Pakistan Orders ISPs To Block 429,343 Websites Completely, Because There's Porn On The Internet
from the i'm-sure-all-have-been-carefully-reviewed dept
It appears that efforts to censor the internet globally continues to spread, with the latest being a report out of Pakistan that the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) has told ISPs that they need to start blocking an astounding 429,343 websites at the domain level as quickly as possible, following a Supreme Court order to the PTA about the evils of porn online.The move apparently follows a recent order by the Supreme Court wherein the telecom sector’s regulatory body had been asked to “take remedial steps to quantify the nefarious phenomenon of obscenity and pornography that has an imminent role to corrupt and vitiate the youth of Pakistan”.The order apparently was issued just a few weeks ago, which raises the question of how the PTA put together a list of so many domains so quickly... and how carefully that list has been vetted. The answer, of course, is that it hasn't been vetted. And that means that tons of perfectly legitimate content is about to get blocked in Pakistan. Remember, this is the same country that once blocked all of YouTube, and did so in a way that basically knocked Pakistan off the internet, while also blocking YouTube throughout many countries across Asia. Let's hope mistakes of that nature aren't made again.
PTA said it has decided to take pre-emptive measures to block such websites at the domain level to control dissemination of pornographic content through the internet as it provided ISPs with a list of 429,343 domains to be blocked on their respective networks.
Even so, it's pretty obvious that mistakes will be made. First, that list is going to include tons of sites that aren't pornography. Is there a way to appeal? Who knows! Second, it's likely that in the process of blocking "at the domain level" some may choose to block IP addresses of certain sites, not realizing that many IP addresses are shared among multiple domains, meaning that lots of other sites may get sucked up as well. And then there's the issue of what good will this do anyway. People who really want to access porn on the internet won't have trouble finding it. I'm pretty sure there are more than 429,343 websites with porn on the internet, and even if there weren't, I'm guessing that VPNs and proxies work just as well in Pakistan as they do elsewhere.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: censorship, dns blocking, free speech, pakistan, pornography, site blocking
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Wait!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Wait!
You can't forget TD!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Wait!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Wait!
My company now blocks Techdirt for reasons unknown. I use Tor to get around their filter.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Wait!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Wait!
4.2.93.43
4.29.3.43
4.29.34.3
42.9.3.43
42.9.34.3
42.93.4.3
And the President_of_the_National_Assembly_of_Thailand will be most annoyed as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Think of DNS as icing on the IP cake. You don't need to eat the icing to eat the cake. 31.192.117.132 will get you to pornhub.com even quicker than typing in its domain name address.
Blocking the IP addresses makes DNS irrelevant. A VPN should make that blocking irrelevant, unless they're going to build a wall that drops anything incoming from "bad" domains.
I wish prudes would clean up their own act before trying to save others from themselves. If Pakistani youth want to waste their time watching porn, you've got to wonder why. Perhaps they think what you're trying to sell them sucks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Oooooooh - look at those ankles - wank wank
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Either way, it's pretty overbearing and useless. People blocking at the domain level are open to people using alternative DNS services, and to those sites simply choosing an alternative address. Blocking IPs will be useless if the sites change provider, and block legitimate services either sharing the same public IP or who end up being issued the same IP previously used by one of these services.
In other words: politicians have ordered private industry to censor at their own great expense in a way that will do nothing to stop those who actually want to get at the content they're trying to ban, while also punishing a great number of innocent people and businesses. Par for the course, sadly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Information is Power
Two true facts are at play here:
Telecommunications, and the information it carries, is an anathema to the elite. (This fact led to Aaron Swartz' demise.)
You can't legislate morality, but morality laws are really good at removing any opposition to those in power.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Information is Power
Keep in mind that Pakistan, although secular in comparison to many other Islamic states, is based heavily on religious rule. Before people get too jumpy about me calling out Pakistan for being religiously oriented, I would point out that Islam is the official state religion of Pakistan and the country has the strictest blasphemy laws of any Muslim-majority country.
In what is essentially a theocracy in all but name you absolutely can legislate morality.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
It's not like these rules are hidden somewhere ... in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying ‘Beware of the Leopard.'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm Shocked!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
'Nuff said!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pakistan and Porn
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So where's the list?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So where's the list?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: So where's the list?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mistakes will be made
Who says they will be 'mistakes'?
A massive operation of blocking sites provides fantastic cover to 'accidentally' block things which are not part of the operation. (political speech)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mistakes will be made
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Mistakes will be made
Pakistan Intelligent Telecommunication Authority (PITA)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sure, we'll stop the internet from vitiating our youth
And if they do, well, the girls had it coming for being attractive, right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sure, we'll stop the internet from vitiating our youth
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And nothing of value was lost.
I'm still wondering though if some of those idiots will be popping up here in the comments again defending the move like last time.
Of course, whatever is still here, so we have a least one contender.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: techflaws on Jan 28th, 2016 @ 9:49pm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Considering some site counts put the number of pages in the billions and that the internet is for porn what Michael Bay is for fireworks... I'd say they are off by a few billions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Paki government plays whack a mole with boners
This is probably really good for namecoin. Which is a move in the right direction in terms of deprecating DNS.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pakistan Orders ISPs To Block 4,293,430 Proxy Websites
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pakistani and Indian Clothing,Pakistani Salwar Kameez,indian Asian Dresses in Europe, USA and Canada. For Vistit our website: http:discountmeonline.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pakistani and Indian Clothing,Pakistani Salwar Kameez,Indian and Asian Dresses in Europe, USA and Canada
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]