 17 Apr 2015 @ 12:44pm
  
  Re:
  Because they've made it so easy and affordable for filmmakers outside of their system to get financing, get distribution, get theatre screens, and get an audience's attention. And if people are successful without their help, it's not long before such people are offered huge sums of money to join them.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 12:53pm

Here's their talking points to use with Goodlatte and Hatch
Look at the attachment link at https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/110336

Here's one of the suggested questions to ask Orrin Hatch at the fundraiser (The questions are listed right after guidelines about how much $$ to contribute):

6. On the Finance Committee, which Senators should we cultivate as pro-copyright leaders to support your trade agenda?

Translation: How can we get more people like you in our back pocket.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 12:59pm

USTR lets MPAA do some of their negotiations
(hat tip to Jamie Love. See
https://twitter.com/jamie_love/status/588876814942089216 )

"As USTR has previously advised MOFCOM, the MPAA will be handling the remaining negotiations" https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/107079

Looks like USTR not only follows MPAA directions, they also let the MPAA do the driving occasionally.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 1:07pm

Masnick's employer Google spends more on lobbying than any other company in America. That is a fact.

But you won't hear facts like that from someone that hates actors and musicians, will you?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 1:23pm
  
  Re:
  Masnick's employer Google spends more on lobbying than any other company in America. That is a fact.
  
  We have different definitions of fact.
  
  http://money.cnn.com/2014/10/01/investing/companies-lobbying-10-biggest-spenders/
  
  https://www.op ensecrets.org/lobby/top.php?showYear=2014&indexType=s
  
  Google does appear to be a growing spender, but hardly "more than any other company in America." It appears that the largest single spender (by far) is the US Chamber of Commerce -- who is HEAVILY funded by the major studios and took the lead on promoting SOPA/PIPA.
  
  You're wrong. Will you admit that you were wrong? Let's see...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - John Fenderson (profile), 17 Apr 2015 @ 1:49pm
    
    Re: Re:
    "Will you admit that you were wrong?"
    
    Of course he won't. Any comment that includes the accusation that Masnick is employed by Google is intentionally lying (and doing a terrible job at it.)
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - That One Guy (profile), 17 Apr 2015 @ 1:49pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Have an insightful vote for the links, and a funny vote for expecting them to admit that they were wrong.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- That One Guy (profile), 17 Apr 2015 @ 1:45pm
  
  Re:
  But you won't hear facts like that from someone that hates actors and musicians, will you?
  
  What are you talking about, you lot say it all the time.
  
  As for dollar amounts, check your source, Google is not in fact at the top, either individually as a company, or overall. No, the #1 spender when it comes to lobbying is the 'US Chamber of Commerce', that despite having a name that makes it sound like a government department, is most certainly anything but. On the list of top spenders for 2014 as far as lobbying goes, Google is ranked #9, right below Comcast($16.83M vs $16.97M respectively).
  
  Source
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - DannyB (profile), 17 Apr 2015 @ 2:05pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Sir, if you were to apply Hollywood Accounting to your data you would clearly see that he is right.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- techflaws (profile), 17 Apr 2015 @ 10:45pm
  
  Re:
  "Masnick's employer Google" and the going on about facts? Yeah, that won't fly, silly.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
anony, 17 Apr 2015 @ 2:28pm

What a shame!!!
Do the studios not realise that the more they pay the more Dodd will do everything he can to make the situation worse so that he can demand more to supposedly resolve the issues that he and his cronies are promoting.

I would not be surprised in the least if Dodd had personally spent money on supporting torrent sites so that he can attack them, or supposedly attack them, he is not going to do the right thing and solve the studios problems , he would lose his job and all that wonderful power and money he demands from the studios.

Saying that it is nice to have this evidence of bribery and hopefully anyone looking to take this politician on during the voting season will have fun making many youtube videos showing how this politician is corrupt , paid and controlled by someone with a specific agenda that is not in the public's best interest, damn it is not even in the studios best interest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 3:03pm

""Those who count on quote 'Hollywood' for support...."

its just amazes me that they can be so blunt about their criminal activities.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 17 Apr 2015 @ 4:53pm

'Merika - Home of the best laws you can buy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 6:38pm

Nobody has the stones to bitch slap this guy? How pathetic is that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Apr 2015 @ 6:40pm

Wait, aren't movie studios all poor and dying as a result of piracy? Where are they going to magic up $40000 just to pay a mouthpiece?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Simon, 18 Apr 2015 @ 6:02am

Sounds good
"Chris, we find this acceptable, here's a check for $184".

"But it's supposed to be $40,000!"

"Hollywood accounting Chris, Hollywood accounting."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Apr 2015 @ 8:09am

Im confused

Is it a government or a corporation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Reality bites, 27 Apr 2015 @ 12:58pm

The Mafia is way more honorable
At least when you pay your protection money you actually get something in return. The MPAA and RIAA demand protection money then send the feral lawyers around to burn your place down anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]