As Predicted: Encryption Haters Are Already Blaming Snowden (?!?) For The Paris Attacks
from the shut-up dept
It really was less than two months ago that we noted that, having lost the immediate battle for US legislation to backdoor encryption, those in the intelligence community knew they just needed to bide their time until the next big terrorist attack. Here was the quote from Robert Litt -- the top lawyer for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence from September:Although “the legislative environment is very hostile today,” the intelligence community’s top lawyer, Robert S. Litt, said to colleagues in an August e-mail, which was obtained by The Post, “it could turn in the event of a terrorist attack or criminal event where strong encryption can be shown to have hindered law enforcement.”Well, as you already know, on Friday there was a tragic and horrifying terrorist attack in France that killed over 100 people. And it took basically no time at all for defenders of the surveillance state to start... blaming Snowden and encryption? It started with the usual talking heads, such as former George W. Bush press secretary and current Fox News commentator, Dana Perino, who seriously seemed to blame Snowden for the attacks based on... who knows what.
Also, F Snowden. F him to you know where and back.
— Dana Perino (@DanaPerino) November 14, 2015if the attack was aided through "whistleblowers" leaking what the NSA cannot penetrate, will that be part of the movie?
— GregGutfeld (@greggutfeld) November 14, 2015The attackers are believed to have communicated using encryption technology, according to European officials who had been briefed on the investigation but were not authorized to speak publicly. It was not clear whether the encryption was part of widely used communications tools, like WhatsApp, which the authorities have a hard time monitoring, or something more elaborate. Intelligence officials have been pressing for more leeway to counter the growing use of encryption.Here's the link to that article, but as I type this, it now shows the following:
No matter what, the argument is pure bullshit. Of course they probably used encryption, because lots of people use encryption to communicate, and there's no way in hell that they suddenly decided to use encryption "because Snowden." As Glenn Greenwald has helpfully chronicled, the press has noted that terrorists have known to use encryption to avoid having their communications spied upon since before 9/11. Here's just one example in an article stuffed with many, many more:
The real point, though: if you want to communicate secretly, there is always some way to do it. To blame leaks from just a couple of years ago on the fact that people planning to commit mass murder try to communicate secretly is flat out ridiculous and is nothing more than fear mongering to score political points.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: backdoors, dana perino, ed snowden, encryption, going dark, greg gutfeld, isis, paris attack
Reader Comments
The First Word
“The attackers are believed to have communicated using encryption technology,
Citizens are believed to have communicated using encryption technology when checking their bank balances.Online shoppers are believed to have communicated using encryption technology when making purchaes online.
Gmail users are believed to have communicated using encryption technology when checking their email.
Yahoo! users are believed to have communicated using encryption technology when checking their email.
Grandma is believed to have communicated using encryption technology when talking to her grandchildren on FaceTime using her ipad
Techdirt readers are believed to have communicated using encryption technology when leaving this message.
You are believed to have communicated using encryption technology when reading this message.
Terrorists use propaganda, guns and bombs, so does the USA Government. The one closer to home terrorizes me more than the one in a desert on the other side of the planet.
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
When 'scum' just doesn't quite cut it...
— Dana Perino (@DanaPerino)
People are dead, and do they care? Do they offer sympathy to the friends and family of those that died? Hell no, screw them, it's time to use the opportunity to score some points! Who cares about corpses, there's soundbites to be made!
Too 'delicate' to spell out the word 'fuck', but they have no problem using the dead, and the pain and suffering of others for their own personal gain. Lovely sensibilities they've got there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: When 'scum' just doesn't quite cut it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: When 'scum' just doesn't quite cut it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: When 'scum' just doesn't quite cut it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: When 'scum' just doesn't quite cut it...
And these cunts have forgotten that they actually have a modicum of empathy for their fellow man and womman.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I mean, I suppose you could argue that if they weren't conducting indiscriminate spying on everyone, and only focused on those that have demonstrated actual ill-intent they might be able to focus their attention on real threats, instead of imaginary ones, but obviously that idea is just absurd, as the general populous isn't going to spy on itself.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Haystacks are to blame, not encryption
In short, if they build less haystacks and concentrate on looking into the right haystacks, they might have a chance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Haystacks are to blame, not encryption
A little knowledge of history might help - eg 13 Nov 1918
The fall of the Caliphate of the Ottoman Empire.
