Europe Frees Zorro From Trademark Restrictions
from the z dept
Zorro, the masked vigilante who wields justice in the form of a sword, was first brought to the world in 1919 by Johnston McCulley. As such, some portion of the Zorro existence is now in the public domain in many jurisdictions. That hasn't stopped Zorro Productions Inc. from claiming all kinds of intellectual property rights on all things Zorro, of course. A few years back, there was a lawsuit between Zorro Production and Mars over a depiction of the hero in a commercial for M&Ms. That was a trademark claim, the rights for which Zorro Productions claims for itself, and one of the interesting questions in the case was whether such a trademark claim could be made upon a character that had entered into the public domain. Put another way: can the expiration of copyright law on a fictional character be circumvented through a trademark claim. One of the keys to answering that question, as is discussed in the above post, is whether a specific use of the character would confuse the public as to the source of the original creation, or if it might be misconstrued as any kind of endorsement. Mickey Mouse, for instance, equals Disney. Does Zorro equal Zorro Productions? Of course not.
And now the European Union has recognized that fact, actually going so far as to invalidating the Zorro trademark entirely for that very reason.
Late last month, the cancellation division of the office that manages community trademarks within the European Union issued a ruling declaring that a "Zorro" trademark was invalid in the categories of printed matter and entertainment. According to a just-released English version of the ruling, when the average consumer sees "Zorro," he or she will assume the story of the character is being told, but not recognize "Zorro" as an indicator of origin. As such, it's deemed to be merely descriptive and not sufficiently distinctive.This was sparked after Zorro Productions had waged a legal war with Robert Cabell, who created a theatrical production entitled Z - The Musical of Zorro. Cabell had responded to the attack by trying to get the EU to acknowledge that the character was in the public domain from a copyright perspective and that the trademarks held by Zorro Productions had been registered fraudulently. The EU concurred.
"If a title in question is famous enough to be truly well known to the relevant public where the mark can be perceived in the context of the goods/services as primarily signifying a famous story or book title, a mark may be perceived as non-distinctive," states the decision. "A finding of non-distinctiveness in this regard will be more likely where it can be shown that a large number of published version of the story have appeared and/or where there have been numerous television, theatre and film adaptations reaching a wide audience."And so Zorro has been freed from the EU prison of intellectual property, at least in these respects. And, more importantly, this is a good thing. I have no idea of the quality of Cabell's musical about the masked vigilante, but I damn well know that a character created a century ago, whose author is long-dead, ought not be denied in the use of the public in the aims of creating more art simply because a corporate interest wants to sell non-existent rights to Hollywood.
Zorro, which has resulted in 38 films, fits this description, says the Office for Harmonization, which adds that "although it is possible for titles of books or names of fictional characters to function as indicators of trade origin, it is dependent on the particular goods and services which they are applied for."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Yet another nail in creativity's coffin
With this horrendous ruling, the creator of Zorro now has absolutely zero incentive to rise from his grave and create more works, which will obviously have serious repercussions on the creation of more Zorro related movies/books/comics, significantly harming both creativity, and culture as a whole.
Sure I can hear you already, "But others can take the character and create new works around him", but such a claim is the very personification of absurdity. Without incentive for zombie Johnston McCulley to create new works, no real Zorro creations will be made, and given cultural works are only valid when made by the original creator, that means the character of Zorro(and any characters derived from, or inspired by him) is, and will forever more, remain as dead as zombie Johnston McCulley.
Truly a sad day indeed for creativity everywhere.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Yet another nail in creativity's coffin
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Yet another nail in creativity's coffin
I do expect Disney to build on top of Zorro and copyright into eternity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Yet another nail in creativity's coffin
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TOG
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Yet another nail in creativity's coffin
Disney still maintains both trademarks (under the name "Disney's Zorro") and copyrights for their tv series version, which was released on DVD a couple of years ago.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Yet another nail in creativity's coffin
I didn't, the mention of Zorro's creator rising from his grave was sufficient to clue me in.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The big Z
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The big Z
Oh, of course señor. That is the number 'two'.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The big Z
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's going to leave a mark.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: That's going to leave a mark.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's going to leave a mark.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: That's going to leave a mark.
Son, come over here and show me how to delete this comment the computer made.
No! I didn't click submit. It just went on its own. Dadgummed Internets!!
What do you mean you can't delete it? No, all I see now is a set of solitaire cards.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm in the UK
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]