IRS Encrypts An Entire CD Of Redacted Documents In Response To FOIA Request

from the how-nice-of-them dept

Tue, Jul 21st 2015 1:53pm — Mike Masnick

Muckrock has a story of Alex Richardson, seeking information on the IRS's Whistleblower Office, which has been receiving some scrutiny lately. Richardson filed a bunch of FOIA requests and discovered that the IRS apparently would like to make his life as difficult as possible. First he got an infamous GLOMAR "neither confirm nor deny" response -- which was supposed to be limited to national security issues. However, with at least one request, a package with a CD just arrived... and Richardson was dismayed to find the contents of the CD encrypted.

That seems a bit strange for a response to a FOIA request, since whatever is being delivered is supposed to be public, but whatever. The letter accompanying the CD explains, for reasons unknown, that while the IRS was only returning 6 of the 23 pages that had been located, it was doing so with encryption, and it would send the key separately.

Again, this seems like weird operational security for public documents. Now, also, in the response letter, it noted that the reason only 6 pages are included is because the rest were withheld under FOIA exemptions:

So you had to imagine that in those 6 pages, there should at least be some relevant information. Nope. It appears that the IRS went through all that to give a final middle finger to Richardson, because when he finally decrypted the documents... they're all redacted too. Six pages, entirely blacked out. Which makes you wonder why the other 17 were "withheld" in the first place. What difference could it have made?

As Muckrock notes at the end of its piece:

Just GLOMAR us next time, IRS. Save us both a lot of grief, and it's a lot less cruel.

2014 52486 Response Enclosure Redacted Pdf (PDF)2014 52486 Response Enclosure Redacted Pdf (Text)

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: encryption, foia, irs, redaction

19 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Mason Wheeler (profile), 21 Jul 2015 @ 1:59pm

Does anyone have a good idea of what it is he was trying to get information about, based on the criteria specified in the article? Whatever it is, it looks like something interesting...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Kaden (profile), 21 Jul 2015 @ 2:13pm
  
  Re:
  Maybe related to this kinda thing? https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/md-dc-utilities-pay-paper-mills-burning-black-liquor -for-alternative-fuel-credits/2013/02/22/440078da-696b-11e2-95b3-272d604a10a3_story.html
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
DigDug, 21 Jul 2015 @ 2:12pm

Good idea...
I'll use it on my next tax returns, I'll redact the entire thing except for what they owe me.

:)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Jul 2015 @ 2:15pm

I'm glad the government works for us. Imagine what would happen if they thought they governed us!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That One Other Not So Random Guy, 21 Jul 2015 @ 2:15pm

That seems a bit strange for a response to a FOIA request, since whatever is being delivered is supposed to be public, but whatever.
I work in the health industry now and all our FOIA's, when seeking info on Medicare issues for example, come on a disk with a password protected .zip file, with a follow up letter with the password. All of them. Someone deemed there to be personal info or maybe just was not trained properly and is treating all FOIA's the same.

As far as giving someone all redacted pages... welcome to Merika, now go away.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Joseph Young, 21 Jul 2015 @ 9:45pm
  
  Good protocol
  Actually, it's good protocol: All data on media that are to be taken off site must be encrypted, with keys transferred separately. If you leave it to the discretion of staff, there will be times when they get it wrong, and fail to encrypt sensitive data.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Jul 2015 @ 2:43pm

Not even redacted documents...these are fake
I don't think the files were redacted so much as created. The whole pdf file was 5kB, which leads me to believe they just created a pdf file with a black background and the USC text they added.

The requester should sue for failure to fulfill the FOIA request as the IRS did not return any documents...they merely created fake documents.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Daniel (profile), 21 Jul 2015 @ 2:47pm
  
  Re: Not even redacted documents...these are fake
  Easier said than done, lawyers don't work for free.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Daniel (profile), 21 Jul 2015 @ 2:47pm
  
  Re: Not even redacted documents...these are fake
  Easier said than done, lawyers don't work for free.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Jul 2015 @ 2:54pm

The US Government Bureaucracy: One-Uppping Kafka since 1776.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Jul 2015 @ 3:25pm

FBI Drone Impact Assessment
Kind of like that FBI drone assessment where they redacted everything except the cover page, and then a couple of years later denied that the document even existed.

[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Jul 2015 @ 3:38pm

That was the IRS saying "Fuck You, we don't give a fuck what you want ..you'll get what we give you.. and you'll like it."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Capt ICE Enforcer, 21 Jul 2015 @ 3:57pm

The real question
The real question that should be asked. Was the password "PASSWORD"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wyrm (profile), 21 Jul 2015 @ 7:41pm

Is that the government version of "you got Rick-rolled"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 21 Jul 2015 @ 8:19pm
  
  Re:
  That would be sweet if he finally got the document opened up and the video started to play.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
toyotabedzrock (profile), 21 Jul 2015 @ 11:48pm

Well at least we know someone really got it into their heads that all data leaving the building must be encrypted.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Jul 2015 @ 11:55pm

This must be to illicit a "why bother" mentality from requestors. Frustrate enough times and people will stop asking.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 22 Jul 2015 @ 3:13am

It could have been worse. Imagine receiving thousands of completely blank documents. And being charged for every page.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ninja (profile), 22 Jul 2015 @ 4:34am

No problem, if you are a GOOD GUY© you already have the secret GOLDEN KEY™ to open the file. Right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]