Techdirt Podcast Episode 30: Does Distance Matter In The Digital Age?
from the close-and-far dept
The internet has changed the parameters for how people can interact. Today, all sorts of work and socialization can be done over distances that were previously impossible, and the rise of telecommuting has been no surprise. And yet there are still a lot of imperfections in the system, and a lot of ways that the internet doesn't quite seem to close the gap as much as we'd like it to. In this week's episode, we ask the question of how much face-to-face communication still matters in the digital age, and what the future holds for long-distance interactions.
Follow the Techdirt Podcast on Soundcloud, subscribe via iTunes, or grab the RSS feed. You can also keep up with all the latest episodes right here on Techdirt.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: communication, podcast, telecommuting
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Time matters, not distance
But time does.
Possibly no technology in the history of man has been so efficient at eliminating the current moment--burying it, destroying it--so that the next moment can happen in complete novelty.
Right to forget is just the start: soon it will be, "no right to remember." Everything you see will be without antecedent; and will evaporate to nothingness, never to be seen again.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Yes it Does
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Time matters, not distance
I always thought the inexorable passage of time did an excellent job of that all by itself...?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The problem is equipment?
And then of course there is the holodeck. Again, VR without gear. If they get that working this is all moot....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The problem is equipment?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Time matters, not distance
These days, with automatic software cleanup, short retention policies, the obscurity of software data storage, inability to search for anything over a week old, and transient nature of ISPs, well...
No one still cares, but after the improvements of modern technology, there won't even be shards to look at.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Time matters, not distance
Do you honestly believe that?
1) My automatic software also *backs up* all my data in more than one place, with stuff going back for years. My records and mementos are far more secure today than they ever have been.
2) Which short retention policies are the issue, exactly? I've never had any data that I wanted to keep disappear because of that. All my memories on Facebook are intact; all my tweets are apparently in the Library of Congress. The great thing about data retention policies is that we get to set them, instead of being tied down to the physical lifespan of the data.
3) Obscurity of storage methods may, indeed, cause some issues in the future. I'm a big supporter of the various groups working to pre-empt this issue.
4) Inability to search for anything over a week old? What? I regularly search stuff way older than that. Not only are there plenty of archives to help me find online material that's 10 or 20 years old, I can pop up Google Newspaper Archives and browse century-or-more-old newspapers from all over the world.
It seems to me your issue is that, if our civilization entirely collapses, a future one will have a harder time learning about us than we did learning about ancient civilizations. That might be true (though I've long been fascinated by the concept of a "data archaeologist" that such a future civilization might have). But honestly, is that our priority concern? Our technology has enabled us to have far, far more access to knowledge and history and communication, on a democratized global level, than ever before in history. I can go right now and look at high-resolution 3D photos of those "dropped pots" from Feudal Japan or Medieval Europe or Ancient Rome or the prehistoric stone age tribes from Mongolia to France. Then I can read academic papers about them, talk about them on a message board with career archaeologists, and book a flight and an AirBnB stay in the city where they are on display, all without leaving my chair. I can take photos of my trip and instantly share them with my friends and relatives, and put them into a permanent backed-up archive that I can then access from anywhere in the world and share with anyone I choose.
Are we going to give all that up, just to make sure that a hypothetical successor civilization to ours has more dropped pots to look at?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]