MPAA's Chris Dodd Tells Each Movie Studio To Donate $40k To Rep. Goodlatte's Election Campaign
from the look-at-that... dept
As you may recall, at the height of the SOPA fight fallout, MPAA boss Chris Dodd went on television and threatened to stop funding the politicians who didn't support the MPAA's copyright agenda:"Those who count on quote 'Hollywood' for support need to understand that this industry is watching very carefully who's going to stand up for them when their job is at stake. Don't ask me to write a check for you when you think your job is at risk and then don't pay any attention to me when my job is at stake."Given that statement, this little tidbit from the Sony email archives is interesting. It's Chris Dodd more or less demanding that all of the member studios donate $40,000 to Rep. Bob Goodlatte's re-election campaign. As you may know, Goodlatte is the head of the Judiciary Committee in the House of Representatives, and copyright falls under that committee. Even more to the point, despite the fact that there's an "Intellectual Property Subcommittee" (headed by Rep. Darrell Issa), Goodlatte has made it clear that copyright reform remains under his own personal mandate. In this email, Dodd notes that Goodlatte is coming to LA and there's a fundraiser -- and he asks each of the member studios to see if they can put together $40,000 for Goodlatte's campaign:
Subject: Goodlatte Victory CommitteeNow, to be clear, this sort of thing happens all the time. It's more a function of how money in politics works today. It wouldn't surprise me to find out that plenty of other companies in other industries do the same sort of thing -- though, generally speaking, it would be done by the companies themselves, not at the direction of a trade organization. Still, it's a bit of insight into how the process works that I figured some of you might find rather revealing.
As you know, for a number of months we have been discussing the political event that Chairman Goodlatte has asked our industry to host in Los Angeles. The event has now been scheduled for November 22. A copy of the invitation is attached. The Goodlatte staff is currently securing a location and I will send that information as soon as it is confirmed.
The event will be in support of the Joint Committee established by the Congressman called the “Goodlatte Victory Committee.” This event is important and in the best interests of our industry.
A number of you have had an opportunity to speak directly with the Chairman in the past few months, and I know you share my view that he is a good man and we are fortunate to have him at the helm of the House Judiciary Committee for the foreseeable future.
TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE and it is now incumbent upon us to work together to make this event a success. I need each of you to commit to attending the event and I would request that each studio raise $40,000 for the Victory Committee at this event.
So, please confirm that you plan to attend on the 22nd in Los Angeles, and that you will meet the per studio target of $40,000. It is incredibly important, in my view, that this event be a success and that we have a broad representation of studio executives in attendance. I will reach out to you later this week, but look forward to hearing from you in the meantime.
Best,
Chris
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: bob goodlatte, chris dodd, congress, copyright, copyright reform, fundraising, hollywood, money in politics, political donations
Companies: mpaa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
It would be a SHAME if something BAD were to happen to that cushy job of yours...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If they were doing this in the less dangerous places it would be funny but this shit is the reason why the military is still stuck with decades old hardware.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
OMG! Therefore do away with all copyright!
But this is just Masnick implying extra-ordinary sleaze with everything MPAA does. -- Without actual evidence, just the patented Masnickal innuendo.
While omits mention of Google lobbying and paying off politicians -- and giving NSA "direct access"!
Masnick isn't consistently anti-corporate, but is pro-Google and pro-pirate.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Without a doubt
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: OMG! Therefore do away with all copyright!
Dodd's email isn't "evidence"?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: OMG! Therefore do away with all copyright!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: OMG! Therefore do away with all copyright!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: OMG! Therefore do away with all copyright!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I express no opinion about the "goodness" or "badness" of fundraising on behalf politicians by industry associations because that is an entirely different discussion. The point here is that the email reflects the "business as usual" norm.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: OMG! Therefore do away with all copyright!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Without a doubt
In other news today, House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster admits sleeping with a top lobbyist for the leading U.S. airline trade association, an organization that spends millions of dollars trying to influence his panel.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
That must explain why Dodd is *telling the members what to do* rather than the other way around... oh wait...