An obvious "hotspot" for Isis activity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Haystacks are to blame, not encryption
I don't think they know how to do that. Not being tongue in cheek, to me it really looks like all they know how to do is "collect it all" and then sit on it. And of course the FBI is good at creating terrorism plots. But finding actual terrorists? That seems to be beyond their capabilities.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Haystacks are to blame, not encryption
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Haystacks are to blame, not encryption
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Haystacks are to blame, not encryption
(Sorry, old joke, but disturbingly plausible.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Haystacks are to blame, not encryption
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Haystacks are to blame, not encryption
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Haystacks are to blame, not encryption
"Any exploit is a total exploit. The tiniest crack becomes a flood." said by Finch, when his partner wanted to build a backdoor into the machine before it went online.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Haystacks are to blame, not encryption
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
(see James "What does a guy have to do, publish a book?" Risen)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Intelligence agencies and their pawns circling the carrion
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Encryption IS to blame
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Encryption IS to blame
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Encryption IS to blame
Just to make things worse the order of it is scrambled - it is not even roughly chronological. A decoded version is here.
http://www.koran-at-a-glance.com/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Encryption IS to blame
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let's review, briefly
14 years with trillions of dollars in intelligence spending
14 years with trillions of dollars in military spending
14 years of torture and kidnapping
14 years of drone strikes
14 years of Guantanamo
14 years of crushed civil liberties
14 years of massive profits for defense/security contractors
And yet the western world's intelligence forces were unable to detect and prevent a poorly-planned and ineffective attack carried out by under-equipped amateurs. (If they were professional soldiers, heavily-armed, and better organized, then there would be thousands dead, not hundreds.)
Of course those on whose watch this happened will never, ever, EVER admit that this happened because they failed. Again. Instead they'll redouble their efforts toward the same tactics...never realizing and certainly never wanting to admit that you cannot fight the symptoms of terrorism, you must address its root causes. And in this case, sadly, the root causes trace back to the manipulation of the Middle East by western governments for their own ends. They created this monster and only now are they beginning to understand that it can and will turn on its creators.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Let's review, briefly
I think they are aware of your interpretation here - and part of the reason for their failure is that it is also wrong (or at best only a fraction of the truth). To understand what is really going on one needs to go further back in time - much further.
Islam had a dynamic of violent conquest from day one (in their calendar,c620 in ours)
From that time till around 1700 the west mostly opposed this expansion. However at that time the Ottoman empire started to fall significantly behind the west( technically ) and ceased to be a significant threat. From then on various Western countries (notably Britain and France) started using the Ottomans as a pawn in their own games of power politics. Thus the "sick man of Europe" was propped up to prevent the expansion of Russia and, in its death throes was allowed to ethnically cleanse substantial proportions of its territory (only part of which constituted the Armenian Genocide). The resulting displacement of peoples added to the tensions of the region.
In the subsequent breakup of the empire artificial countries were created and when their initial (puppet) rulers became unpopular the memory of Ottoman failure was still alive and so they were overthrown by Arab nationalists (who looked to the west as a model) rather than Islamists.
Thus after the first world war the fundamentalist party within Islam slept - until it was woken by oil money in the 1970s. At that point the old 7th century version of Islam was promoted and the Arab nationalists were forced to become more and more draconian to keep the lid on it.
One by one they have fallen - and we have had the stupidity to indirectly assist this process -which I guess is your point. However I think it would have happened anyway.
Probably the worst mistakes were those of the 19th century. Russia should have been allowed to liberate the region from Ottoman rule and consequently there would be far less Islam in the region (and worldwide) now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Let's review, briefly
Such an expansion would have had little impact on Islam, as the Russian stans, (Kazakhstan,Kyrgyzstan,Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan) still have strong Muslim communities.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Let's review, briefly
But these mostly do not seem to have swallowed the Iskamist agenda to the same extent.
Also the region in question had a very different population profile in the 19th century from today.
Muslims may have ruled the Ottoman Empire but they were not the overwhlelming majority. Had other groups been empowered at the time then these regions would resemble more Bulgaria/ Romania.
There would be other consequences too.
Possibly Alaska would still be part of Russia (fallout from the Crimean war was part of the reason for the sale).
Also it would have upset the timeline of history leading to the assassination of Alexander II. If he had lived longer then reforms he had in train might well have averted the revolution.
