Amazon Bans Sale Of Competing Apple TV, Chromecast Devices To 'Avoid Customer Confusion'
from the heaping-piles-of-bullshit dept
Amazon has come up with a rather ingenious way to give its own Fire TV streaming video devices a leg up in the market place: stop selling major competing products. In a letter sent this week to the company's marketplace sellers, Amazon announced that it would no longer be allowing new listings for either the Chromecast or Apple TV starting today, and that existing retail stock of both products would be discontinued at the end of the month. Google of course just unveiled two new versions of the Chromecast, which has been historically outselling Amazon's own streaming devices.Amusingly, Amazon unloads what has to be one of the larger piles of ambiguous bullshit in defense of an anti-competitive position seen in some time:
"Over the last three years, Prime Video has become an important part of Prime," Amazon said in the e-mail. "It’s important that the streaming media players we sell interact well with Prime Video in order to avoid customer confusion."Hilarious. Except it's up to developers to embed Chromecast support into their services and apps, and both Google and Apple publish open software development kits that allows any application to be utilized on both devices. In other words, it's Amazon's choice that Chromecast and Apple TV won't play nicely with Amazon Prime Instant Streaming. It has nothing to do with the devices not "interacting well" with Amazon's services. Bloomberg even helps prop up this nonsensical explanation further by repeating the idea that Prime Video "doesn’t run easily on rival’s devices."
Meanwhile, on what planet exactly are you "avoiding customer confusion" by suddenly removing access to hugely popular, competing products?
Apparently other streaming competitors like the Roku and game consoles have yet to see Amazon's ire and will remain sold, for now. Obviously none of this is the end of the world, since Amazon controls just 1% of the overall retail market and these devices can be bought at a long-list of retail alternatives, including Apple and Google themselves. Still it's an utterly-idiotic decision that's sure to invite antitrust scrutiny at worst, and an absolute shit storm of negative PR at best.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: amazon fire, apple tv, chromecast, competition, devices, streaming
Companies: amazon, apple, google
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I'm confused.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What about smart tvs?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What about smart tvs?
That "smart" part of the TV will be obsolete in three years. While the TV part of it will be good for ten years.
Within three years the terms of service on that "smart" part of the TV will change without consulting you.
I like to get my set top box from where I choose, independently of the TV. I can easily replace the cheap set top box if it becomes hostile to use.
Finally, relevant to this topic, the way the "smart" players are playing does not give me confidence yet that I'm willing to commit to a long term set top box -- especially one built in to the TV -- that might be spying on me, if not today, then in a few years from now.
What if the maker of my Smart TV decides not to let me watch programs on internet service X or Y?
I'll just take a "dumb" TV with a large order of HDMI inputs please.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: What about smart tvs?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Game consoles should be fine.
If I read it correctly, they're not carrying devices that don't work with their service. I watch Amazon Video on my Xbox just fine. And going by Roku's website, Amazon Video works there, too. So they wouldn't block those for that reason.
Does it mean they could decide to drop products that also support competitors (regardless of whether they also support Amazon Video)? That would be a bigger can of worms.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
really..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: really..
The DreadPirateRoberts already tried that.
Did not go well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: really..
They can also stop other people from selling their stock through Amazon, because reasons.
They can also be called out on their bullshit, whether they stock a competitive product or not. People may also freely analyze and comment on stupid business practices. I know these concepts are extremely new and disruptive, as is publishing such commentary, but in time the world will grow accustomed to it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: really..
But one reason Amazon has been one of the first places I go to is because they carry just about anything and everything under the sun.
Now I suddenly have to do a double take and have second thoughts about anything I might buy on Amazon. Is Amazon trying to lure me into something and not show me all of the options.
I used to trust Amazon. Now I don't. Wow that was quick.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: really..
Trust is hard to build. Easy to lose.
See: Facebook
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: really..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: really..
When large, influential companies lie to the public about the reasons for their commercial decisions, people should care. Amazon can stock and sell whatever they choose as you say, but they can't falsly claim it's for their customers' benefit and expect not to be called on it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: really..
Problem?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And kangaroo Amazon just pulled a knife.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A strange metamorphosis.
Pretending that Apple is anything like that is a bit silly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm not sure I'd trust Google or Apple to be open with Amazon about how to best support streaming video plus the Amazon user interface. There are all kinds of ways of being obstructionist in software support.
But how does it matter? If I wanted to buy AppleTV I'd be on the Apple site. Same for Chromecast. Because that way if the product failed to work I'd expect to have an easier time organizing a refund or getting troubleshooting help.
I don't see the fuss.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Umm... it was for a friend. Yeah, that's it.