The point here is that the email reflects the "business as usual" norm.
As noted in the post itself. You might want to try reading before attacking.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Apr 17th, 2015 @ 11:33am
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
For example, you mentioned elsewhere that you had insight into the aerospace industry. In the US most aerospace companies are members of an industry association known, quite unsurprisingly, as the Aerospace Industries Association (AIA). Its initiatives are all pre-decided by the membership, and details are likewise pre-decided by numerous committees, with formal communications expressing membership positions taking place between association staff and government officials (be they congressional, executive, foreign, etc.). This allows companies, rightly or wrongly, to retain that wonderful position known as "plausible deniability".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Without a doubt
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Here's their talking points to use with Goodlatte and Hatch
Here's one of the suggested questions to ask Orrin Hatch at the fundraiser (The questions are listed right after guidelines about how much $$ to contribute):
6. On the Finance Committee, which Senators should we cultivate as pro-copyright leaders to support your trade agenda?
Translation: How can we get more people like you in our back pocket.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
USTR lets MPAA do some of their negotiations
https://twitter.com/jamie_love/status/588876814942089216 )
"As USTR has previously advised MOFCOM, the MPAA will be handling the remaining negotiations" https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/107079
Looks like USTR not only follows MPAA directions, they also let the MPAA do the driving occasionally.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
But you won't hear facts like that from someone that hates actors and musicians, will you?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
We have different definitions of fact.
http://money.cnn.com/2014/10/01/investing/companies-lobbying-10-biggest-spenders/
https://www.op ensecrets.org/lobby/top.php?showYear=2014&indexType=s
Google does appear to be a growing spender, but hardly "more than any other company in America." It appears that the largest single spender (by far) is the US Chamber of Commerce -- who is HEAVILY funded by the major studios and took the lead on promoting SOPA/PIPA.
You're wrong. Will you admit that you were wrong? Let's see...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
What are you talking about, you lot say it all the time.
As for dollar amounts, check your source, Google is not in fact at the top, either individually as a company, or overall. No, the #1 spender when it comes to lobbying is the 'US Chamber of Commerce', that despite having a name that makes it sound like a government department, is most certainly anything but. On the list of top spenders for 2014 as far as lobbying goes, Google is ranked #9, right below Comcast($16.83M vs $16.97M respectively).
Source
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Of course he won't. Any comment that includes the accusation that Masnick is employed by Google is intentionally lying (and doing a terrible job at it.)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: OMG! Therefore do away with all copyright!
Nobody needs to imply extra-ordinary sleaze with the MPAA. The MPAA (and RIAA) proudly attach themselves to sleaze.
Without actual evidence? But the MPAA and RIAA seem to like "without evidence" when it suits them.
Please do not imply that the owner of this site would engage in patent trolling.
If Google is giving the NSA any direct access, it sure isn't willingly, or publicly.
What is wrong with being pro-Some Business one happens to like? Would you be complaining if someone were pro-MPAA? Or pro-Sleaze?
Being pro-pirate assumes facts not in evidence.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What a shame!!!
I would not be surprised in the least if Dodd had personally spent money on supporting torrent sites so that he can attack them, or supposedly attack them, he is not going to do the right thing and solve the studios problems , he would lose his job and all that wonderful power and money he demands from the studios.
Saying that it is nice to have this evidence of bribery and hopefully anyone looking to take this politician on during the voting season will have fun making many youtube videos showing how this politician is corrupt , paid and controlled by someone with a specific agenda that is not in the public's best interest, damn it is not even in the studios best interest.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
its just amazes me that they can be so blunt about their criminal activities.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sounds good
"But it's supposed to be $40,000!"
"Hollywood accounting Chris, Hollywood accounting."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Is it a government or a corporation
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Mafia is way more honorable
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Nice try, Slonecker.
[ link to this | view in thread ]