Removal of the Ottomans from the equation might well have averted WW1 so all bets are off...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Let's review, briefly
The problem is that this happened not because they failed, but because they succeeded.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Let's review, briefly
I think they realize it completely. Fighting the symptoms is job security. Finding a cure is anathema to the need for organizational self-preservation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
by Encryption they probably mean French
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: by Encryption they probably mean French
s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: by Encryption they probably mean French
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ineffective how? They plan to seed fear among 'infidels'
and to make people be afraid they might be hit next whereever they are. Do you think the Paris attacks make this more or less likely?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
First, in a military one. Attempting to get a bomb into the soccer game via the security checkpoint was quite stupid, and it was only one of the tactical errors made. Competent military tacticians would have caught most or all of those errors during the planning stage.
Second, in a political one. Putin's statement of expressed cooperation was not something they wanted to provoke, as IS exists in the nebulous no-man's-land created by the disagreements of major powers. If those disagreements disappear, then so does the space for them to exist. I think this was a miscalculation on their part.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Exactly - unfortunately this has been true of Islam to some extent throughout it's history. It was born into the no man's land between the Byzantine and Persian empires survived the middle ages in the no- mans land between Eastern Orthodoxy and the Roman Catholics - spent the 19th century in the no-man's land between Britan, France and Russia and grew again in the no-man's land within the cold war!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not a double-standard at all
Maybe they're not.... Hypocritical US media assholes start looking kinda similar from a distance...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh it is encryption, because only bad people use encryption...
not people who live in actual dictatorships who will be murdered for expressing an unapproved idea
not people who live in 'Merika who have seen the special attention given to those who pretend they still have the rights we were given
not people who don't want to look like the morons at the CIA who keep classified documents on a fucking AOL account a high teenager can access
For every bit of privacy they have taken from all of us, despite all of the claims of keeping us safe...
THEY CAN'T DO WHAT THEY PROMISED, BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE!
Stop giving them air to suck up and spin to get more power.
Stop coddling citizens, the world is a scary place but you will NEVER be 100% safe.
Stop sowing more terror to gain more power, because you really are becoming those you claim hate us for our freedom... because you keep taking it away like they want to.
Something horrible happened in the world, and every second the media pays any attention to the spin is wasted.
We don't need to have the 3000000 word deep dig into those you think might have done it or why.
What we need is to be able to grieve for the loss of people taken in a pissing contest between 2 sides who just want more power for themselves not to keep the pawns in the game safe.
We are expendable if it gets them something more. They jumped on blaming everything but their own failure, only mentioning in passing (to frighten us small children) those people who died because the illusion of protection we gave our rights up for doesn't always work.
Oh encryption cause this!! Not our years of failed policies playing world police basing decisions on what pundits think is right, not informed people. We set these wheels in motion, and they are running at high speed. Perhaps we should consider our answers so far haven't been the right ones, and staying that course will result in more tragedy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Stop sowing more terror to gain more power
Exactly. Tony Balir passed a bill that outlawed "Glorification of Terrorism", blindly oblivious to the irony that this bill itself was the biggest piece of such glorification around!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Nicely said. I may quote you the next time I argue the 2nd.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Next level
Man- Hey babe, I am going to go drink a beer with my friends tonight, is that okay with you.
Woman- Of course my love, go have fun.
After sophisticated translation- Oh hell no, if he leaves I am going to be pissed off. How dare he even ask.
Now the computer is still struggling to piece the rest together, as it shows only 9% complete.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Maybe that's what she needs, but I wouldn't give her the pleasure.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
/Mike Logic
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
/Coward Logic
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
And "MATH" is great.
All of our enemies should use it all the time...
People should be able to help other people commit "MATH".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: [#30]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
What secrets did he reveal, other than that the NSA was spying on americans without warrants?
And encryption is great.
It is. And I assume you agree, seeing as you're posting anonymously.
All of our enemies should use it all the time.
No. Everyone should use it because it protects your privacy. Or are you willing to post your bank account info here?
Also, they should stop looking for that getaway driver from the Paris attacks.
Hello idiotic leap in logic.
People should be able to help other people commit crimes. It's the bestest thing, and it shouldn't be discouraged
Huh?
I don't believe in accomplice liability.
I do, so...
We should reward heroes like Snowden who give away our secrets and getaway drivers who help murderers. They're doing good work.
