Fast Track Moves Forward And Now The Fight Is On TPP Directly
from the well-that-sucks dept
As noted last week, Congress played some games last week and was able to move forward on fast track authority (Trade Promotion Authority -- or TPA) in the House by decoupling it from Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA). Before that, everyone had said that TPA couldn't move forward in the Senate without TAA, but it did move forward with exactly 60 votes (the minimum it needed). That means fast track is going to the President's desk, and of course he'll sign it. Previously, the President had promised that he wouldn't sign TPA without TAA, so I'm still at a loss as to how that's happening, since the House hasn't approved TAA yet and theoretically could block Obama from signing TPA by rejecting TAA -- if (and it's a big if) President Obama actually stands by that promise. However, the way everyone's talking about this, it seems pretty clear that Congress is just going to cave, and will pass TAA as well.And, effectively, that means this is a done deal. As bizarre as it sounds, Republicans in Congress (with the help of a small group of Democrats) have given up their own Constitutional powers to regulate international commerce, and handed it to the President of an opposing party, while the majority of Democrats fought to keep their own President (and the next President...) from having such powers.
In the end, this means that the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement is pretty much a done deal. Negotiators have more or less said that it's ready to go, but thanks to having fast track, our own Congress will not be able to call out any of the problems in the agreement -- or ask for any changes. It can only vote thumbs up or thumbs down on the agreement. And that means that the very dangerous corporate giveaways on intellectual property laws -- locking us into extended copyrights, weakening the ability to make and sell cheap drugs -- and corporate sovereignty provisions -- allowing companies to sue for taxpayer funds over "lost profits" due to regulatory changes, is about to expand massively.
At this point, about the only way I can see that the TPP doesn't make it across the finish line is if there's a huge public outcry, making it totally toxic to Congress, but that seems like a very big long shot. So, thanks, Congress, for selling out the American public to a few big corporations today. It's going to do real harm, and you'll pretend you didn't realize that down the road. What a sham.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: congress, corporate sovereignty, fast track, isds, president obama, taa, tpa, tpp, trade agreements
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Constitutionality
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not surprising at all
There's nothing 'bizarre' about it, money speaks louder than party affiliation or hatred, and I'm sure the corporations writing the 'trade' agreements have been less than subtle about what would happen to the 'donations' of anyone who didn't support FTA.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Constitutionality
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Playing the long game
'In so doing, Congress will surrender remarkable authority to Obama and his successors. For the next six years, Congress will be unable to amend any trade deal signed by the president, and only 50 votes will be required for Senate passage—a reduced burden that hasn’t been granted to minimum-wage hikes, equal-pay legislation, gun control, campaign-finance reform, nor any other non-budgetary legislation of the Obama era.'
...
'On the Republican side, Boehner will almost surely have a more difficult time gathering Republican votes for the TPP than he did for fast track. One argument frequently made by Republicans during the congressional fast-track debate was that it benefited the GOP, too—that it was also a vote to give a theoretical Republican president in 2017 immense power to shape trade deals without congressional meddling. That has no application to the TPP debate.'
Sure they're giving up power to Obama now, but his second term is just about over, so they may feel it's worth the short-term loss if it means giving the next president, which they naturally hope is a republican, the same powers.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Yes I realize past presidents do the same thing but that neither here nor there. We should focus on what the current one does.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Indifference
The almost complete lack of public interest over TPP has me worried. Perhaps when the text goes public there will be greater interest (assuming there's enough time to inform the public), but at this point I've pretty much lost hope.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What would help is if the EU already votes to reject TTIP and TISA. That would be a BIG question mark on the TPP as well.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Barring that, can the TPP be superseded by another treaty that undoes everything bad the TPP will bring?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Indifference
It's going to take a lot more than just "spreading the word" to disarm this corporate nuke.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
About the only time that changes is when one of those pushing for the agreement feels like gushing about how great and awesome it is, all of course without providing any supporting details to back up their claims.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Indifference
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Aaaahahahahaha!!!!
Forget it. It wasn't even a promise but a tactical threat and circumstances changed.
And Obama has no track record of honoring his promises even under unchanged circumstances.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Indifference
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
The problem, however, is that while Congress is free to decide on the text of any laws required by the treaty, the Federal Government's obligations to other countries don't depend on such laws being enacted. The US could be held liable for violating the terms of the treaty even if the treaty had no effect on US courts.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Naturally he'll then sign the TPP and Congress will vote to ratify it.
Face it, this was a done deal from the start. The entire US government is corrupt to the core and for sale to the highest bidder.
Obama claims to support clean energy, but I guarantee you, absolutely, positively GUARANTEE that he will grant the final permit that Shell needs to drill in the arctic.
Obama is a lying weasel, just like 99% of all politicians.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
TPP
These pacts are largely about deregulation and the free movement of capital. The problem comes when something goes wrong with the economic environment and capital begins to move violently from one market to another, like cargo shifting in a ship during a storm.
Analogy: The first recorded example of bulkheads was in 1119, when a Soong Dynasty writer described their use on junks. The advantages of not sinking by regulating the movement of cargo and water proved irresistable to people from Marco Polo to Benjamin Franklin. But so far, the need for international financial bulkheads to prevent similar financial disasters seems totally unrecognized. And the prediction is that it will remain unrecognized until yet another massive economic crisis and the sinking of a few more sovereign ships. That's sad, but stupidity and willful ignorance have a high price. As they say in aviation, safety always looks expensive until you have a crash.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Example: Foreign copyright holders could sue the United States should Congress decide to shorten the length of copyright protection. Going by DMCA-like numbers (multiplied by the number of claimants), such a decision could become a major financial liability for the United States. In fact, I don't think I'd be wrong to suggest that it would bankrupt the US government, at least on paper.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Constitutionality
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1983
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Constitutionality
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: TPP
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: TPP
Trans-Pacific Partnership
Doesn't “EU” stand for “European Union”? And isn't Europe on the other side of the Straits of Malacca? Anyhow, I don't see “EU” on the list.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Panem et circenses
[ link to this | view in thread ]
So this is how democracy falls...
with a golf cl--
with a sigh.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: So this is how democracy falls...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The future, Laws for profit, where money dictates how much "freedom" you have, oh wait, what am i saying, lol, the future
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Playing the long game
Can't think of a sweeter irony than republicans ultimately handing control to someone who literally describes himself as a "democratic socialist."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Playing the long game
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
It's over. They won.
You may as well go ahead and get your seven proxies ready and lube up.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Over?
And yes, I know there are still people working hard from the grass roots level to kill it. I hope and pray they succeed in that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Over?
Of course, even if by some miracle we torpedo this thing like we did SOPA, we then need to do the same thing again to TTIP and TISA, as well as any other bullshit treaty that comes through.
And we would only have about 60 days each time, and can't depend on anyone filibustering anything
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: TPP
[ link to this | view in thread ]
TPP and Net Neutrality
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Are you really? It's Barack Obama. He's as big a liar as all the recent presidents have been; why expect him to tell the truth about this?!?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
CT Day Dreaming.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
WE GET TO READ THE AGREEMENT NOW.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Um...
No, I don't know how that works either, since it means people can be prosecuted according to secret law.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wow...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Laws for profit...
Around the 19th century we pretty much decided we were tires of that bullshit.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Laws for profit...
[ link to this | view in thread ]