Australian Police Raid Bookseller Over Copies Of A Book First Published 24 Years Ago
from the thus-transferring-legitimacy-to-a-single-citizen's-complaint dept
Considering the sort of potentially-offensive content the average Internet holds, it's almost charmingly quaint when this sort of thing happens.
Mr Lake said the police were very gentle when they arrived and asked that the book be removed from the shelf.Mr. Lake runs Imprints Booksellers in Adelaide, Australia. The book at the center of the "gentle" raid was originally published 24 years ago.
[American Psycho], by American author Bret Easton Ellis, has been classified R18 under national censorship legislation since its release in 1991, requiring it to be sold in plastic and only to those aged over 18.So, what happened? Two things. First, a new edition was published featuring a foreword by Irvine Welsh -- someone who's no stranger to plumbing the depths of humanity. This edition -- which arrived roughly 24 years after the original classification and sans the sealed plastic covering -- was noticed by a local citizen, who then got her third-party outrage on.
He said the raid occurred because somebody complained to police after reading in a weekend newspaper column that the book was being sold by bookshops without plastic wrapping.As per usual, it's the squeaky busybody that gets the grease, despite the book being a good couple of decades past the point of its original outrage and being surpassed in terms of graphic violence several times over, including in plenty of unwrapped books sold by the same booksellers.
"I had a phone call from a lady on Tuesday who was quite aggressive and questioned why we were selling this classified product out of its wrapper," he said.
Music (mostly) blog The Quietus has probably the best description of what likely went down in the this "gentle raid" over the most shocking novel of the early '90s.
Imprint Books in Adelaide (AUS) was ‘gently raided’ by – some apparently very polite, possibly even contrite, hopefully totally fucking embarrassed – police officers for displaying unsealed copies of Bret Easton Ellis’ 1991 satirical (adjective: sarcastic, critical, and mocking another's weaknesses) novel American Psycho.Now, while Australia -- a nation of adults constantly being treated like children (and paying far too much for the "privilege"…) by their government -- has earned a reputation as a busybody in its own right, it's highly doubtful these police officers were very thrilled with this assignment. But ignoring the complaint was likely out of the question. Anyone sufficiently motivated to ring up both the bookshop and the cops because of something they read in the newspaper is the sort of person who won't let the issue go until it's been resolved to their satisfaction. So, rather than just blow off the misplaced concern, they apologetically and gently "raided" the bookseller. No doubt this was followed by a surreptitious reconnaissance mission by the complainer to verify that the complainee had been sufficiently cowed.
As for the bookseller, he made the sort of assumption anyone would make when the latest edition of a 24-year-old novel arrived without the protective R18 shrinkwrap.
"We just assumed the classification has been lifted," he said.Because that would make sense. But no, the R18 is still in place and people with nothing better to do but read newspapers and make angry phone calls will continue to put local law enforcers in an unenviable position: Do you raid the bookshop and look foolish? Or do you answer call after call from aggrieved locals until you finally decide to raid the bookshop and look foolish? When your choices are this awful, the best course of action is to just get it over with.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: american psycho, australia, books, bret easton ellis, free speech, offensive content, raids
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
It is also the sort of person that supports such kind of censorship and the law by itself without critical thinking. It's the sort of person that makes the lives of parents and kids alike hell just because they think they saw the kids out unsupervised. That the poor are poor because they are lazy. That providing affordable health for everyone is Communism or something. Etc etc etc.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
No, that's how American police would handle it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
After that we would file a lawsuit against the assets themselves so the police can keep it all under the asset forfieture laws.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On the upside
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Or the type of informant that got hundreds of people killed when rounded up to be purged by their government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hang on, Hang on
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hang on, Hang on
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So?
Did they take the book out into the street for a public burning?
Did they follow up with the complainant and do a psychological assessment to determine if she needed to be taken away or given a position with customs and excise?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I want to see this happen...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Credit to the Australian cops on this one
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It must be so wonderful to have so much free time at her disposal to monitor such a deep, pressing issue, where children, nay, the entire Australian society faces collapse due to a piece of missing cellophane.
I mean, we need to support the plastic wrap industry, right? If books aren't wrapped in plastic wrap, then jobs are lost, poverty ensues, radical Islam takes hold, and the terrorists win.
I hope this fine upstanding bastion of society truly understands her role in making not only Australia safer, but the entire world safer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I bet they'd sell pretty fast then :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Any country on Earth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
While in the US
Not to mention the thousands of $ for overtime.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Though QLD is a strange fucking wacked out place. Sorta like Florida with bits of Texas thrown in.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Aussies seem like great people but the stress from a land that is out to murder you in any way possible causes some people like this lady to go a little nutty is the only thing I can think of for some of the ridiculous things i hear coming from down there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Watching the stuff-ups made in Queensland over the years, I have observed that both NSW and Vic both have a mentality of laughing at QLD and then saying that the situation being laughed at could NEVER happen in either of these states. Then a number of years later, even worse happens in NSW and Vic.
Queensland does get its dopey pollies, but NSW and Vic get much more corrupt and dopey pollies.
It's like the old gerrymander that happened in QLD - it was always attributed to Old Joh, but the reality it that it was set up by the Labour Party and when the workers migrated from the country to Brisbane, it left the conservatives behind and this changed the balance of power.
I still remember the shenanigans that went on in the financial systems in QLD in the 70's and the NSW and Vic pollies saying it would NEVER happen in their states and then in the 80's, an even bigger messup happened in Vic with the State Bank and other Building Societies. I was one of the lucky one that had transferred all of my accounts out of the local banking system into the major national banks.
I was told 6 months before it hit the fan that trouble was coming and to move my funds, so I did. I managed to not lose anything, but I know of people who lost much.
NSW is known for its corrupt politicians and dubious police. Vic is known for its incompetent politicians and its religious love of Aussie Rules football teams. NT is known for it boozing, SA for its incomprehensible idiocy. QLD for its backwardness. WA for its remoteness.
But the full reality, despite the pollies and other difficulties, this is still the greatest nation on earth and the best place to live bar none.
Once this land gets into your blood, there is no other place on earth to call home.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When I read that these guys had been busted for it, I guessed that the censorship dinosaurs went back to the original classification rules from '84, & used that as their excuse to satisfy the puritans who reported it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]