Get help.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Um, he revealed the extent to which the government monitors for terrorism. That info would be pretty handy, if you're a terrorist.
It is. And I assume you agree, seeing as you're posting anonymously.
So my choosing to post anonymously on your boards means that I think encryption is great? I don't see the connection. I think there are pros and cons to anonymity and encryption. You seem to think more is better.
No. Everyone should use it because it protects your privacy. Or are you willing to post your bank account info here?
Sure. It's Capital One Bank, account number 2044623568. Have at it. Again, though, you seem to think more privacy is better. I think there are pros and cons.
Hello idiotic leap in logic.
Nothing idiotic about it. In other contexts, you deplore third-party liability. Why wouldn't you deplore it here?
I do, so...
You do? Can you point to single time you agreed that someone other than the party directly committing the wrong should be held accountable?
Get help.
Just having some fun. You're the one supposedly with the abundance of ideas, even though you have a very closed mind about so many things.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Umm, you forgot to post the details: Full name, billing address, associated SSN, PIN, etc.
Anxiously awaiting the details, provided you aren't full of shit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Anxiously awaiting the details, provided you aren't full of shit.
You're missing the point. Just because some privacy is good, that doesn't mean more privacy is always better. Mike sees things in black and white, when reality is much more gray.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Oh, I see. Kind of like "My privacy is good. Yours is not." Thanks for clearing that up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
S/He was just reflecting the approach of governments to privacy, its just they use state secrets to protect their privacy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Horrible analogy. In order for the getaway driver to be legally liable, they have to know they're helping a criminal of some sort escape from the law. What you folks want is to convict and imprison unknowing cab drivers for giving a criminal a ride.
What you copyright trolls don't understand is that the rest of humanity and the Internet ought to have no obligation, legal or moral, to police your precious state-granted monopolies (copyrights) for you. So get off our lawn.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
To the NSA/FBI calling for backdoors, are you going to also require that backdoors be put into key US Govt/Mil communications? If you've answered no, then you have to ask yourselves why are you better than everyone else? Does China have a giant backdoor in their Great Firewall? Again, you have to ask yourselves, "Why don't they do this?" if it is so great?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Congratulations on your fail!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Name the time and place.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
volkswagen does selling getaway cars
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Snowden didn't allow fake refugees into France;
Ask Rob Lowe said, NOW Hollande closes the border?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
George Soros financed the European Invaders
George Soros probably financed Missouri.
George Soros owes REPARATIONS.
Those who ENABLED these INVADERS to flood in must pay reparations to the Families and Survivors. Start with George Soros' wealth, then Merkel, and go on down the line. The INVADER ENABLERS committed these acts BY PROXY and must pay FULL REPARATIONS. They must pay for the costs of policing and controlling THEIR AGENTS , feeding, housing, clothing, and REPATRIATING the invaders.
Jewish Billionaire George Soros has confirmed he wants to bring down Europe’s borders, following the accusation made last week by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban. “This invasion is driven, on the one hand, by people smugglers, and on the other by those (human rights) activists who support everything that weakens the nation-state,” Mr Orban said. Mr Soros has now issued an email statement to Bloomberg Business, claiming his foundations help “uphold European values”, while Mr Oban’s actions in strengthening the Hungarian border and stopping a huge migrant influx “undermine those values.” “His plan treats the protection of national borders as the objective and the refugees as an obstacle,” Mr Soros added. “Our plan treats the protection of refugees as the objective and national borders as the obstacle.” Already Israeli businessman are buying up land in northern Iraq, where ISIS(rael) has depopulated an entire region, overwhelming Europe with refugees in the process.
Soros, a WWII Nazi COLLABORATOR, has been spreading TEARS and CHAOS through his financing of "color" revolutions, and his financing of race riots in America starting with Ferguson. Soros owes REPARATIONS globally.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: william on Nov 16th, 2015 @ 6:26am
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Looking for terrorists under lampposts,
Decrypting iPhones & emails is completely useless when ISIS is using Playstations to communicate.
These "intelligence" agencies are destroying the Fourth Amendment, with ZERO improvement in security.
But then, these agencies were never serious about looking for terrorists UNLESS they were under lampposts. They want to show some 'stats', and it's easier to run up stats with dumb terrorists than with smart terrorists.
