Muckrock has a story of Alex Richardson, seeking information on the IRS's Whistleblower Office, which has been receiving some scrutiny lately. Richardson filed a bunch of FOIA requests and discovered that the IRS apparently would like to make his life as difficult as possible. First he got an infamous GLOMAR "neither confirm nor deny" response -- which was supposed to be limited to national security issues. However, with at least one request, a package with a CD just arrived... and Richardson was dismayed to find the contents of the CD encrypted.
That seems a bit strange for a response to a FOIA request, since whatever is being delivered is supposed to be public, but whatever. The letter accompanying the CD explains, for reasons unknown, that while the IRS was only returning 6 of the 23 pages that had been located, it was doing so with encryption, and it would send the key separately.
Again, this seems like weird operational security for public documents. Now, also, in the response letter, it noted that the reason only 6 pages are included is because the rest were withheld under FOIA exemptions:
So you had to imagine that in those 6 pages, there should at least be some relevant information. Nope. It appears that the IRS went through all that to give a final middle finger to Richardson, because when he finally decrypted the documents... they're all redacted too. Six pages, entirely blacked out. Which makes you wonder why the other 17 were "withheld" in the first place. What difference could it have made?
As Muckrock notes at the end of its piece:
Just GLOMAR us next time, IRS. Save us both a lot of grief, and it's a lot less cruel.
Does anyone have a good idea of what it is he was trying to get information about, based on the criteria specified in the article? Whatever it is, it looks like something interesting...
That One Other Not So Random Guy, 21 Jul 2015 @ 2:15pm
That seems a bit strange for a response to a FOIA request, since whatever is being delivered is supposed to be public, but whatever.
I work in the health industry now and all our FOIA's, when seeking info on Medicare issues for example, come on a disk with a password protected .zip file, with a follow up letter with the password. All of them. Someone deemed there to be personal info or maybe just was not trained properly and is treating all FOIA's the same.
As far as giving someone all redacted pages... welcome to Merika, now go away.
Actually, it's good protocol: All data on media that are to be taken off site must be encrypted, with keys transferred separately. If you leave it to the discretion of staff, there will be times when they get it wrong, and fail to encrypt sensitive data.
I don't think the files were redacted so much as created. The whole pdf file was 5kB, which leads me to believe they just created a pdf file with a black background and the USC text they added.
The requester should sue for failure to fulfill the FOIA request as the IRS did not return any documents...they merely created fake documents.
Kind of like that FBI drone assessment where they redacted everything except the cover page, and then a couple of years later denied that the document even existed.
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good idea...
:)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That seems a bit strange for a response to a FOIA request, since whatever is being delivered is supposed to be public, but whatever.
As far as giving someone all redacted pages... welcome to Merika, now go away.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good protocol
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not even redacted documents...these are fake
The requester should sue for failure to fulfill the FOIA request as the IRS did not return any documents...they merely created fake documents.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not even redacted documents...these are fake
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not even redacted documents...these are fake
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
FBI Drone Impact Assessment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The real question
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]