That's one of the great things about Amazon. It has great returns. Apple's returns suck in comparison. Been there, done that. Wouldn't do it again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Are Google and Apple retailers for anyone else's products? Is this apple indeed an orange?
"But how does it matter? If I wanted to buy AppleTV I'd be on the Apple site. Same for Chromecast."
But what if you don't know which one you want, and you'd like to be able to compare them before purchase? Most consumers often aren't tech savvy enough to know. So, if they normally use Amazon for purchases, they'll default to Amazon's products even more than they used to now that they have to go somewhere else to check out competitors.
"I don't see the fuss."
Because you choose not to, or you're using one of those "it doesn't bother me personally therefore it doesn't matter to anyone" fallacies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Amazon is for people who refuse to shop around for the best price.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google drops Amazon search hits
The reason Google became the synonym for web-searching is because they would include everything and organize it according to what you were most likely to want.
At the point they stop including everything, they cease becoming the go-to search engine.
Already they're losing that position due to their decision to omit torrent sites, alleged hate sites and sites related to contraband (generally for purposes of legal self defense, but it is still impacting their userbase).
So yeah, Amazon being petty is a good reason for Google to not respond in kind.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Google drops Amazon search hits
At the point they stop including everything, they cease becoming the go-to marketplace.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
FireTV
It doesn't take a genius to realise they're just trying to sell me crap I don't want, so I cancelled my subscription. I know when I'm being sold shite and Amazon can fuck right off.
This appears to be more of the same. All it does is prove beyond a doubt that FireTV is unmarketable bollocks that nobody wants.
Fuck off, Amazon, we're not that stupid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: FireTV
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Admission that they are crap
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Admission that they are crap
(still, lacking NTFS support is BS).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stopping customer service
But there have been a few times when it hasn't worked, so I called Amazon. Their stock response was that they support AppleTV... yet they support the iPhone which can play video *over* AppleTV. Basically, their customer service rep was helpless to figure out a solution.
I then did the usual: I unplugged the AppleTV unit, plugged it back in, and then it worked fine.
So if Amazon doesn't sell AppleTV, they can punt the question and tell people to talk to Apple... who will tell them to to talk to Amazon about Prime Video... and back and forth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And so I, the end user, am to assume...
Smells like Bing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: And so I, the end user, am to assume...
Excellent point. I interpreted the absurd Bing lock-in that Windows 10 engages in as a frank admission that Bing is failing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hahahaha!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hahahaha!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yep, so this is where you do what Netflix, Hulu, etc. do and develop apps for all major OSes to enable this... Especially since many people will be buying the new devices for those devices first and for the services they support second.
It's also worth noting that Apple TVs have not had an app store before the new edition. They had no problem selling devices they literally could not add functionality to without working with Apple on the next iOS update, but now it's a problem when they could make an app themselves. Interesting...
"Bloomberg even helps prop up this nonsensical explanation further by repeating the idea that Prime Video "doesn’t run easily on rival’s devices." "
Funny... I know people who seem to be running an Android app for the UK service quite fine on their Google tablets. I wonder what's stopping them from letting Chromecast be able to access this since their own product is also Android based.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Once the holidays are over (wife wants the two-day shipping during present buying), we're canceling Amazon Prime.
It's just too damn confusing to know why a retailer don't want to retail.
I don't want to shop at a store who blocks products on a "just because" basis.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Well, that part's easy. They stopped being a pure retailer a long time ago and are now a hardware manufacturer, software developer and subscription service provider along with their retail duties.
They've simply decided that the money to be gained from greater sales elsewhere is likely to be higher than the loss of reputation and customers that this causes in their retail sales.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In other *shocking* news ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: In other *shocking* news ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Analogy for this
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not as bogus as you think
This isn't as bogus as you think, Mike. Amazon's DRM uses Flash and Chromecast and AppleTV keep refusing to add it at Amazon's request, because they know Flash is horrible and want it to die.
So there is some truth to that part of the story. Of course, Amazon could write another different DRM for those two devices, just like Google has supported Flash, MP4 and VP8/9 for YouTube videos.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not as bogus as you think
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not as bogus as you think
The fact that other manufacturers refuse to compromise the stability and security of their own devices to make Amazon's life easier is hardly a negative point against anyone other than Amazon. It might not be their fault that content providers insist on DRM, but it's their decision as to how it was to be implemented.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Prime Video Is False To Amazon's Higher Values
My sister agreed to place orders on my behalf, on her Apple I-thingy. So I click through the Amazon website on a non-logged-in basis, collect URL's, and send them in an e-mail to my sister, who puts in the order for such mundane articles as office (desktop) computer parts, plastic forks, and bathroom scrubbing brushes. Of course, Amazon may decide to make it impossible to place an order on an Apple I-thingy. I came up with the work-around because, even though Amazon had done some stupid things, I still felt they were worth salvaging. My attitude is:
"Bad Amazon! Bad! Bad Dog! Baaad! Bad Jeff Bezos! Bad. Baaad!"