Or, in the case of the FBI, they simply MANUFACTURE terrorists out of 80-IQ dimwits in order to run up their stats.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Looking for terrorists under lampposts,
The security they are working to improve is their own, at the cost of everyone else's.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/11/ex-cia-director-bush-ignored-months-of-warnings-about-911-to-avoid-l eaving-paper-trail-of-culpability/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Facebook 'safety check' to be used for terrorist comms
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Obviously the Paris terrorist attacks, and terrorism as a whole, are due to copyright.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
No, no, no. Copyright "violations"!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here's a car analopy: we could set speed limits to 20 mph on every road in the US and save 30,000 lives every year. Far more than we would save if every terrorist plat were thwarted. But we don't do it because we value efficient travel more than those 30,000 lives.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Nothing at all. It's an honest argument.Freedom has a price. In some cases the price is in blood. The goal of terrorism is and always has been, to destroy freedom. Every time we take away freedoms to combat terrorism we are advancing their cause. Politicians love to ride these types of tragedy's to push their agenda's. Gun control, encryption, whatever. It's an opportunity to advance their cause...
The only people not using these types of tragedies to push an agenda are the victims.
"You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before." - Rahm Emanuel"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Actually, that's probably wrong. Lacking decent security on the internet would make it easier for terrorists to compromise computer systems - and this would probably help them more than being able to communicate on encrypted channels on the internet.
we could set speed limits to 20 mph on every road in the US and save 30,000 lives every year
And I am sorry, while I agree with what I think is your point, this has been repeatedly debunked. There is not even a decent correlation in the reduction of speed limits and the reduction of deaths by car accidents.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Then substitute "mandate 20mph governors on cars" for "set speed limits to 20mph on every road".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
lol?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: cost/benefit analysis
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: cost/benefit analysis
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thought of the Day.
"I bet those bad people ate breakfast, So we should blame breakfast!"
or
"Damn that Wiley Coyote showed them how to make bombs, So we should blame cartoons!"
Blame everyone and everything for the attacks but the people who did the attacks. Makes sense to me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
srynas
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Among other things
Blinds
Closed windows
Doors
Walls
The ability to talk face to face without someone listening in
Whispering
Hand delivered letters
Privacy in general
Languages that aren't understood by police in the area
The lack of a police officer and/or camera and microphone in every room of every house and building
Laws (theoretically) protecting the right to privacy
...
With so many things getting in the way of their ability to monitor crime and/or 'terrorism', it's a wonder they can solve any crimes at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Among other things
The wearing of the bodycam will be mandatory (except for law enforcement/government officials) your cam will be issued at birth and all recordings will be sent without using encryption on a daily basis for review.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: srynas
That's a legitimate complaint. It's not his job to judge whether or not the positives outweigh the negatives, just to advocate for what he needs to do his job better.
Putting the guy on tv is probably a good move for Fox as well. Their viewership numbers are doing well, and in times of crisis, does even better. A police chief talking about all the things that make their jobs difficult is interesting.
It wouldn't surprise me if in the Fox forums there is somebody pointing out that on Techdirt, contributors are advocating for strong encryption to be left in the hands of evil people and no article writers are providing balance.
I like the Techdirt echo chamber and other people like Fox's echo chamber.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: srynas
Depends on what exactly he thinks his job is, or what he believes to have higher priority. If it's 'stopping criminals and solving crimes' then yes, it makes perfect sense for him to argue against encryption, as encryption can indeed make those two things more difficult.
On the other hand if it's 'protecting the public' then arguing against encryption is counter-productive, as he's arguing against something that protects the public by making it more difficult for would-be-criminals to commit crimes.
Solving a crime is well and good, but preventing it from ever happening in the first place is far better.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: srynas
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: srynas
You know what else reduces crime? Wholesale slaughters of populations. No people = no crimes. Now, on that basis, maybe you would also argue that it would be perfectly legitimate for law enforcement officials to call for genocide. I would say that you're a sociopath.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: srynas
Picking on one, the inability to read peoples electronic messages at will is just lazy, pandering to whatever is "on message" that week in law enforcement. What, is enforcing peoples privacy not in his job description?
This is a clown, in a uniform. Wearing a badge of authority.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I haven't heard the criminals complain about going dark.
Why don't we simply fire all the FBI people & hire the cryptolocker folks instead?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The attackers are believed to have communicated using encryption technology,
Online shoppers are believed to have communicated using encryption technology when making purchaes online.
