Redskins, Who Should Get To Keep Their Racist Name, Still Jerks For Running Fake Grassroots Support Website
from the jerkskins dept
As we've previously discussed the trademark issues surrounding the Washington Redskins team name, and as I've personally flip-flopped on the question like I was running for public office to represent salmon on a dry dock, none of that coverage has ever called into question that the team is run by some number of jackasses. Dan Snyder, who owns the team, has gone out of his way to attack all kinds of media and blogs over coverage of the team and its antics. Well, back on the name of the team, even if they got a big gift from a court in a related lawsuit, it turns out the team has been engaging in a bit of subterfuge to try to drum up support for the mascot as well.
But, thanks in part to an errant tweet, the team has been found out. Fans of the team and its name may recognize the Twitter account "Redskins Facts", which purports to be a grassroots conglomeration of fans that back the name of the team.
Redskins Facts is supposedly a grassroots organization aiming to create support for a mascot named after scalping Native Americans. However, it is run by a PR firm, not fans, and the team has carefully skirted around precisely designating it as independent. As SBNation points out, the Washington Post fact-checked the site’s claims and found them misleading.
While Washington was in a close game with Chicago, some suspicious tweeting went down. These two tweets, sent from two purportedly different organizations that have no affiliation with each other, look pretty similar. Given the exact similarities between the two tweets, this is almost certainly a copy/paste job.
— Dan Steinberg (@dcsportsbog) December 13, 2015
Oops. While many have long suspected that the PR firm running the Twitter account had been hired to do so by the team, because there isn't another logical explanation that would make any sense, this copy/paste job between the team's official account and the "Redskins Facts" account seems to confirm it quite nicely. The Redskins Facts website, indeed, has an entire "About Us" section that is nothing short of a series of misleading claims that would probably be more appropriately called lies.
So, even as the legal side of things is going to end up leaving the Redskins to trademark its dumb, racist team name, the fact that the team pulls these kinds of antics ought not be lost in the meantime.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: astrotufing, dan snyder, grassroots, pr, redskins, redskins facts, trademark
Companies: washington redskins
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The joke was right in front of you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
So everyone please stop talking about it! And don't ever bring it up again!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
USA used to be a fun place to live
No one was ever exempt, though some groups like the Poles seem to attract a bit more. In conclusion, you get more of what you dream about, and (less desirably) what you fear. Life goes where the thoughts guide it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
And when was this, exactly? Perhaps it was back in the good old days when men were men, women knew their place and white privilege was a way of life rather than a sad commentary. Amirite?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
No your a fucking retard. You know damn well what he's saying, your just twisting it around to appease your sense of entitlement you jackass. Anyone that uses sexism and/or racism as a weapon to further their entitlement mentality is just as bad as the racists themselves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
Exactly what was assumed to be granted without question?
Ad hom - acknowledgement that you have no argument.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
This comment suggest you are either offended, or are sympathizing with the people that are offended. Either way, your a fucking retard. Amirite?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
It may suggest many things to many people, apparently I was unclear in this matter.
You seem to be offended by the possibility of others being offended or even the possibility of someone understanding why others might be offended. I do not find your behavior offensive, a bit pathetic maybe, but not offensive.
On a side note, do you know what the word retarded means?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
It's obvious by your replies to the original poster that you're race baiting. Any normal non-retarded (learning impaired) person can see that the original poster was simply suggesting that all insults and "ribbing" are not necessarily racist or sexist simply because you take it that way. That people should not have to alter their speech and/or humor simply because someone is offended by it. That we should be leery of becoming a society of easily offended, political correct, overly-sensitive, pussies.
"On a side note, do you know what the word retarded means?"
I do. I'm using it as an euphemism in place of "Shit-for-Brains". Your petty ass attack on my grammar is an obvious attempt to deflect from the original issue, and is very troll-ish. Because your argument is childish, and pathetic, your grasping for a meaningful way to "get the upper hand". The problem with that is no one gives a fuck about your pathetic sensitivities and you just come across as a troll.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
You're ignorant of your own language.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
What are you? 12?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
Heh, talk about "ad hom".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
I still have a "Polish Coffee Mug" - the handle is on the inside!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
"Some of the early 20th century Polish jokes might have been told originally before World War II in disputed border-regions such as Silesia, suggesting that Polish jokes did not originate in Nazi Germany, but a lot earlier, as an outgrowth of regional jokes rooted in historical social class differences. Nonetheless, these jokes were later fuelled by ethnic slurs disseminated by German warlords and National Socialist propaganda that attempted to justify the Nazi crimes against ethnic Poles by presenting them as dirty and relegating them as inferior on the basis of not being German."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_joke
http://www.polamjournal.com/Library/Fighting_Defama tion/The_Origin_of_the_Polish_Joke/the_origin_of_the_polish_joke.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: USA used to be a fun place to live
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So...
Techdirt is just a euphemism that was intended to disparage tech workers as nothing but dirt! It is an insult to all technical personnel who work in the trenches helping ungrateful and ignorant people!
Sure some say dirt is a slang for news, but I choose to believe that the operators of this site really intend it to be disparaging and therefore I am offended!
Techdirt, if you really see redskins as an offensive term that needs to be changed then you should follow your own rules and change your name to something LESS OFFENSIVE TOO!!!
See there, anyone can act offended if they get stupid enough! Those JERKS are no different than YOU JERKS!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So...
Do you see the difference? If not, then that is part of the problem.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: So...
I'm personally ambivalent as to whether they change the name, so long as it's not due to government pressure.
It's very late right now, so maybe in the morning I'll consider whether my support of the right to anonymous speech trumps my dislike of a corporation using it to astroturf. Right now I can't decide.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: So...
Yes, exactly. I thought that was clear from the repeated times denoting the name as racist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mascot?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mascot?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mascot?
In the "exaggeration" part of being politically correct.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mascot?
The collected skins were often referred to as "Red Skins" and, while some etymologist disagree, many consider that the origin of the term. (http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/news/a29318/redskin-name-update/)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No One Has to Change any Names
The only thing that's changed is that Dan Snyder lost *protected* speech on an offensive term.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No One Has to Change any Names
Bull.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]