What I want from Amazon, first and foremost, is an efficient means of purchasing used/remaindered/distressed stuff, primarily books, but, secondarily, certain types of computer items where compatibility is the main issue (eg. printers), and I affirmatively want something manufactured ten years ago. Beyond that, I want something pretty much equivalent to Target, which doesn't involve three hours and a forty-dollar taxicab fare to get a hundred dollars worth of household sundries. I used to buy computer stuff from Tiger Direct and Cyberguys, over the telephone, but I now get things from Amazon, instead of going on to NewEgg, because I am not really pushing the limits on computers anymore. I am now getting basic computer supplies like blank CD's and DVD's, memory sticks, and printer paper at the Walgreen's on the corner.
There are some rather weird specialty items, like egg powder, which is practically a Mormon religious item. The Latter-Day-Saints are supposed to keep a year's supply of food on hand, as a memory of the time when they were penniless fugitives, the time of Nauvoo. Of course in Brigham Young's day, self-sufficiency meant having a cow and a chicken coop, like everyone else. In a nineteenth-century city like Detroit or Chicago, every moderately prosperous Irish or Polish workingman had a vegetable garden, and a cow, and a chicken coop, and a pig to eat up the kitchen garbage and turn it into ham and bacon. The livestock provided fertilizer for the vegetable garden. That was simply practical economics. The kind of people who bought fresh groceries at the store were the kind of people who employed servants to clean their houses, do their cooking, and look after their children. The Mormon difference consisted in keeping enough grain on hand to feed the beasts for a year. With the transition from rural to suburban living, where everyone started to live like the upper classes, only with machines instead of servants, the Mormons have re-interpreted the obligation of maintaining a year's food supply to mean keeping supplies of powdered milk and powdered eggs, along with the more usual canned goods. You can get powdered milk in any grocery store, but you can't get powdered eggs so easily. By force of circumstance, powdered eggs have come to symbolize the Mormon willingness to move out into the wilderness to worship in their own way.
All religions have food rites or food restrictions. Food is so basic an experience that no religion can avoid it. So there are companies in Utah which produce powdered eggs, and sell them through local stores in Utah, and traditionally sold them mail-order via church newspapers, and now, of course, by Amazon. It works more or less the same way as Kosher food. The iconic piece of Kosher food is a piece of Matzoh bread. Same principle. I get most of my spices from a mail order firm down in Texas, but down there, they are probably Baptists. Baptists and Mormons _really_ don't get on. Before 9/11, cases of religious discrimination, forced indoctrination in the public schools, etc., practically always turned out to be Baptist vs. Mormon. The result is that the spice company in Texas, which carries some very obscure items such as powdered tomato, not to mention dozens of blended spice mixes from various parts of Asia, does not want to carry powdered eggs.
In a way, I think that the powdered eggs represent Amazon at its best, rather like a United States Postman carrying ten different magazines in his satchel, all ideologically incompatible with each other, and delivering all these magazines to their respective subscribers, without fear or favor. Amazon took the view that, obviously, powdered eggs are wholesome food. They won't hurt anyone. They are good for children, so Amazon doesn't have to collect IDs, the way it would have to do for tobacco or booze. The powdered eggs fall within Amazon's normal economic shipment parameters, the same as spices or coffee, so there isn't going to be a problem with stuff getting damaged in transit. Therefore it is none of Amazon's business how people use powdered eggs in religious rites and sacraments, or what the food is believed to symbolize.
The new emphasis on Walled Garden entertainment media represents a turning away from this kind of value. The written word has always been democratic. Anyone willing to spend the time has always been able to write a book. In recent years, the internet and websites have made it highly practical to publish and distribute a book without money changing hands. With so many people willing to give their books away, book-selling is ultimately a doomed enterprise. Amazon is moving away from that, towards the idea that it should expensively produce its own television shows, which everyone who wants to shop at Amazon will be expected to watch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wow, that IS some transparent bullshit excuse for them to only sell their own device
This sets a precedence, ban this today, what will they ban tommorow......they need to rethink their stance on just what should, be a good reason to ban a selling item
From a prime member, how long.....we'll see
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
O'Riley Books too...
I am done with Amazon. It's jumped the shark.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]