Gmail users are believed to have communicated using encryption technology when checking their email.
Yahoo! users are believed to have communicated using encryption technology when checking their email.
Grandma is believed to have communicated using encryption technology when talking to her grandchildren on FaceTime using her ipad
Techdirt readers are believed to have communicated using encryption technology when leaving this message.
You are believed to have communicated using encryption technology when reading this message.
Terrorists use propaganda, guns and bombs, so does the USA Government. The one closer to home terrorizes me more than the one in a desert on the other side of the planet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The attackers are believed to have communicated using encryption technology,
Completely agree. I worry about terrorist as much as I worry about getting struck by lighting. The US government on the other hand scares me far more. Terrorists have only been an excuse to extend their control far beyond what it is supposed to be.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Would it have made a difference?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What you never hear in these debates
They haven't even intercepted their comms, and if they did, they were either able to decrypt it, or it was already in cleartext.
Now, I'm not saying that the intelligence community is useless, but there's a job they should be doing and they're not doing it despite being given nearly every resource they could possibly dream of having.
But, to them, clearly the answer is to be given more power and resources. The tunnel vision is strong with this one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I actually started using a VPN just a couple of years ago, fwiw. My reason wasn't to hide illegal downloads, though it does occasionally do this for me. No, it was because the powers that be were abusing the law and civil rights in ways they were never meant to be and that really pissed me off (thank you Snowden!).
I always encrypt all of my hard drives too, not because I have anything to hide, but because I live in a pretty bad neighborhood where theft is a real concern. I'm not worried so much about my passwords since those are encrypted too, but the idea of some stranger looking at my photos and what not? That creeps me out lol.
I guess my point is that using encryption doesn't automatically equate to someone being a "bad guy". There are plenty of legitimate reasons for using it beyond just banking and shopping. And even if the powers that be did find a way to force programmers to adopt their whole "backdoors for law enforcement purposes only" concept (what a joke), evildoers would simply resort to writing their own software.
PS: Can't wait to see law enforcement flip out when quantum entanglement becomes the communications norm. Good luck tapping that shit lol.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Law enforcement says "the terrorists used privacy to conceal their communications from us", with the implication being that therefore something needs to be done about privacy so terrorists can't use it anymore.
When put that way, it's obviously outrageous, because clearly they can't remove terrorists' privacy without removing everyone's. For some reason it's not as obvious to everyone that encryption, as a type of privacy, is exactly the same.
I can't claim any of this as my original thinking, just something I was thinking about the other day listening to one of these law enforcement people talking about this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
That is a great way of looking at it. I'll have to remember to use this most excellent line of reasoning the next time I have to deal with someone who doesn't get it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Terrorism fuels the engines of the surveillance state.
Can't provide evidence of efficacy; top secret stuff, you know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Turkey says it notified France twice about attacker
Turkey notified France twice in December 2014 and June 2015 about one of the attackers in suicide bombings and shootings in Paris that killed more than 130 people, a senior Turkish government official said on Monday.
Yes, by all means, blame Snowden.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Every damn time I hear these groups talk about LEGAL CIVIL TOOLS FOR PRIVACY they make it sound like every criminal had to log their plans with the local police department before carrying it out.
If you can't catch bad guys when they try to hide what they're doing, YOU CAN'T CATCH BAD GUYS! News flash! Criminals (yes, TERRORISTS are criminals. Screw the fear-logic terminology that has long since lost all meaning) try to be secretive!
If your only method of catching criminals is 'lets hope they are stupid enough to make it easy for us', get another job, and maybe we can finally find an agency willing to take it's role and responsibility seriously, and approach the problem in a realistic and meaningful manner.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How Very Convenient
Yes, Edward Snowden was responsible For The Paris Attacks.
The attacks had nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that Western governments have been humiliating, dehumanizing, bombing and controlling the resources of entire regions throughout the Middle East and Northern Africa for over 100 years.
It begins with the end World War I when the Ottoman Empire was forced by the Allied Powers as part of war reparations to sign the Treaty of Sevres in 1920 which began first with the partitioning and then total dissolution of the empire.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_S%C3%A8vres
Western control of the region mainly through mandates pronounced by both British/French governments over the succeeding years only served to entrench Western control often through indigenous bought and paid for satraps. This scheme is wholly responsible for the repression of entire generations of Middle Eastern and North African people who had almost no hope of casting off the repressive yolk of corrupt locals and power (oil) hungry Western sadists.
While it took only 20 years for the abusive allied friendly terms in the Treaty of Versailles to explode in Europe and usher in World War II the equally abusive terms of the Treaty of Sevres and British/French mandates took an additional 75 years boil over with the continued help of local despots and their Sadist Western partners (US included) to bring the region to a rapid boil.
So yes it is all Edward Snowdens fault.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Time to ban
Thanks
M.S.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Whatsapp belongs to facebook, another skynet facade,
therefore it must be 100% NSA compatible.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
something more elaborate like
an encrypted chat server
running on a stupid self erasing raspberry with no storage
through a very dark darknet (tor?)
with any common android chat client apps
that is not exactly elaborate, any kid can do something like that and have totally encrypted chat/voip conversation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And if they were on PS4?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: And if they were on PS4?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
duh!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The right tool for the job.
But with merely a few million US dollars sent to Saudi Arabia, for arms, the Five Eyes has put their best tool to its best use and in one foul swoop, put an end to many, many things that were causing it some grief, such as Syrian Immigrants, strong encryption, cyber-warfare, mass surveillance, and so much more.... which will now be demanded by the truly stupid people (republicans, racists, politicians, kings of industry, lords of the lands, police, etc.) of the USA, and allow the escalation of the Five Eyes base plan to enter stage three.
And as a bonus, they got to punish the French (fries) for all their refusals to be a team player and for continually refusing to pay their dues to the Five Eyes for protection against terrorist attacks.
Its gonna be a long memorable winter.
----
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The New World Order
The Surveillance State must ALWAYS fail to stop "terrorist" attacks, because "terrorist" attacks are the very thing that make the Surveillance State appear to be necessary to the terrified public.
Remove "terrorist" attacks and you remove the need for a Surveillance State.
Create "terrorist" attacks and you create the need for a Surveillance State.
----
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The New World Order
Real ones, at least. It's OK to stop fake ones that you create for your own purposes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The New World Order
As I said above.
"Create "terrorist" attacks and you create the need for a Surveillance State."
Stopping one of the fake "terrorist" attacks the FBI is so bad at constructing from whole cloth, is actually neither "stopping an attack" or "stopping a terrorist", since the victim of such phony FBI stings are usually brain damaged idiots and not in any way real terrorists, and the planned attack was entirely fictional and never intended to be carried out. Even the explosives are phony.
If the Five Eyes had not recruited mercenaries from all over the world to fill the ranks of ISIS for a publicly visible Saudi based Terrorist Army, the only terrorist attacks left would indeed be the ones manufactured by the FBI.
And since those are so obviously phony, nobody in the USA or anywhere else would be hiding under their bed any more.
By having its terrorist army murder lots of people in France, the Five Eyes have renewed the public terror level and created a situation where all of their planned global surveillance and crowd control operations will be instantly publicly approved, if not outright publicly demanded, for a while.
It was a superbly evil, but strategically timely move.
Truth is however, that the more often they do this sort of thing, the less time the effect of terror on the public will last, meaning that 5-Is will necessarily have to do this sort of thing more often, if they continue blowing up only non-Five Eyes nation's citizens.
Which is of course, the entire purpose of ISIS.
When ISIS begins using US-made drones to target churches and schools in the USA, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, and Britain, you will know that the Five Eyes has finally decided to drop the other shoe and put the world to war.
Considering the level of escalation that the France Bombing displays, this should likely not be too long from now.
After all, the old farts running the Five Eyes want very much to enjoy the fruits of their labors before they are too old to get it up any more.
You may want to get used to saying "Hail Hydra".
---
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Better watch that kinda talk there stranger.
Sentiments like that can get you a one way ticket on a CIA freight flight, to a small room in a small foreign country that considers torture to be pure spiritual joy, where members of your own government will gleefully pull off your fingernails and electrocute your genitals, with equipment your tax dollars paid for.
And if you think that a simple "anonymous" handle will keep the men and women of your government from discerning your true identity, using technology your tax dollars paid for, perhaps you would also like to purchase this lovely 500 acre estate/plantation I have for sale, in Florida....
---
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Snowden is part of the problem
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Snowden is part of the problem
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
movies for free
download OneBox HD app to watch latest movies for free. you can download the app from this URL - https://oneboxhdapp.com/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]